Anzum Posted April 22, 2019 Report Share Posted April 22, 2019 Reading16 N Laurence did not ride Sam Norris 3222 adam Sheppard 22ef1 rhys Laker 1010 IOW 20 Jamie Sealey 0 2f Chris Watts 131 Ben Ilsney 01 Chad Whirtzfeld 3333 Heat 1 Norris Sheppard Watts Sealey 5-1 70.12 heat 2 Whirtzfeld Sheppard Laker Ilsney 3-3 68.21 heat 3 Whirtzfeld Norris Ilsney Laker 2-4 68.30 heat 4 Watts Sealey Laker Sheppard ef 1-5 71.86 heat 5 Whirtzfeld Norris Watts Laker 2-4 68.71 heat 6 Whirtzfeld Norris Sheppard Sealey F 3-3 70.66 sorry if spelt names wrong. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anzum Posted April 22, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2019 Whirtzfeld looked very good as did Norris. Sheppard was clear when ef on lap 3. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teaboy279 Posted April 30, 2019 Report Share Posted April 30, 2019 I see the result has been amended to a 16-17 scoreline. The elligability of Chad's 4th ride being questioned I believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anzum Posted April 30, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 30, 2019 Interesting. I wasn't sure what the rules were/are. Though if he hadn't ridden in the last heat most likely have ended 18-18. Reading were likely to get a 5-1 based on the the original IOW line up for heat 6 and what had happened in the earlier heats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.