mrss Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 2 hours ago, Danny Connor said: I’ll wait a couple more meetings before calling for changes. Was a decent meeting. Shame about the result. Riss Jorgensen and Kerr did their jobs. You could tell we were a little rusty though. The only Stars rider that done his job was Riss. The rest of the team were very ordinary, with Kasper being worse than that. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iris123 Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 Compelling question obviously is, is the track photographer an improvement on last season ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 2 hours ago, Bagpuss said: Two half decent races for £18 on a chilly night didn’t feel like particularly good VFM especially when the team lost. Not an awful lot wrong from numbers 2-6 but the number one and seven aren’t doing the required job at the moment, one of those riders will obviously come good once machinery is sorted but you wonder if the other has it in him to pull his weight. Still early days so the benefit of the doubt must go to him for a few more meetings yet. Poole were decent value for their win although ten points was a bit flattering considering how tight things were for thirteen heats. Lots of rusty men and machines on show for both sides and a fairly flat atmosphere, sometimes it feels like a social occasion where people meet for a chat and a beer / tea / coffee with some incidental speedway going on in the background. Not a lot of rider / crowd interaction but a pretty healthy attendance judging by the car parks. Hoping for better on all fronts next week against those pesky Twitches. Finally something sensible. I don't grasp all those naysayers claiming this meeting proved them right about Kings Lynn. Most of the side scored well. You cannot legislate for your No 1, an out and out No 1 at that, only scoring 4pts. He should be scoring 13-14 at home. Had he done so, Kings Lynn have a fairly comfortable win. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Bloke Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 2 hours ago, Danny Connor said: I’ll wait a couple more meetings before calling for changes. Was a decent meeting. Shame about the result. Riss Jorgensen and Kerr did their jobs. You could tell we were a little rusty though. I wasn't there, but the speedway update site shows that Erik did his job and then some, TJ was solid and did his job, but Lewis score of 4 from 4 rides don't look good on paper..But as I said I wasn't there. It is early days and I think Lewis will need more meetings under his belt after that long lay off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Bloke Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 (edited) 27 minutes ago, BWitcher said: Finally something sensible. I don't grasp all those naysayers claiming this meeting proved them right about Kings Lynn. Most of the side scored well. You cannot legislate for your No 1, an out and out No 1 at that, only scoring 4pts. He should be scoring 13-14 at home. Had he done so, Kings Lynn have a fairly comfortable win. I guess time will tell. It was a good job our 6 point rider Erik Riss scored 11 and won 3 races out of Lynns 4 race wins, otherwise it would be worse. As for most of the riders scored well, we had Lambo 4 from 4 rides Ty 5 from 4 rides, from a 6.67 av rider, and at home. Lewis 4 from 4 rides... has a 5.36 average Kasper 0 on an assessed 4 I know it's early days and it seems harsh at this stage of the season,but just replying to your comment that most of the side scored well. Theres 4 there that you could argue didn't Edited April 9, 2019 by Bald Bloke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 32 minutes ago, BWitcher said: Finally something sensible. I don't grasp all those naysayers claiming this meeting proved them right about Kings Lynn. Most of the side scored well. You cannot legislate for your No 1, an out and out No 1 at that, only scoring 4pts. He should be scoring 13-14 at home. Had he done so, Kings Lynn have a fairly comfortable win. Kings Lynn would not have won easily if Lambert had scored 13 , Poole should have won more easily , if Jack had scored what he should have Poole would have won by a lot more, particularly impressed with NBJ looks a good signing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haza Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 Going by the away meeting at foxhole and last night v Poole- Thursday night away at Poole is going to be very difficult meeting for the Stars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 30 minutes ago, Bald Bloke said: I guess time will tell. It was a good job our 6 point rider Erik Riss scored 11 and won 3 races out of Lynns 4 race wins, otherwise it would be worse. As for most of the riders scored well, we had Lambo 4 from 4 rides Ty 5 from 4 rides, from a 6.67 av rider, and at home. Lewis 4 from 4 rides... has a 5.36 average Kasper 0 on an assessed 4 I know it's early days and it seems harsh at this stage of the season,but just replying to your comment that most of the side scored well. Theres 4 there that you could argue didn't I've already stated Lambert was the problem. The others were close to what you would expect. Some meetings they might get 4, others they'll get 7 or 8. They are middle order, inconsistent by nature. If your big hitting no 1 only scores 4, you are massively up against it from the start. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 21 minutes ago, foreverblue said: Kings Lynn would not have won easily if Lambert had scored 13 , Poole should have won more easily , if Jack had scored what he should have Poole would have won by a lot more, particularly impressed with NBJ looks a good signing. Yes they would. Holder did about as expected score wise.. 7.39 rider, now riding at No 1.. against a Kings Lynn team pretty solid in the middle order. There is none of them you can 100% say he should be beating pretty much every time. Lambert is a different kettle of fish. An out and out No 1 whose job role is to score big. Any time a side built in that fashion has their top dog under perform so much they are in trouble. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagpuss Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 (edited) Kerr was fast and competitive in his first two then having a good scrap while holding third when he went wide and lost ground in his third race before being outgated in heat 14. He was ok but will want to be scoring more than that at home and I’m sure he will. Thought Jorgensen rode pretty well. Proctor and MPT were ok but need to do a bit more and Riss was obviously excellent. As Bwitcher says a normal score from Lambert and we’d have won but in any event Poole will / would win over two legs. Just don’t think it’s all doom and gloom although Kasper is a bit of a concern as he looked no better round Lynn than a year ago. Next week’s result is likely to tell us an awful lot. Edited April 9, 2019 by Bagpuss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagpuss Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 1 hour ago, foreverblue said: Kings Lynn would not have won easily if Lambert had scored 13 , Poole should have won more easily , if Jack had scored what he should have Poole would have won by a lot more, particularly impressed with NBJ looks a good signing. You are one of the better Poole posters fb and have been for some years but occasionally I do wonder which planet you are posting from. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, foreverblue said: Kings Lynn would not have won easily if Lambert had scored 13 , Poole should have won more easily , if Jack had scored what he should have Poole would have won by a lot more, particularly impressed with NBJ looks a good signing. You cant be comparing Jack Holder to Robert Lambert surely? Poole have built a 1-7 that is solid with no number one. Jack Holder scored 6 away from home which is roughly what you would expect maybe 1 or 2 points more Robert Lambert scored 4.......you would expect 13 plus from him at home. Jack Holder scored roughly what was expected and Robert Lambert didnt.......Lamberts poor form cost Lynn a chance of the meeting. We have a number one in Chris Harris who would be expecting 7-9 most away meetings , in a similar bracket to Jack Holder who also isnt an out and out number one. Were you seriously expecting a double figure score from Jack Holder? Edited April 9, 2019 by Gavan 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poolebolton Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Gavan said: You cant be comparing Jack Holder to Robert Lambert surely? Poole have built a 1-7 that is solid with no number one. Jack Holder scored 6 away from home which is roughly what you would expect maybe 1 or 2 points more Robert Lambert scored 4.......you would expect 13 plus from him at home. Jack Holder scored roughly what was expected and Robert Lambert didnt.......Lamberts poor form cost Lynn a chance of the meeting. We have a number one in Chris Harris who would be expecting 7-9 most away meetings , in a similar bracket to Jack Holder who also isnt an out and out number one. Were you seriously expecting a double figure score from Jack Holder? Agree with Gavan. Holder/Kurtz probs expected to get 9/10 at most per meeting and the way our team is set up they just need to get that. Doyle and Batch need to get 10-15 a meeting and well Lambert might need to get 15 a meeting. Once Riss goes to 5 he will not be getting 11 points a meeting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray c Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 16 minutes ago, poolebolton said: Agree with Gavan. Holder/Kurtz probs expected to get 9/10 at most per meeting and the way our team is set up they just need to get that. Doyle and Batch need to get 10-15 a meeting and well Lambert might need to get 15 a meeting. Once Riss goes to 5 he will not be getting 11 points a meeting. agree it will jack one meeting and brady another top scorer. to early yet to judge I hope its jack year to kick on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue witch Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 If Lambert would've got an extra 6 points to get 10 no matter how bad the other riders were you would've won last night. Small margins but thats how it is when you go for a big hitter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Gavan said: You cant be comparing Jack Holder to Robert Lambert surely? Poole have built a 1-7 that is solid with no number one. Jack Holder scored 6 away from home which is roughly what you would expect maybe 1 or 2 points more Robert Lambert scored 4.......you would expect 13 plus from him at home. Jack Holder scored roughly what was expected and Robert Lambert didnt.......Lamberts poor form cost Lynn a chance of the meeting. We have a number one in Chris Harris who would be expecting 7-9 most away meetings , in a similar bracket to Jack Holder who also isnt an out and out number one. Were you seriously expecting a double figure score from Jack Holder? With their respective ability I can see Jack and Brady getting double figures in most meetings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poolebolton Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 7 minutes ago, ray c said: agree it will jack one meeting and brady another top scorer. to early yet to judge I hope its jack year to kick on I think Jack is still feeling that foot injury and took him a few rides to find the set up. I think now him and Brady have done the first year in Poland it should get better. Having Chris in the pits will help. As riders go he certainly knows the quickest way around poole Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 2 hours ago, BWitcher said: Yes they would. Holder did about as expected score wise.. 7.39 rider, now riding at No 1.. against a Kings Lynn team pretty solid in the middle order. There is none of them you can 100% say he should be beating pretty much every time. Lambert is a different kettle of fish. An out and out No 1 whose job role is to score big. Any time a side built in that fashion has their top dog under perform so much they are in trouble. I would expect Lambert to outscore Jack and Brady but if you were there as I was you realise how poor jack was in the early races Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 2 hours ago, BWitcher said: Yes they would. Holder did about as expected score wise.. 7.39 rider, now riding at No 1.. against a Kings Lynn team pretty solid in the middle order. There is none of them you can 100% say he should be beating pretty much every time. Lambert is a different kettle of fish. An out and out No 1 whose job role is to score big. Any time a side built in that fashion has their top dog under perform so much they are in trouble. Holder is a lot better than what he showed last night, in his first 3 races he was very poor. I would expect him to get 10 even if Lambert was on form and the same goes for Brady. The result was not all about Lambert being poor, Andersen got zero, Kerr got 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPEEDY69 Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 4 hours ago, BWitcher said: Finally something sensible. I don't grasp all those naysayers claiming this meeting proved them right about Kings Lynn. Most of the side scored well. You cannot legislate for your No 1, an out and out No 1 at that, only scoring 4pts. He should be scoring 13-14 at home. Had he done so, Kings Lynn have a fairly comfortable win. That was more than he scored at Ipswich I think. His scoring is crucial for them and on the evidence of these two meetings he isn't an out and out No.1, as you assess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.