Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Newcastle Diamonds vs Berwick Bandits CS


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Dandelion said:

What's the point until waiting until the end of June, the season will be well and truly over by then...

Because if you change now you basically change like for like average wise in June youĀ have 2 more points to play with so if everything stayed the same and no averages changed and Danny went you can have a 4 point replacement instead of a 2 point riderĀ or if Simon went a 6 point replacement instead of a 4 point rider

So as Tsunami said you might as well give what you have a chance to pull themselves round before chopping and changing for changing sake...

RegardsĀ 

THJĀ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But John,,, if the riders averages stayed the same, come the end of June, it would mean that they have under-performed. Riders averages are likely to improve as they are racing for more points. The averages work on being based on 42 points, so you average team, will score 42 points on average. So each team, on average, will have 4 points, (like free points), per match to absorb into their collective team average, so really, each riders average will increase by about 0.6. If a riders average does not increase, by say half a point, it would suggest that they are not performing to their previous average. So, come the end of June, if you have a spare 2 points to play with, you will be really struggling as a team. Although, it might be an idea to bring in a rider that has not ridden this season, on their false 'lower average', thats one without the 0.6 free increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ruffdiamond said:

But John,,, if the riders averages stayed the same, come the end of June, it would mean that they have under-performed. Riders averages are likely to improve as they are racing for more points. The averages work on being based on 42 points, so you average team, will score 42 points on average. So each team, on average, will have 4 points, (like free points), per match to absorb into their collective team average, so really, each riders average will increase by about 0.6. If a riders average does not increase, by say half a point, it would suggest that they are not performing to their previous average. So, come the end of June, if you have a spare 2 points to play with, you will be really struggling as a team. Although, it might be an idea to bring in a rider that has not ridden this season, on their false 'lower average', thats one without the 0.6 free increase.

Instead of 40 the real uplift should be to 42.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ruffdiamond said:

But John,,, if the riders averages stayed the same, come the end of June, it would mean that they have under-performed.

Correct:

However: like I said in the original post to the response that we should be changing and swapping riders out now that my post was "all speculation" and "who knows" what the averages will be in June and it was aĀ "make believe scenario" however after two meaningful meetings in the Shield we are averaging 37.5 points per meeting and after four meetings to date we are averaging 39.75 as a teamĀ (if you include the Redcar matches); withĀ the current team rolling averages comingĀ in at 37.95 then take off the 2.5% reduction (for the qualifying riders) this brings the total team average to 37.57; so and this is "pure speculation" it is not impossible for the team average to be at this level come June but as someone stated the team would be in a bit of a predicament (bottom) I would suggest.

Last year Workington third inĀ the league with a combined end of season team average of 42.79 (strange when you need 45 to win a match) without any team changes and Sheffield were bottom with 38.60 then Redcar next with 39.66; Lakeside who were fourthĀ had a team average of 44.23 and also didn't make any team changes all season with Edinburgh top of the end of season team averages with 46.44 and only ended up 6th in the league (with a few changes to personnel).

What I was trying to do in a moment of boredom (and trying to inject some wit and humour) (to which I failed miserably) was to point out that unforced changes this early in the season are a complete waste of time, Tsunami has hit the nail on the head. Your argument is valid; however; exactly as I have done; you are speculating on what might or might not happen with regards to the averages, if you prove to be right and have that much foresight give me the numbers for the lottery this week I would like to retire and sponsor Speedway as a hobby. I also stated above "Like many often state on here nothing in Speedway is straight forward however these type of conundrums are the ones most like to ponder".

If Newcastle continue in the same vein it could be a long hard season and I suggest there would be changes; the only point I was trying to make was "it is folly looking at swapping riders out after the first two matches of the season without there being a very valid reason to do so" Scunny have done it for the right reasons with the young kid they have swapped outĀ so as not to destroy his confidence. Danny Phillips would be the obvious choice however he has been around some time and just come back after a bad injury, he was up over 5.5 points at home in 2017 with a rolling average of 3.5. does he not deserve a bit of time?

So to recap my main point is "there is no value IMHO in swapping out riders this early in the season unlessĀ possibly aĀ bad injury or "Force Majeure" is inflicted on the team" and byĀ "Force Majeure"Ā  I mean something like someone has a total loss of confidence and says they have had enough and they walk or the situation the club found itself in a few year back with the sad demise of Matej Ferjan.

So for me no changes please just yet and the numbers will dictate (as ever) who we can have come in whether it be April May or June even up to the cut off date for signings... A team what sticks together wins together Worky Lakeside nil changesĀ and play off finals but its all just numbers at the end of the day. Pick what ever you want and just make something up?

Regards
THJ

Edited by TotallyHonestJohn
Spelling,
Link to comment
Share on other sites

THJ, the teams average is worked on the scenario of 14 heats (84 points/42 points each team),,, 7 riders x 4 races = 28 races Ć· 1 pair of riders = 14 heats,,, therefore there is no need for the team to average 45/46 to win each match, so Workingtons 42.79 combined average was capable of having won every matchĀ :t:

Edited by ruffdiamond
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what's ya point

It depends on where the points are scored.... forget heat 15... and does it really matter we are talking about fairy land here not the real world, ifs' ands'Ā maybes' and might never happensĀ plus the team build was 38 and goes to 40 in June and the pubs are open and I'm blowing half a shift who gives a rats....

RegardsĀ 

THJĀ 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TotallyHonestJohn said:

So what's ya point

It depends on where the points are scored.... forget heat 15... and does it really matter we are talking about fairy land here not the real world, ifs' ands'Ā maybes' and might never happensĀ plus the team build was 38 and goes to 40 in June and the pubs are open and I'm blowing half a shift who gives a rats....

RegardsĀ 

THJĀ 

EnjoyĀ :t:

The point is that you don't have to have a combined team average much above 42 to win every match, in the land of the fairies ;)

Edited by ruffdiamond
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ruffdiamond said:

EnjoyĀ :t:

The point is that you don't have to have a combined team average much above 42 to win every match, in the land of the fairies ;)

Exactly as inĀ Redcar and Sheffield didn't loose all their matches but look where their team averages ended up...

I rest my case.... I think.....

RegardsĀ 

THJĀ 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't exactly call Jordan Jenkins in for Danny Phillips a like for like tbh...

Plus we need to find riders who can ride our track, if a rider comes in on a similar average to Simon, but can actually ride Brough, then it's an upgrade is it not? It may be like for like on paper, but on shale, maybe not? Isn't that the trick to team building anyway,,, Maybe someone like Mikkel B Andersen might ride Brough better? (I don't remember how he did but just as an example)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Dandelion said:

I wouldn't exactly call Jordan Jenkins in for Danny Phillips a like for like tbh...

Plus we need to find riders who can ride our track, if a rider comes in on a similar average to Simon, but can actually ride Brough, then it's an upgrade is it not? It may be like for like on paper, but on shale, maybe not? Isn't that the trick to team building anyway,,, Maybe someone like Mikkel B Andersen might ride Brough better? (I don't remember how he did but just as an example)

A think it was fairly obvious that Simon would/will struggle at Brough, although some may think that away, on bigger tracks points might come and he might chuck in a few points. He might be able to suss Brough and, should be given time, but he's on his average for a reason.

I hate the editor.

Edited by ruffdiamond
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy