Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Rob Godfrey interview in Speedway Star


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BWitcher said:

Yes you do and it absolutely ridiculous to suggest otherwise. That's how all riders are judged.

When riders win the majority of their races they are considered great riders.

The less they win, the less great they are considered.

I'd love to hear how you and Steve Roberts 'judge' riders if it's not based on how often they win. Strangely you've never listed any riders whom you classed as 'world class' who didn't do the exact thing which you say you don't judge riders on...

 

 

...seeing that you've raised my name (by presumably checking on those who register 'likes') it's been covered many times elsewhere on other threads on how I 'judge' riders great or otherwise depending upon the criteria over the months and years on the BSF. Indeed you only need to consult 'The Greatest/Favourites Lists' threads, for example, to see some of my comments and/or observations regarding riders if you so wish to help clarify any misunderstanding and/or confusion that you may have.

Edited by steve roberts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BWitcher said:

Yes you do and it absolutely ridiculous to suggest otherwise. That's how all riders are judged.

When riders win the majority of their races they are considered great riders.

The less they win, the less great they are considered.

I'd love to hear how you and Steve Roberts 'judge' riders if it's not based on how often they win. Strangely you've never listed any riders whom you classed as 'world class' who didn't do the exact thing which you say you don't judge riders on...

 

 

Looking back over old programmes it is surprising the number of riders that my memory tells me were very good weren’t actually all that consistent, it’s just that I have been judging them on the basis of a few great races I remember and one tends to forget the ones they don’t do so well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BWitcher said:

Yes you do and it absolutely ridiculous to suggest otherwise. That's how all riders are judged.

When riders win the majority of their races they are considered great riders.

The less they win, the less great they are considered.

I'd love to hear how you and Steve Roberts 'judge' riders if it's not based on how often they win. Strangely you've never listed any riders whom you classed as 'world class' who didn't do the exact thing which you say you don't judge riders on...

 

 

My experience Witcher i never really went on averages and reputation more on what i felt individually.Me and you have differed on this subject  endlessly but i know your points are good  and they could well  be right.My take on things was that in yesteryear you really looked forward to a classy no 1 being in opposition often you might only see him once a year and maybe another individual meeting if you are lucky.Steve Roberts see Nielsen in his prime everyweek i did 84/87  so he knows more about Hans than me or anyone at Oxford.I don't  disagree with you Witcher also your input on Ermolenko  ( like Steve you know Sam's career) is interesting you see him for a long period and you are really qualified to comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Sidney the robin said:

My experience Witcher i never really went on averages and reputation more on what i felt individually.Me and you have differed on this subject  endlessly but i know your points are good  and they could well  be right.My take on things was that in yesteryear you really looked forward to a classy no 1 being in opposition often you might only see him once a year and maybe another individual meeting if you are lucky.Steve Roberts see Nielsen in his prime everyweek i did 84/87  so he knows more about Hans than me or anyone at Oxford.I don't  disagree with you Witcher also your input on Ermolenko  ( like Steve you know Sam's career) is interesting you see him for a long period and you are really qualified to comment.

Always irritated me that "Rebel With A Cause' Garry Middleton often had the beating of Briggo but encountered problems when up against Martin Ashby!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, steve roberts said:

Always irritated me that "Rebel With A Cause' Garry Middleton often had the beating of Briggo but encountered problems when up against Martin Ashby!

I remember him losing his rag after being excluded from a race at West Ham, and leaving his bike across the track.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sidney the robin said:

My experience Witcher i never really went on averages and reputation more on what i felt individually.Me and you have differed on this subject  endlessly but i know your points are good  and they could well  be right.My take on things was that in yesteryear you really looked forward to a classy no 1 being in opposition often you might only see him once a year and maybe another individual meeting if you are lucky.Steve Roberts see Nielsen in his prime everyweek i did 84/87  so he knows more about Hans than me or anyone at Oxford.I don't  disagree with you Witcher also your input on Ermolenko  ( like Steve you know Sam's career) is interesting you see him for a long period and you are really qualified to comment.

Averages is irrelevant. 

The rest of your post is my entire point! That's entirely due to a large league. A smaller league you're seeing the riders much more often, and they are beating each other more often.. it's simply natural they don't have that mystique about them as you're seeing them lose a lot more regularly.

Remember, the real 'top' boys will still be the top boys.. but the second and third heat leaders won't appear as good.

Another way of putting it.. a fan just watching GP racing would think Craig Cook and Chris Harris are garbage.. a fan watching Craig Cook for Edinburgh over the years thinks he's brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steve roberts said:

...seeing that you've raised my name (by presumably checking on those who register 'likes') it's been covered many times elsewhere on other threads on how I 'judge' riders great or otherwise depending upon the criteria over the months and years on the BSF. Indeed you only need to consult 'The Greatest/Favourites Lists' threads, for example, to see some of my comments and/or observations regarding riders if you so wish to help clarify any misunderstanding and/or confusion that you may have.

You judge riders by how many races they win. End of story.

Anyone who tries to claim differently is talking absolute nonsense. 

Now you can apply different criteria and importance to particular races or events but the simple reality is, the more you see a rider win, the better you will naturally think they are. 

Nowhere is there someone claiming a rider was brilliant who comes last every race. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BWitcher said:

You judge riders by how many races they win. End of story.

Anyone who tries to claim differently is talking absolute nonsense. 

Now you can apply different criteria and importance to particular races or events but the simple reality is, the more you see a rider win, the better you will naturally think they are. 

Nowhere is there someone claiming a rider was brilliant who comes last every race. 

I can honestly say that I haven't a clue what you are going on about and why you think I've made such judgements and/or quotes on other threads regarding same. End of.

 

 

 

judge' riders if it's not ba.textClipping

Edited by steve roberts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steve roberts said:

I can honestly say that I haven't a clue what you are going on about and why you think I've made such judgements and/or quotes on other threads regarding same. End of.

 

 

 

judge' riders if it's not ba.textClipping

Every time Sidney claims he doesn't judge riders by how many races they win you 'like' his posts.

Every time Sidney refuses to accept that the size of the league dictates how many heat leaders there are you 'like' his post.

It's not a difficult concept. I've for some time been against the merging of leagues but we are past the point of salvation now for a top flight, or indeed any level of league it seems. Perhaps the only way out of this is to go with a big league, create more heat leaders, create more 'top guys' who don't lose very often and generate excitement when teams visit with a No 1 who doesn't get beat often and you will only get to see at your track once that season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BWitcher said:

Every time Sidney claims he doesn't judge riders by how many races they win you 'like' his posts.

Every time Sidney refuses to accept that the size of the league dictates how many heat leaders there are you 'like' his post.

It's not a difficult concept. I've for some time been against the merging of leagues but we are past the point of salvation now for a top flight, or indeed any level of league it seems. Perhaps the only way out of this is to go with a big league, create more heat leaders, create more 'top guys' who don't lose very often and generate excitement when teams visit with a No 1 who doesn't get beat often and you will only get to see at your track once that season.

Oh dear...you do have a fixation with people registering 'likes'. Because one may register a 'like' it doesn't necessarily mean one agrees with all of the statement made...perhaps just one part of same and it doesn't always require or justify a counter statement to clarify same. Many on here apparently do the same when registering a 'like' on some subject or other and if one reads any given response, if indeed forthcoming, often offers clarification. Infact some register a 'like' and then proceed to completely disagree with the post! In a nutshell one shouldn't read too much into a registered 'like'...it can mean one of many things.

As regards the forming of one league I can see the advantages to this but as I've stated elsewhere it would require the full co-operation of all participating promoters and as history has proven many times in the past this has sometimes proved difficult although 1965 did prove to be a turning point and saviour of the sport when the National and Provincial Leagues were merged.

 

Edited by steve roberts
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, steve roberts said:

 

As regards the forming of one league I can see the advantages to this but as I've stated elsewhere it would require the full co-operation of all participating promoters and as history has proven many times in the past this has sometimes proved difficult although 1965 did prove to be a turning point and saviour of the sport when the National and Provincial Leagues were merged.

 

Agreed.. and that's why it's never going to happen or work.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BWitcher said:

Agreed.. and that's why it's never going to happen or work.

Unless .... in 2020 Buster owns 4 or 5 "top" clubs and in 2021 owns the 6, 7 or 8 of them that make up the then creme de la creme ( enough to satisfy BT which seems to be his Holy Grail ). How does he find backers for his acquisitions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waytogo28 said:

Unless .... in 2020 Buster owns 4 or 5 "top" clubs and in 2021 owns the 6, 7 or 8 of them that make up the then creme de la creme ( enough to satisfy BT which seems to be his Holy Grail ). How does he find backers for his acquisitions?

He may well only own 2 through 2019 and be back to only 1 for 2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, steve roberts said:

I can honestly say that I haven't a clue what you are going on about and why you think I've made such judgements and/or quotes on other threads regarding same. End of.

 

 

 

judge' riders if it's not ba.textClipping

Did averages ever come into your way of thinking Steve? i can't quite get my head around that part of the discussion.Hans for example from 1977 he was a good rider until he broke his hoodoo to win his first title then he was a outstanding rider did averages influence that decision i think not He was .the best of his generation mainly because of his longevity, also  i felt in yesteryear a lot of the teams had three heat leaders Ex)( Belle Vue Collins,SjostenPusey.   Ipswich Louis, Sanders,Davey  Kings Lynn Betts, Lee, Turner,  so that high standard of rider showed just how good some of the number one's were.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sidney the robin said:

Did averages ever come into your way of thinking Steve? i can't quite get my head around that part of the discussion.Hans for example from 1977 he was a good rider until he broke his hoodoo to win his first title then he was a outstanding rider did averages influence that decision i think not He was .the best of his generation mainly because of his longevity, also  i felt in yesteryear a lot of the teams had three heat leaders Ex)( Belle Vue Collins,SjostenPusey.   Ipswich Louis, Sanders,Davey  Kings Lynn Betts, Lee, Turner,  so that high standard of rider showed just how good some of the number one's were.

Averages are one factor Sid. If I can back pedal...we were fortunate at Oxford during the seventies with our promotional tie-ups with Eastbourne and Peterborough and we got to see both John Davis and Gordon Kennett start their senior league duties at Cowley. They were very different riders and it was obvious even at that early stage of their careers altough both eventually became genuine number ones (although John had to beat off some serious competion at Reading). John was more of a gater whereas Gordon often had to battle thru' from the back to register a win therefore I put him higher than John as regards the complete rider although their averages followed similar paths. I personally judge riders on all round ability and that's a very subjective and individual view and/or opinion.

Edited by steve roberts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to correct.Gordon Kennett started out at Eastbourne and Wimbledon in 1970.He made second half appearances and also 5 league appearances for the Dons that year.Sadly he we let him get away until his return in the 80s

It was great to see him in the last appearance of speedway bikes before the track closed for good

Edited by iris123
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, iris123 said:

Just to correct.Gordon Kennett started out at Eastbourne and Wimbledon in 1970.He made second half appearances and also 5 league appearances for the Dons that year.Sadly he we let him get away until his return in the 80s

That's indeed true but Gordon moved up full-time with Oxford in 1973 having ridden in some matches towards the back of 1972 as did aforementioned John Davis (however I believe that he was initially on Poole's books?) so it was relelatively easy to compare their progress and differing abilities and/or styles whilst at Cowley.

Edited by steve roberts
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to agree, both great riders, Mavis was flash, brash, great gater ; Gordon was Mr Consistent, best white line passer I think of that era, so close to winning WC in 1978 and like Peter Collins couldn't gate, PC went round the boards and GK round the line. 

Hard to split them but would agree Steve GK was more complete rider for me. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok,I just misunderstood ‘start their senior league duties’.One of those that slipped through our fingers,but for me a big surprise to see him out there at the last speedway ‘night’ and the one rider who really rode the track.Went up in my estimation

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iris123 said:

Ok,I just misunderstood ‘start their senior league duties’.One of those that slipped through our fingers,but for me a big surprise to see him out there at the last speedway ‘night’ and the one rider who really rode the track.Went up in my estimation

Gordon was/is one of my 'all-time' favourites...saw him race many times at Arlington also.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy