Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Glasgow 2019 Onwards


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Mr Blobby said:

More chance of the second one, I’m going to go out on a limb and say he’ll serve no ban at all and if he does it’ll be a shorter length during a period he misses no meetings.

You seem to know a lot about mirky goings on Blobby and dodgy practices.  B) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Fromafar said:

Cook is taking a chance with appeal ,might miss the important stuff at end of season.Unless they know more than they are telling.

What about simply the sole reason why most people want a full hearing....  if he considers he is innocent of the charge, he has evidence to back it up, and for those reasons confident that he will be cleared.

If I was innocent and had the evidence to back it up I sure would appeal it and for those speculating anything except the obvious reason then let them go figure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, BigBoaby said:

What about simply the sole reason why most people want a full hearing....  if he considers he is innocent of the charge, he has evidence to back it up, and for those reasons confident that he will be cleared.

If I was innocent and had the evidence to back it up I sure would appeal it and for those speculating anything except the obvious reason then let them go figure.

I think he could perhaps be trying to get out on a technicality along the lines of if it was noted by the ref on the night that punches were thrown, then why was free to carry on racing?

He obviously isn't innocent of violent conduct or whatever the rule stated as he plainly did what the rule mentioned so it can only be a challenge on procedures not being followed correctly or something like that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, The Doctor... said:

I think he could perhaps be trying to get out on a technicality along the lines of if it was noted by the ref on the night that punches were thrown, then why was free to carry on racing?

He obviously isn't innocent of violent conduct or whatever the rule stated as he plainly did what the rule mentioned so it can only be a challenge on procedures not being followed correctly or something like that.

 

You're talking bollox!!!  Who the hell do you think you are to dictate what the bleedin law is and/or the facts - that's the job of the authorities and for the hearing itself - let them do your job.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BigBoaby said:

You're talking bollox!!!  Who the hell do you think you are to dictate what the bleedin law is and/or the facts - that's the job of the authorities and for the hearing itself - let them do your job.

Scuse me ?  Dictating ?  Get a grip.

The facts are that punches were thrown.  Did you read the original press release where it said what rule was breached.

Other than a technicality how on earth is he getting away with punches thrown ?  Enlighten me 

Edited by The Doctor...
.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, BigBoaby said:

What about simply the sole reason why most people want a full hearing....  if he considers he is innocent of the charge, he has evidence to back it up, and for those reasons confident that he will be cleared.

If I was innocent and had the evidence to back it up I sure would appeal it and for those speculating anything except the obvious reason then let them go figure.

There has to be a Technicality .:rolleyes:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Doctor... said:

Scuse me ?  The facts are that punches were thrown.  Did you read the original press release where it said what rule was breached.

Other than a technicality how on earth is he getting away with punches thrown ?  Enlighten me 

Let the authorities deal with it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BigBoaby said:

You're talking bollox!!!  Who the hell do you think you are to dictate what the bleedin law is and/or the facts - that's the job of the authorities and for the hearing itself - let them do your job.

Calm doon maan !,,, am sure there is a reason for an appeal ;)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Doctor... said:

So your rant was just a rant then.  He threw punches, therefore that rule from the original statement was breached. 

It can only be a procedural technicality he is appealing on. 

No idea what you're talking about mate.  I only said let the authorities deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BigBoaby said:

No idea what you're talking about mate.  I only said let the authorities deal with it.

You said "You're talking bollox!!!  Who the hell do you think you are to dictate what the bleedin law is and/or the facts "

I was there, i know the facts.  The authorities have already dealt with it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Doctor... said:

You said "You're talking bollox!!!  Who the hell do you think you are to dictate what the bleedin law is and/or the facts "

I was there, i know the facts.  The authorities have already dealt with it.  

Well you were taking bollox so fair enough.  They have not finished dealing with it - there is an appeal and a full hearing - so let the authorities deal with it.

You mention punches being thrown, however nothing reported regarding Cook on that particular line.  Above all else though - let the authorities deal with it.

Or are you above the authorities.  Appears you think you are.

 

Edited by BigBoaby
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BigBoaby said:

Well you were taking bollox so fair enough.  The have not finished dealing with it - there is an appeal and a full hearing - so let the authorities deal with it.

You mention punches being thrown, however nothing reported regarding Cook on that particular line.  Above all else though - let the authorities deal with it.

Or are you above the authorities.  Appears you think you are.

Anyone can pass comment ?  Since when do we have to keep silent because something is ongoing ?  

Punches were thrown, so don't try to be clever - the rule is there saying about any act that is violent, etc - i think the punches fit that criteria.

I love how you're all protective of him and that - i'd be the same if it was one of my teams riders - however you need to get your head round the fact there is gonna be discussion.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Doctor... said:

Anyone can pass comment ?  Since when do we have to keep silent because something is ongoing ?  

Punches were thrown, so don't try to be clever - the rule is there saying about any act that is violent, etc - i think the punches fit that criteria.

I love how you're all protective of him and that - i'd be the same if it was one of my teams riders - however you need to get your head round the fact there is gonna be discussion.

 

There has been discussion , must have missed this were.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy