Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peterborough v Lakeside KOC, CS SF & Play Off SF 6th/7th Oct


Recommended Posts

Morley and Bowtell about to contest a run off for the title

Just as well they werent expected at Boro......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Speedway28 said:

I understand that but chances are the NLRC won't be finished till 3.30 at the earliest, then there's the presentation should either get in the top 3. A 5 start at Peterborough is just not enough time. A 7 start would've been attainable for both.

Agreed , it would have solved the problem but the last meeting against Lakeside was put back to 7pm and it was the lowest attendance of the season , so you can understand why they didn't want to put it back to 7pm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Panthers89 said:

Lakeside refusing to ride sounds like a forfeit to me

Down to the ref to be strong and make the correct call - whichever way that is

If he says carry on Lakeside must or as you say forfeit

Equally if he agrees and calls it off you cant complain - his decision must be final

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, scoobydoo said:

Surprised that Peterborough didnt just try to put the 5pm start time back to 7pm if the Showground gods had allowed that is

Then again all this is for the chance to go to Workington and get thumped like Edinburgh last night!!!! 

Rathbone was asked in the pits at Rye last night why he hadn't moved the start time back to 7pm.  He said he didn't want to as it would lose him money on the attendance.

Also, had Rathbone accepted several dates at Arena, the tie would have been completed earlier.  But he was too scared to face the Hammers on their home track, as he knew the Hammers would wallop his team in Essex.  The BSPA wouldn't allow the Hammers to race some meetings at Arena and some at Rye, so he knew they would have to hold all meetings at Rye.  So, it's entirely Rathbone's choice to race on this day and at this time.

Considering Peterborough signed a rider the Hammers were told was illegal when they were going to sign him, in Nicholls (and another in Kennett!); they get to face the same team 4 times without a home track; and the opposition had to use a 16 year old National Leaguer today at 7..... I find it hard to see why Rathbone could feel hard done by at all this season!

Dark pits at Peterborough, I hope everyone can see what they are doing with their bikes!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Panthers89 said:

Lakeside refusing to ride sounds like a forfeit to me

How do you know Lakeside are refusing to ride? Are you there? Why would Lakeside refuse to ride as they are 12 points ahead on agg and unlikely to concede 4 5-1 in the last 4 heats. If meeting is abandoned, result would stand and Lakeside go through without refusing to do anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely love this sport but I, like many others, are finding this year just too much. One of my biggest bugbears at the moment is the constant whining and petty arguments from promotions off the track! In a struggling sport, there are too many simply in it for themselves and unable to get along and help each other out. Peterborough a clear example here. There are many others guilty, Mildenhall and Eastbourne in the National League also clear examples. All I've read and heard in the last three months is the likes of Rob Godfrey and Ged Rathbone moan on and on about why they're being hard done by in various scenarios. I haven't attended Peterborough once this year and that is purely based on this man and how he carries out his business. I fail to see how the sport will ever become improved when we have this constant bickering and whining. Until promotors are willing to help each other, surely they realise their own situations are not going to improve! Let the riders do the talking on the track, that is where the fans want the drama!

Anyway, congratulations to Lakeside on the win. Glad they've managed to get to a final after losing their track.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

A great deal of uninformed nonsense posted here tonight. I challenge any other Club faced with a major floodlight failure to be able to install temporary lights (albeit with a delay) and then complete the meeting.

Respect due. It would have been very easy to call it off and accept defeat, but to battle on against the adversity shows what can be achieved with some effort.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the time of the floodlight failure, the meeting had reached a stage where the result could have been declared. Peterborough, having temporary lights to hand, decided to utilise them in the likely knowledge that this would take some time to put into effect. In the meantime, those who had paid to witness tonight's proceedings were left to shiver in the cold (or go home) not knowing how much longer things would take. The Panthers' promotion made the call and it is for the fans to decide if it was the right one.

As stated above, the opportunity to get this semi-final out of the way much earlier was there if both parties wanted it to happen. Oh, and the Lakeside reserves scored just two points between them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy