Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peterborough v Lakeside KOC, CS SF & Play Off SF 6th/7th Oct


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, BluPanther said:

Should be in the agreement or contract, one must presume Lakeside would have one or the other ....

Start earlier if you can't guarantee to run the meeting, or don't run double headers. I think that only a couple were ever staged at Arena Essex on an evening. From memory the last one ended close to midnight!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, cityrebel said:

Start earlier if you can't guarantee to run the meeting, or don't run double headers. I think that only a couple were ever staged at Arena Essex on an evening. From memory the last one ended close to midnight!

That's far too sensible  :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, New era Panthers said:

Well if it bothers you so much how Panthers run there business stay away as we will hardly miss someone who only turns up once a season will we.

That's an intellectual response. If you re-read my post you'll see I'm discussing a number of promotors, not simply Ged Rathbone. It's a forum, you're allowed an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick question for Neil Watson. 

Can we not book Brady Kurtz as a guest for next Sunday? Leszno are finished in Poland. 

Nicholls average plus 5% percentage is 8.77. Divided by 1.3 equals 6.75.

Kurtz is 6.75.

Can you please do this? 

Brady is brilliant around the Showground. 

Edited by JeremyCorbynFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cityrebel said:

Well there wasn't one two weeks earlier, that is the issue.

Well, mor precisely it wasn’t applied two weeks earlier but whether it was there or not,we don’t seem to know.

There are two separate things here. The first is whether the paying public were cheated. That we don’t know as far as the curfew was concerned. Answer possibly yes.

Second question : did Lakeside cheat by applying a phoney curfew to gain an advantage ? I can’t see that they did. 10 points is not a massive advantage to take to an away track.Bearing in mind Lawson and Morris could go out in heat 15 and Newman more often than not makes heat 14 his own,if I were TM I would go for it and try to build a bigger advantage. 

Also Mick Bates is no fool. If he was told falsely that there was a curfew when there wasn’t there would be repercussions. I am pretty sure  Mick would have checked that out anyway. 

Alls well that ends well. To decent teams deservedly get one cup final each , despite Godfreys attempts to wreck the season for both of them. Leave it at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

re the Saturday not sure if there is a curfew but it was pulled as the meeting before which

went on well past 11pm rye got a ton of complaints so as Peterborough had won the tie anyway

rye decided to call it save anymore grief no cheating or underhand tactics involved

and if most of you on here were there of which it looks like you were not you would know

the first match was the 10 point advantage 1st leg.

as for Peterborough I really hope we stuff them this weekend (weather permitting)

as they are the ones who have over the season have played a game re fixtures etc

also it will be a bit feisty on Saturday as andy was attacked by Peterborough staff

and management for trying to break up a row between the little big man toft and richard

all in front of andys kids they were all very upset and andy didn't carry on understandbly

to be with his kids.

let them try it again the well hards

COYH.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I was there on saturday, and I don't like being short changed for something I have paid for. Speedway fans are taken for mugs on a regular basis by the promoters. If Rye House had received complaints from the neighbours, then a simple statement on their website would have helped explain the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there were complaints previously then this double header should have started earlier, or at the very least it should ave been communicated to the fans that there was a curfew in place prior to the meeting.

Unfortunately comms have never been Lakesides strong point, in fact it’s more of an after thought in many cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, in one way, fans were short-changed - two less heats than expected. On the other hand, a reasonably generous discount for the double header had been applied - entry was £25 against 2 x £17.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

re sundays meeting to put to rest those who think we were cheating re ben and alfie

the NL RIDERS is the only meeting NL teams get First pickings so IOW  of course picked their

best to riders. and to think that ben and alfie could do that meeting then shoot over for sundays meeting

is silly so the club got guests in to make sure we had a full team and to those moaning about this then

look at the stats peterboroughs guests out scored ours say no more/ COYH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, E I Addio said:

Well, mor precisely it wasn’t applied two weeks earlier but whether it was there or not,we don’t seem to know.

There are two separate things here. The first is whether the paying public were cheated. That we don’t know as far as the curfew was concerned. Answer possibly yes.

Second question : did Lakeside cheat by applying a phoney curfew to gain an advantage ? I can’t see that they did. 10 points is not a massive advantage to take to an away track.Bearing in mind Lawson and Morris could go out in heat 15 and Newman more often than not makes heat 14 his own,if I were TM I would go for it and try to build a bigger advantage. 

Also Mick Bates is no fool. If he was told falsely that there was a curfew when there wasn’t there would be repercussions. I am pretty sure  Mick would have checked that out anyway. 

Alls well that ends well. To decent teams deservedly get one cup final each , despite Godfreys attempts to wreck the season for both of them. Leave it at that.

It wasn’t cheating it was deceiving the paying supporters who had paid to see two double headers, then to blame it on a non existent curfew when in reality it was down to recent complaints over the last double header and the fact that Lakeside couldn’t qualify even if the last two heats were run.

Why not tell the truth for once.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy