Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Poole 2019


Aviator

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bald Bloke said:

Nothing wrong.. Thanks.. :t: Stupid... it was a final, Lynn's first chance to the title, NKI got injured, I think it was the night before and it was within the rules. Poole would of done the same !!

You will never convince me that Ford would do anything in a final to benefit the other team.

Poole where 1 rider down. About a week later, in the cup Somerset where 4 riders down and used Wright at home in leg one, but couldn't use him in leg 2 at the AFA because he was just over, and it was just. Do you think it was fair to allow Poole to do it with 1 rider out and not Somerset with 4 ?

How is that fair? I don't think I read one person moaning about the way Somerset beat Lynn over 2 legs in the cup either. I wonder why.

I'm not saying it was anyone's fault other that the powers that be. A rule is should be  the same for all.

If you going play ground stuff, Poole pulled the 1st hissy fit  after Lynn booked Ellis, which was legal .  Anything after that was avoidable if that was allowed, as stated in the rulebook.

And before you say that Morris average fitted at the time, and they hadn't amended the averages, that's not the case at all. They fit now, but not at the time.

And i'm not bringing it all up again. I was just replying to Lynn supporter Daniel Smith's post ;)

That's about it. On to 2019. And Buster is coming for you :P

 

Well he's got 3 chances, but none of them will finish above Poole 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bald Bloke said:

Nothing wrong.. Thanks.. :t: Stupid... it was a final, Lynn's first chance to the title, NKI got injured, I think it was the night before and it was within the rules. Poole would of done the same !!

You will never convince me that Ford would do anything in a final to benefit the other team.

Poole where 1 rider down. About a week later, in the cup Somerset where 4 riders down and used Wright at home in leg one, but couldn't use him in leg 2 at the AFA because he was just over, and it was just. Do you think it was fair to allow Poole to do it with 1 rider out and not Somerset with 4 ?

How is that fair? I don't think I read one person moaning about the way Somerset beat Lynn over 2 legs in the cup either. I wonder why.

I'm not saying it was anyone's fault other that the powers that be. A rule is should be  the same for all.

If you going play ground stuff, Poole pulled the 1st hissy fit  after Lynn booked Ellis, which was legal .  Anything after that was avoidable if that was allowed, as stated in the rulebook.

And before you say that Morris average fitted at the time, and they hadn't amended the averages, that's not the case at all. They fit now, but not at the time.

And i'm not bringing it all up again. I was just replying to Lynn supporter Daniel Smith's post ;)

That's about it. On to 2019. And Buster is coming for you :P

 

Poole did not have a hissy fit. Where do you get all this crap from, storyland of make believe!! Poole said they couldn't do anything about KL using Ellis. KL realising what a laughing stock they were going to make the final, thought you know what how about we both keep the same guest for both legs. Pity they chose the wrong guest. 

Edited by lisa-colette
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, lisa-colette said:

Poole did not have a hissy fit. Where do you get all this crap from, storyland of make believe!! Poole said they couldn't do anything about KL using Ellis. KL realising what a laughing stock they were going to make the final, thought you know what how about we both keep the same guest for both legs. Pity they chose the wrong guest. 

But they created a big fuss about it. Remember  :approve:

Edited by Bald Bloke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lisa-colette said:

Poole did not have a hissy fit. Where do you get all this crap from, storyland of make believe!! Poole said they couldn't do anything about KL using Ellis. KL realising what a laughing stock they were going to make the final, thought you know what how about we both keep the same guest for both legs. Pity they chose the wrong guest. 

I agree that the final would have been a laughing stock to have a rider riding in both legs for different teams......

Much better to have an illegal rider instead and change the rule just for one match!!!

Ive never said it’s Pooles fault at all

But the final was a farce because of this allowance to let Morris ride

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ray c said:

r/r so easy but who cares I  certainly don't 

With respect. If your team had never won it in 50 odd years and you finished top, and had NKI injured 24 hours before, I think you might see it the same. 

Edited by Bald Bloke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bald Bloke said:

With respect. If your team had never won it in 50 odd years and you finished top, and had NKI injured 24 hours before, I think you might see it the same. 

not at all niels was not your no1 and brady was ours so in theory you had the advantage . anyway we start again next march 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, lisa-colette said:

Nope they didn't. You can blame Poole all you like with your little lies, but KL messed it up themselves. 

Nobody is disagreeing with you thats whats laughable. So paranoid that everyone is having a dig at Poole.

Nick Morris should never have been allowed to ride in the second leg.............its irrelevant who agreed what or who made the choice.............the moment the powers that be allowed Morris to ride it made the whole thing a farce.

The fact is there was never a rule that stopped Adam Ellis riding for both clubs in the final....................all it meant was it just made the sport look daft.

But by Kings Lynn agreeing it was ok for Morris to ride........and then the joke of a governing body allowing it.............also made the sport look daft as well

So bless your heart you can calm down about everyone having a go at Poole because they arent.............the sport was made to look daft yet again.

Injuries are part and parcel of the sport and Poole had to beat very weakened teams in the semi final and final....thats not Pooles fault they just got very lucky

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gavan said:

Nobody is disagreeing with you thats whats laughable. So paranoid that everyone is having a dig at Poole.

Nick Morris should never have been allowed to ride in the second leg.............its irrelevant who agreed what or who made the choice.............the moment the powers that be allowed Morris to ride it made the whole thing a farce.

The fact is there was never a rule that stopped Adam Ellis riding for both clubs in the final....................all it meant was it just made the sport look daft.

But by Kings Lynn agreeing it was ok for Morris to ride........and then the joke of a governing body allowing it.............also made the sport look daft as well

So bless your heart you can calm down about everyone having a go at Poole because they arent.............the sport was made to look daft yet again.

Injuries are part and parcel of the sport and Poole had to beat very weakened teams in the semi final and final....thats not Pooles fault they just got very lucky

Oooh more lies!! Where have I said anyone is having a dig at Poole? Oh yeah I haven't! But if people are going to blatantly lie because they are still so bitter about something, then I will call them out on it!

As for your second lie, KL did not agree to anything they SUGGESTED it, once you get that through your head, maybe people will move on. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, lisa-colette said:

Oooh more lies!! Where have I said anyone is having a dig at Poole? Oh yeah I haven't! But if people are going to blatantly lie because they are still so bitter about something, then I will call them out on it!

As for your second lie, KL did not agree to anything they SUGGESTED it, once you get that through your head, maybe people will move on. 

My second lie? Seriously have a read at what I have wrote because clearly you have an issue

I BLAMED Kings Lynn for suggesting it not Poole

However the powers that be should have told Kings Lynn no..... is that hard for you to understand!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Gavan said:

My second lie? Seriously have a read at what I have wrote because clearly you have an issue

I BLAMED Kings Lynn for suggesting it not Poole

However the powers that be should have told Kings Lynn no..... is that hard for you to understand!

 

No, you blamed KL for 'agreeing' to it. You have said nothing about them suggesting it. You put... ' by KL agreeing it was ok for Morris to ride..' 

Okay you didn't say Poole suggested it, but someone must have unless KL suggested and agreed to it by themselves! Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy