Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Poole 2019


Aviator

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Alan_Jones said:

Any proof that KL drove the decision or just the usual Poole spin? I've pointed out that it was the SCB & BSPA that covered for their original incompetence in failing to frame the rules correctly by breaking them and encouraging both teams and the referee to do so.

Dale Allitt has stated publicly that it was KL's proposal to Poole which was then ratified by the SCB and BSPA MC to avoid the sport being further vilified by allowing Ellis to guest for both clubs in the final.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Skidder1 said:

Dale Allitt has stated publicly that it was KL's proposal to Poole which was then ratified by the SCB and BSPA MC to avoid the sport being further vilified by allowing Ellis to guest for both clubs in the final.

I've said many times that it should not of been allowed. Morris did not fit, i don't blame Poole or Lynn.. It don't matter who pushed what, The fault lies higher up the ladder.

Somerset were 4 riders down in the cup leg 2 and the couldn't use Wright at Lynn because he was 0.05 over.. Either everyone gets the +5% away or no one does.It's not hard to understand.;)How many fans have moaned about Somerset winning the cup, I doubt if any have. Why....No special treatment was allowed !:blink:

Edited by Bald Bloke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Steve0 said:

You are wrong!  I have said several times that if Poole had used RR or an eligible guest then they would have deserved their win.  Instead, they chose to cheat and use an ineligible guest.  You don’t see me calling you names either or being personal!  What I can’t stand is cheating - and it would be same if Swindon had cheated too!

Rubbish, had we not used an elilgble guest it would have not been sanctioned, so get off your high horse and just accept it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Starman2006 said:

Rubbish, had we not used an elilgble guest it would have not been sanctioned,

 

That makes zero sense!

Had Poole used an eligible guest it wouldn't need to be sanctioned.... because....well... it would have been eligible anyway.

They had to get permission to use an otherwise ineligible guest.    And god knows why that permission was granted.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Starman2006 said:

Rubbish, had we not used an elilgble guest it would have not been sanctioned, so get off your high horse and just accept it.

 

Let us be clear. There is and never has been any rule anywhere in the rulebook that makes Nick Morris an eligible guest in the second leg.

We can debate whether or not it was appropriate for the SCB to sanction his use but it certainly wasn't within the rules as laid down in the rulebook.

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poole fans missing the point but nothing new there.

Because Kings Lynn agreed to it (more fool them) doesnt make it right that the powers that be approved it.

Whats more farcical...................having a rider ride for both teams or to have an illegal rider? Both make a mockery of our once great sport.

And the three teams that top the table......Kings Lynn, Peterborough and Mildenhall .....all fail to win their leagues.

Poole won the league because they fielded the worst 1-7 for the first few months..............nice to be rewarded for failure.

Peterborough and Mildenhall were decimated by injuries, similar to Kings Lynn, Somerset and Belle Vue............Poole would have easily lost the semis to a full strength Somerset but you can only beat whats in front of you so Poole were lucky to face a 5 man team

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Skidder1 said:

Dale Allitt has stated publicly that it was KL's proposal to Poole which was then ratified by the SCB and BSPA MC to avoid the sport being further vilified by allowing Ellis to guest for both clubs in the final.

Come on dont let the facts ruin a good old Poole Bashing !!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gavan said:

Poole fans missing the point but nothing new there.

Because Kings Lynn agreed to it (more fool them) doesnt make it right that the powers that be approved it.

Whats more farcical...................having a rider ride for both teams or to have an illegal rider? Both make a mockery of our once great sport.

And the three teams that top the table......Kings Lynn, Peterborough and Mildenhall .....all fail to win their leagues.

Poole won the league because they fielded the worst 1-7 for the first few months..............nice to be rewarded for failure.

Peterborough and Mildenhall were decimated by injuries, similar to Kings Lynn, Somerset and Belle Vue............Poole would have easily lost the semis to a full strength Somerset but you can only beat whats in front of you so Poole were lucky to face a 5 man team

 

Just cant help yourself can you. We won the league you should all get over it otherwise you will ruin your Christmas How many bags of Sour grapes do you have left... ? Chomp chomp chomp

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, arnieg said:

Let us be clear. There is and never has been any rule anywhere in the rulebook that makes Nick Morris an eligible guest in the second leg.

We can debate whether or not it was appropriate for the SCB to sanction his use but it certainly wasn't within the rules as laid down in the rulebook.

 

Lets be clear, if he was not eligble then the booking would not have been sanctioned. So please, get over it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, WalterPlinge said:

That makes zero sense!

Had Poole used an eligible guest it wouldn't need to be sanctioned.... because....well... it would have been eligible anyway.

They had to get permission to use an otherwise ineligible guest.    And god knows why that permission was granted.

He was eligble so please get over it. Jeez ive never known so many moaners on one site.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ouch said:

Why did you mug that old

lady. 

Him over there said it was alright. 

Think your on the wrong site mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Gavan said:

Poole fans missing the point but nothing new there.

Because Kings Lynn agreed to it (more fool them) doesnt make it right that the powers that be approved it.

Whats more farcical...................having a rider ride for both teams or to have an illegal rider? Both make a mockery of our once great sport.

And the three teams that top the table......Kings Lynn, Peterborough and Mildenhall .....all fail to win their leagues.

Poole won the league because they fielded the worst 1-7 for the first few months..............nice to be rewarded for failure.

Peterborough and Mildenhall were decimated by injuries, similar to Kings Lynn, Somerset and Belle Vue............Poole would have easily lost the semis to a full strength Somerset but you can only beat whats in front of you so Poole were lucky to face a 5 man team

 

So are you going to congratulate Poole Pirates, Matt and Middlo, riders and the fans of the club on a fabulous backs to the wall against all the odds victory?

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why doesn't everyone leave the Poole fans to wallow in their own glory, they will always think it is all fair and above board whatever they do.

 Why don't other posters stop biting at their comments and ignore them and just leave them to talk among themselves, they only do it to get a reaction on all sites not just their own

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy