Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Poole 2019


Aviator

Recommended Posts

Just now, waytogo28 said:

It is almost a fossil now in so many places. This may do less harm than carrying on, carrying on as they have for 20 years.

Maybe, but i certainly cannot see 6 man teams increasing attendances anywhere, imo it will do the exact opposite. imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Starman2006 said:

Maybe, but i certainly cannot see 6 man teams increasing attendances anywhere, imo it will do the exact opposite. imo.

As I see it, there is no hope of a significant revival regardless of whatever plan the BSPA come up with. Managed decline is all that it is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, waytogo28 said:

As I see it, there is no hope of a significant revival regardless of whatever plan the BSPA come up with. Managed decline is all that it is now.

Which confirms that SS method of valuation of Poole was complete pie in the sky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are many changes that need to be made but as I have said previously it would be a significant step forward and cost nothing for them to devise a sensible rule book that is applied impartially and without exception. That would at least ensure that the various competitions, league, KO Cup etc., have a greater degree of credibility.

Unfortunately, I have little confidence that we shall ever see it considering that the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the BSPA and the SCB were involved in the farce we witnessed involving the guests for the play off final.  They obviously thought that the best solution to the problem was to ignore the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aces51 said:

There are many changes that need to be made but as I have said previously it would be a significant step forward and cost nothing for them to devise a sensible rule book that is applied impartially and without exception. That would at least ensure that the various competitions, league, KO Cup etc., have a greater degree of credibility.

Unfortunately, I have little confidence that we shall ever see it considering that the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the BSPA and the SCB were involved in the farce we witnessed involving the guests for the play off final.  They obviously thought that the best solution to the problem was to ignore the rules.

What rules were ignored? As has been established elsewhere Morris average was lower than Kurtz so was eligible to guest at home and away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Skidder1 said:

What rules were ignored? As has been established elsewhere Morris average was lower than Kurtz so was eligible to guest at home and away.

No he wasn't eligible for the away meeting. The official averages  to include the Swindon v Belle Vue meeting on the 27 September have not yet been issued according to the SGB website and those in force were those shown in issue 27 on the SGB website.

That is in accordance with the following;

16.2.1.4 Updated MA’s will be calculated monthly on a rolling basis on all eligible meetings, up to and including 23rd of the month to become effective from the 1st of the following month.   

Edited by Aces51
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Steve Shovlar said:

The announcer at Kings Lynn said that Morris was able to ride as the 5% extra for home meetings had been extended to away fixtures as well.

There is no supplementary regulation on the SCB website that would confirm that to be true. Wasn't it just an agreement reached between the 2 teams, BSPA and SCB, which is unfortunately, typical of the way the sport is run and why it lacks any credibility.

The 5% at home can be argued as justified because most riders have a higher home average than their GSA but the opposite is true of away averages and makes adding 5% ridiculous.

 

Edited by Aces51
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Steve Shovlar said:

The announcer at Kings Lynn said that Morris was able to ride as the 5% extra for home meetings had been extended to away fixtures as well.

So Lynn can use R. Worrall at Somerset.. ??? Toft 5.65..... Worrall 5.81 .. fits with the 5%.. Or was the 5% away rule for 1 meeting only?

Edited by Bald Bloke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aces51 said:

There is no supplementary regulation on the SCB website that would confirm that to be true. Wasn't it just an agreement reached between the 2 teams, BSPA and SCB, which is unfortunately, typical of the way the sport is run and why it lacks any credibility.

The 5% at home can be argued as justified because most riders have a higher home average than their GSA but the opposite is true of away averages and makes adding 5% ridiculous.

 

How 2019 will work.

Teams built for winning at home only. Away from home teams will ride with 7 guests who are track specialists to that paticular track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy