Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Kings Lynn v Leicester Wednesday September 5th double header


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, g13webb said:

Maybe he should... But only a fool would agree to dates that would mean riding without your full team of riders.     but please don't let reality get in the way of  responsibility...

When Matt Ford  instigated having Wednesdays as one of the fixed race night, he knew the 2nd divisions teams  would consolidate  his suggestion that allowed Poole to retain their normal race night.    What a pity he didn't think more about the sport, rather  than his own personal  situation.     As soon as the FRN were assigned to Mondays and Wednesdays, it was a decision that meant the days when the Danes rode in our league were numbered.     Signing  3 Danish riders,  Kings Lynn were  always going to suffer the consequences of these clashing dates.  coupled to that the 6 cancelled meetings, that we have suffered,  plus the Rye House withdrawal,  you understand  the inevitable problems with the fixtures...

So when there was an impasse at the AGM over the Mon/Thurs FRN, with Championship clubs refusing to support what had already been agreed with FIM, what alternative night should have been proposed by MF or any other Premiership promoter for that matter? Poole can run M/W/Th/F with sufficient notice, but the SGBC clubs would not have supported Fridays either (they have enough problems fitting their Friday fixtures in now!!)

 

Edited by Skidder1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steve0 said:

How many teams have had to arrange double headers this season and how many have had/are having a second double header - just the one #justsaying

Just one, that being the team full of Danish riders who therefore had to have lots of blank Wednesdays as most of our team were riding in their homeland. Chuck in two or three rain offs and you get the need for two double headers. At least they are in the school holidays and in decent weather but certainly very much less than ideal, and it needs sorting for next year.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is whoever agreed Monday and Thursday with the FIM, without first making sure it would be approved at the AGM, who are to blame for the eventual fiasco at the AGM.

Other than through injuries, illness and other unforeseeable circumstances, it shouldn't happen that teams have to ride league and cup fixture without heat leaders. Unfortunately, in the disorganised world of UK speedway it seems beyond the ability of those in charge to organise a fixture list that avoids it. However, until those in charge get their act together, we have to live with it and I don't remember many King's Lynn supporters complaining when they came to the NSS when we were missing Cook, Fricke and the injured Worrall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Aces51 said:

It is whoever agreed Monday and Thursday with the FIM, without first making sure it would be approved at the AGM, who are to blame for the eventual fiasco at the AGM.

Other than through injuries, illness and other unforeseeable circumstances, it shouldn't happen that teams have to ride league and cup fixture without heat leaders. Unfortunately, in the disorganised world of UK speedway it seems beyond the ability of those in charge to organise a fixture list that avoids it. However, until those in charge get their act together, we have to live with it and I don't remember many King's Lynn supporters complaining when they came to the NSS when we were missing Cook, Fricke and the injured Worrall.

I can remember several of us commenting on how we were in the right place at the right time and had been fortunate to meet you on that night. Also as it was a GP qualifier (which shouldn’t be raced on Mondays anyway as it’s a UK race day) it could easily have been Iversen & Lambert missing that night.

Your last sentence rather spoils what was up til them a very good post. Our fixture list is a shambles and I think Lynn favs are entitled to express their displeasure.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bagpuss said:

I can remember several of us commenting on how we were in the right place at the right time and had been fortunate to meet you on that night. Also as it was a GP qualifier (which shouldn’t be raced on Mondays anyway as it’s a UK race day) it could easily have been Iversen & Lambert missing that night.

Your last sentence rather spoils what was up til them a very good post. Our fixture list is a shambles and I think Lynn favs are entitled to express their displeasure.

I said that I didn't remember many complaining and you say several did. Not much of a difference between not many and several.

Don't get me wrong, it's human nature for more people to complain when it affects them. It's not just a King's Lynn thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aces51 said:

It is whoever agreed Monday and Thursday with the FIM, without first making sure it would be approved at the AGM, who are to blame for the eventual fiasco at the AGM.

Other than through injuries, illness and other unforeseeable circumstances, it shouldn't happen that teams have to ride league and cup fixture without heat leaders. Unfortunately, in the disorganised world of UK speedway it seems beyond the ability of those in charge to organise a fixture list that avoids it. However, until those in charge get their act together, we have to live with it and I don't remember many King's Lynn supporters complaining when they came to the NSS when we were missing Cook, Fricke and the injured Worrall.

Had Lynn agreed for Belle Vue to postpone the meeting for a more convenient time ,      we could have ended up with another Double Header.    How unselfish of Lynn to do that.:t:  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, g13webb said:

Had Lynn agreed for Belle Vue to postpone the meeting for a more convenient time ,      we could have ended up with another Double Header.    How unselfish of Lynn to do that.:t:  

No, we wouldn't have had any trouble fitting it in especially now we know that PL teams can race on Tuesdays and Thursdays. That does apply to everyone, doesn't it? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying it was right to play that fixture,   merely pointing out we were running out of available dates on the calender to reschedule it.    Yes we could have used Tuesdays and Thursdays,    but then again,   like you we would have had riders missing.    This ridiculous fixture schedule was created because the BSPA weren't strong enough to enforce them FIM guidelines...     

Just another example of the tail wagging the dog   :nono: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Steve0 said:

How many teams have had to arrange double headers this season and how many have had/are having a second double header - just the one #justsaying

King's Lynn don't have to run the double header against Leicester but they didn't want to leave it to chance.With actually riding the 2nd meeting on the actual cut-off date.If Somerset,Poole and Swindon didn't run on an off night who's to say they wouldn't have needed a double header.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, tellboy said:

King's Lynn don't have to run the double header against Leicester but they didn't want to leave it to chance.With actually riding the 2nd meeting on the actual cut-off date.If Somerset,Poole and Swindon didn't run on an off night who's to say they wouldn't have needed a double header.

Correct - it’s Kings Lynn - no one else!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy