r8gdp Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Because the two poles nearest woffy in the so called title chase are in the same race the most corrupt thing I ve ever seen made a mockery of the gp this year 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 As proved in heat 18, the decision by the ref was completely corrupt. The FIM need to open an investigation immediately. Whilst it won’t alter what happened, it could ensure the ref is never near the start button ever again. I would go even further and get the fraud squad to check his bank accounts to see if any money has been recently been deposited. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chunky Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Just now, Steve Shovlar said: As proved in heat 18, the decision by the ref was completely corrupt. The FIM need to open an investigation immediately. Whilst it won’t alter what happened, it could ensure the ref is never near the start button ever again. I would go even further and get the fraud squad to check his bank accounts to see if any money has been recently been deposited. I also think it is interesting that the commentary has now been "silenced"... Steve 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Lady Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 3 minutes ago, chunky said: The rules are there apparently for the ref to apply how and when he feels... Steve EDIT: As was just said, the "rule" wasn't applied in Heat 18 I'm not defending the refs decision in either race but it could be argued that the other three were at tapes and had they moved when they went up would have got a warning. i think the ref is a prat but Woffy should not have given him an excuse to exc him when up against his biggest rival. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R87 Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 I suspect whats done Woffinden was how far back from the tapes he was. The other three riders are up at tapes, but not Woffinden. On that basis, the correct decision. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r8gdp Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 What happened in heat 18 I ve turn it off too bloody annoyed to carry on watching Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Bloke Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, Steve Shovlar said: As proved in heat 18, the decision by the ref was completely corrupt. The FIM need to open an investigation immediately. Whilst it won’t alter what happened, it could ensure the ref is never near the start button ever again. I would go even further and get the fraud squad to check his bank accounts to see if any money has been recently been deposited. There not that daft Just seen a still shot at 00 on the clock. Exclude 3 or none.. What a crock of poo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Lady Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Pearson says a new control box going into refs box, maybe it should be a new ref going in the control box! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chunky Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Just now, mb1990 said: I suspect whats done Woffinden was how far back from the tapes he was. The other three riders are up at tapes, but not Woffinden. On that basis, the correct decision. Nope. As Philip stated, they have to "be ready to race", not just "at the tapes". As was just confirmed on the commentary. Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiveusaB Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 17 minutes ago, Leicester Lion said: Woffinden gave the ref a reason to exclude him. Riders know they have to be ready even if the others are not. are you polish by any chance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSmiler Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Can we exclude the referee on accounts of delaying the meeting? 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Just now, mb1990 said: I suspect whats done Woffinden was how far back from the tapes he was. The other three riders are up at tapes, but not Woffinden. On that basis, the correct decision. No it wasn't. .. None of the riders were ready to race at 0.00... They should all have gone... 'Not being as ready as the other riders that are also not ready either' isnt a rule. ... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chunky Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Just now, Bald Bloke said: There not that daft Just seen a still shot at 00 on the clock. Exclude 3 or none.. What a crock of poo. Exactly... Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Clemens Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Amusing how't pundits are debating who should be excluded when it's pretty self evident why't ref excluded wooffie who strangely didn't seem bothered by it all. And folk wonder why speedway is seen as a joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 3 minutes ago, Mr. Clemens said: Amusing how't pundits are debating who should be excluded when it's pretty self evident why't ref excluded wooffie who strangely didn't seem bothered by it all. And folk wonder why speedway is seen as a joke. winner of the most ridiclous post goes too ... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r8gdp Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Mr. Clemens said: Amusing how't pundits are debating who should be excluded when it's pretty self evident why't ref excluded wooffie who strangely didn't seem bothered by it all. And folk wonder why speedway is seen as a joke. Still think it's corrupt you exclude one you exclude them all but they're polish aren't they it s as bent as a nine bob note as my grandfather used to say 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R87 Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 1 minute ago, mikebv said: No it wasn't. .. None of the riders were ready to race at 0.00... They should all have gone... 'Not being as ready as the other riders that are also not ready either' isnt a rule. … Your right. However Woffinden was farther back from the tapes than the other three riders who are at least at the tapes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LagutaRacingFan Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Why did Cook not let Woffinden pass? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Lady Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Just now, JeremyCorbynFan said: Why did Cook not let Woffinden pass? Why should he. That would make him as corrupt as some alledge the ref is. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 3 minutes ago, mb1990 said: Your right. However Woffinden was farther back from the tapes than the other three riders who are at least at the tapes. Is there rule about how far back you are from the tape ? Doubt it. This stinks to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.