Glasgow v Berwick - Championship 27/7/18 @ 7.30pm

[Mark]

4 hours ago, screm said:

Nathan was kept in hospital over night for observation but he has escaped without any broken bones, whether he will take his place tonight remains to be seen.

just seen the photos, awful crash, he's been very lucky.    good luck to him.

[DSC67]

Quote

 

Was a really good meeting last night, first time I've been at Ashfield since the redevelopment and I have to say I was impressed Speee could do with a few more facilities like this .The photos show just how alarming the accident looked from my position on the back straight. I'm amazed he's managed to escape with just a minor injuries. In most other sports there'd be no chance of him competing tonight but this is speedway and the guys are a special breed . 

Edited July 28, 2018 by DSC67

[screm]

43 minutes ago, Mark said:

just seen the photos, awful crash, he's been very lucky.    good luck to him.

Having seen the photos of last nights accident I find incredible that Nathan Greaves will be racing at Berwick tonight, but racing he is.

[Mark]

25 minutes ago, screm said:

Having seen the photos of last nights accident I find incredible that Nathan Greaves will be racing at Berwick tonight, but racing he is.

Incredible.    Teak tough.

[GS550]

16 hours ago, Bandit59 said:

Good DVD to get then

So after a post saying.....

"Not heard anything would imagine a trip to Hospital after the meeting to get checked over would be on the cards.

Was a horrendous crash though and went into the ambulance on the board."

 

.....you say "Good DVD to get then"

 

So you think its good to see an horrendous crash inflicting injury to a rider that requires to be taken away to an ambulance? 

 

EDIT:
Bandit59 has since answered no and it was just unfortunate that his post was straight after the one it just happened to follow.  All good.     I've personally never been one for viewing crashes and especially bike crashes, having had bikes myself (not speedway ones) and injuries I hate to see crashes and injured riders and it doesn't matter which team they ride for be it Berwick, Ipswich, Lakeside, anybody, I hate to see crashes and injured riders, that was my concern and good to see Bandit59 clarified it, thanks.

Edited July 28, 2018 by BigBoaby

[GS550]

13 hours ago, Gazc said:

Not heard anything would imagine a trip to Hospital after the meeting to get checked over would be on the cards.

Was a horrendous crash though and went into the ambulance on the board. 

 

Fingers crossed for the lad

[Bandit59]

23 minutes ago, BigBoaby said:

So after a post saying.....

"Not heard anything would imagine a trip to Hospital after the meeting to get checked over would be on the cards.

Was a horrendous crash though and went into the ambulance on the board."

 

.....you say "Good DVD to get then"

 

So you think its good to see an horrendous crash inflicting injury to a rider that requires to be taken away to an ambulance? 

 

There's always one do you have a selective reading problem ?What about all the comments on the good racing that took place still if that's what you think makes a good DVD thats up to you

[dontforgetthefueltapsbruv]

https://twitter.com/glasgowtigers/status/1023150648089559040?s=19

 

[balderdash&piffle]

49 minutes ago, Bandit59 said:

There's always one do you have a selective reading problem ?What about all the comments on the good racing that took place still if that's what you think makes a good DVD thats up to you

Not unusual for a lot on here to read something that was not said, then interpret it what they think you meant.

[Bandits4eva]

First time I’ve been to Glasgow at night and WOW.. what a difference! £17 entry which I would pay over and over again if all meetings were of that quality! A meeting and a half and one I will be getting the DVD of! Absolutely gutted to have left with nothing though... turning point for sure was the TS Glasgow had to use! Hope we can pinch the poInts tonight but I wouldn’t be surprised to see Glasgow take them! Their heat 13 & likely 15 riders could do us over again! 

[GS550]

2 hours ago, Bandit59 said:

There's always one do you have a selective reading problem

I asked a civil question.  No need for an abusive and juvenile response.

[GS550]

1 hour ago, balderdash&piffle said:

Not unusual for a lot on here to read something that was not said, then interpret it what they think you meant.

Hi b&p.  Not the case in this instance, and as one of the more intelligent on here b&p you will see that I made a perfectly reasonable question, and it was a only a question thereby giving the poster a reasonable opportunity for an equally reasonable answer, nothing else.  That the poster chose to respond with an abusive and juvenile response twisted the whole thing to be something it never was and certainly nothing to do with my reasonable question.  Cheers.

[allthegearbutnaeidea]

54 minutes ago, BigBoaby said:

Hi b&p.  Not the case in this instance, and as one of the more intelligent on here b&p you will see that I made a perfectly reasonable question, and it was a only a question thereby giving the poster a reasonable opportunity for an equally reasonable answer, nothing else.  That the poster chose to respond with an abusive and juvenile response twisted the whole thing to be something it never was and certainly nothing to do with my reasonable question.  Cheers.

No you was trying to make him look bad, you didn’t just ask the question, you asked it whilst insinuating that that is what they were doing. 

[Gazc]

1 hour ago, Bandits4eva said:

First time I’ve been to Glasgow at night and WOW.. what a difference! £17 entry which I would pay over and over again if all meetings were of that quality! A meeting and a half and one I will be getting the DVD of! Absolutely gutted to have left with nothing though... turning point for sure was the TS Glasgow had to use! Hope we can pinch the poInts tonight but I wouldn’t be surprised to see Glasgow take them! Their heat 13 & likely 15 riders could do us over again! 

Glad you enjoyed it was a fantastic meeting and both teams deserve credit.

Track has been improving week on week and the standard has improved ten fold since the start of the season.

[GS550]

1 hour ago, allthegearbutnaeidea said:

No you was trying to make him look bad, you didn’t just ask the question, you asked it whilst insinuating that that is what they were doing. 

False.  I simply asked a question, nothing more nothing less.  It was a civil question deserving only of a civil answer nothing more.

[Bandit59]

N

3 hours ago, BigBoaby said:

False.  I simply asked a question, nothing more nothing less.  It was a civil question deserving only of acivil answer nothing more.

No true if you read my earlier post about the meeting just asking a question was posted this morning before I went to work was unfortunate that it followed those posts

[GS550]

19 minutes ago, Bandit59 said:

N

No true if you read my earlier post about the meeting just asking a question was posted this morning before I went to work was unfortunate that it followed those posts

Well, the only person that could answer the question was yourself and you have now answered no - that was all I expected to begin with.

You now also appear to get why I asked, as you say it was "unfortunate" that your particular post immediately followed a couple of other posts and to be honest it didn't look great, hence why I put the context of the posts it followed and asked you a perfectly legitimate question.  On a positive footing It gave you the opportunity to answer and clarify.  All fair enough.

Thanks.

 

[Bandit59]

11 hours ago, BigBoaby said:

Well, the only person that could answer the question was yourself and you have now answered no - that was all I expected to begin with.

You now also appear to get why I asked, as you say it was "unfortunate" that your particular post immediately followed a couple of other posts and to be honest it didn't look great, hence why I put the context of the posts it followed and asked you a perfectly legitimate question.  On a positive footing It gave you the opportunity to answer and clarify.  All fair enough.

Thanks.

 

The way you posed the question was insinuating i was only interested in the DVD was because of the unfortunate crash to Nathan which was not the case.

[GS550]

On ‎7‎/‎29‎/‎2018 at 10:16 AM, Bandit59 said:

The way you posed the question was insinuating i was only interested in the DVD was because of the unfortunate crash to Nathan which was not the case.

False.  I merely asked a question, nothing else.  The only way to ask was to give the context why I was asking.  Why be so negative?  There was not one shred of negativity on my part, why must people be so determined to be so negative.  In fact I tried to assist you by seeing the context and recognising that it didn't look great and I gave you the opportunity to clarify.  As I've said, the only person that could answer the question was yourself.  Likewise the only person that can answer your false accusation is me and I can tell you one hundred percent that I did not do as you have falsely accused me of, I only asked a question, if you are determined to make something of it that it simply never was then that is your problem.  The fact remains that I only asked a question.  Human beings are intelligent beings but they all too often take something that simply isn't there as you have done.  You were the only person that could answer the question I asked and I am the only person that can answer your false accusation and you should similarly accept that there was no intent whatsoever and I am deeply offended by your false accusation., you are wrong sir, your assumption is misplaced and factually incorrect.

I also edited the original post so as to reflect your clarification as that was the decent thing to do.  I am deeply offended by your false accusation.  You should also have the decency to accept my clarification.

Edited July 31, 2018 by BigBoaby

[Bandit59]

Yes fair enough we both misinterpreted each others posts all fair in love and war