dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted May 4, 2018 Report Share Posted May 4, 2018 4 hours ago, Daniel Smith said: I believe IRR isn't allowed if RR is already in operation. If a team is using R/R and a rider gets injured, the injured rider's rides can only be taken by reserves or 3 rider only heats. Altered over the winter Ironically probably due to the KOCup final last year when Ipswich lost a rider in each leg when already using rr and now possibly the first team to utilise the change Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattK Posted May 5, 2018 Report Share Posted May 5, 2018 22 hours ago, racers and royals said: SR1807 amendment(clarifaction) has been issued and there is NO word OR in the sentance (R/R TS IRR) then it says and or heat 15 Clearly you are right, however on first reading (and without comparing it to the original rule) my interpretation was OR rather than AND. Why didn't they write the rule as: Quote 18.14.3 A Team Member (1 to 5) is subject to: 18.14.3.1 A maximum of 4 programmed rides 18.14.3.2 The possibility of one nomination as a R/R 18.14.3.3 The possibility of one nomination as a IRR 18.14.3.4 The possibility of one nomination as a TS 18.14.3.5 The possibility of a nomination for Heat 15 18.14.3.5 A maximum of 7 rides in total Does anyone else find the way the supplementary rules are issued incredibly complex? Why not simply update the main regulations and what a "Changes and Amendment" section at the front to track the updates? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttons Posted May 5, 2018 Report Share Posted May 5, 2018 You couldn't make it up, no wonder Promoters have problems understanding the rule book, they need to throw it away and start again, too many amendments Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcatdiary Posted May 6, 2018 Report Share Posted May 6, 2018 On 05/05/2018 at 10:50 AM, Buttons said: You couldn't make it up, no wonder Promoters have problems understanding the rule book, they need to throw it away and start again, too many amendments It’s been mentioned every year since the year dot and every year it gets worse I have mentioned several times that the BSPA and the SCB should state what they require for the season and leave it to someone like Tony Steele to write it, so here we are in May and we have already had 7 amendments not including the recent change to GSA which to date still hasn’t been amended, BSPA promoters sat round a table coming up with wonderful ideas each year isn’t the way to do it. On the R/R and IRR debate I think it should be one or the other not both, teams using RR should be made to use a no 8 who has the same standing as a reserve, the fact that teams using RR can and often do lose another rider during the meeting just highlights the shortcomings of the facility. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.