Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Charlie Webster - Malaria


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, steve roberts said:

...personally I rarely bother trawling thru' to see if there is a similar thread on any particular subject before starting one.

Quite agree, as some folks don't have the time that others think everyone else has. There are two threads on Ivan Mauger, but has anybody been hurt by this rule breaking ? Some folks need to grow up and get on with their lives.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tsunami said:

Quite agree that there is some pathetic statement on here from folks who should know better. Many like me, still think he was hardly innocent, but a powerfull expensive lawyer employed by his then girlfriend and now wife's father,  managed to get the decision they were after. Money still talks eh.

Money does talk but there was no way money or no money that should have him guilty in fact the case should have never gone to court as  the case was so weak .

As for Webster she should have kept her nose out ..I hope she can do a better job at this than she did at speedway presenting as she was hopeless at that .

 

Edited by orion
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, orion said:

Money does talk but there was no way money or no money that should have him guilty in fact the case should have never gone to court as  the case was so weak .

As for Webster she should have kept her nose out ..I hope she can do a better job at this than she did at speedway presenting as she was hopeless at that .

 

Sneaking into a hotel illegally, and jumping on after your mate with a female not fit to defend herself, is alright in your eyes is it. Specsavers for you then. Some of us have higher, or just have, some morals unlike some.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tsunami said:

Sneaking into a hotel illegally, and jumping on after your mate with a female not fit to defend herself, is alright in your eyes is it. Specsavers for you then. Some of us have higher, or just have, some morals unlike some.

When was even showed with out doubt that she was not fit to defend herself ? that was all about opinion ...quite clearly the court thought otherwise as  they  returned not  guilty verdicts once all the facts come to light .having bad morals and being found guilty of rape are two different things completely something that you and the likes Webster fail to understand 

The bottom is some girl thought It was fun to get off with some footballers then cry rape in the morning and try to cash in on it ...if that is your high morals your welcome to them .

 

 

 

Edited by orion
more info
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, orion said:

When was even showed with out doubt that she was not fit to defend herself ? that was all about opinion ...quite clearly the court thought otherwise as  they  returned not  guilty verdicts once all the facts come to light .having bad morals and being found guilty of rape are two different things completely something that you and the likes Webster fail to understand 

The bottom is some girl thought It was fun to get off with some footballers then cry rape in the morning and try to cash in on it ...if that is your high morals your welcome to them .

 

 

 

Do you every have the brains to read about what you comment on.

The first court found Ched guilty, but a high paid lawyer paid for by a rich daddy got him off.

The girl was pissed and being carried. She went to the Police the following day to report a lost purse, and when they heard the circumstances they told her she had been raped.

Stick to your Whoosh as its the only thing your post worthy reading . More crap from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tsunami said:

Do you every have the brains to read about what you comment on.

The first court found Ched guilty, but a high paid lawyer paid for by a rich daddy got him off.

The girl was pissed and being carried. She went to the Police the following day to report a lost purse, and when they heard the circumstances they told her she had been raped.

Stick to your Whoosh as its the only thing your post worthy reading . More crap from you.

? She made her way to the Hotel Room with out any help ..Yet again it was a matter of opinion if she was pissed ..looking at the amount she had  drunk it was highly unlikely and  she was in control of what she was doing, and quite clearly the jury agreed .

It was a weak case and in the end justice was served ..sadly you have become a bitter loser as the case never went the way you hoped..

 

Edited by orion
.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, orion said:

? She made her way to the Hotel Room with out any help ..Yet again it was a matter of opinion if she was pissed ..looking at the amount she had  drunk it was highly unlikely and  she was in control of what she was doing, and quite clearly the jury agreed .

It was a weak case and in the end justice was served ..sadly you have become a bitter loser as the case never went the way you hoped..

 

Oh dear. Getting comments like that from orion and being liked by the squeaky clean Midland Red. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, orion said:

? She made her way to the Hotel Room with out any help ..Yet again it was a matter of opinion if she was pissed ..looking at the amount she had  drunk it was highly unlikely and  she was in control of what she was doing, and quite clearly the jury agreed .

It was a weak case and in the end justice was served ..sadly you have become a bitter loser as the case never went the way you hoped..

 

But one jury didn't

you seem to know a lot about the evidence were you in court on both occasions listening to it all?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Third Man said:

But one jury didn't

you seem to know a lot about the evidence were you in court on both occasions listening to it all?

One jury never had all the facts ..once the second  did of course it only took them 2 hours after a 8 day case to clear him ..not sure you have to be Perry Mason or to be in court to figure out what that meant .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, orion said:

One jury never had all the facts ..once the second  did of course it only took them 2 hours after a 8 day case to clear him ..not sure you have to be Perry Mason or to be in court to figure out what that meant .

 

so I take you weren't there then so you don't know the facts, OK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, The Third Man said:

so I take you weren't there then so you don't know the facts, OK

The facts are that Evans was  found not  guilty in   two hours ..unless your saying that is untrue of course ? 

Edited by orion
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy