Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Workington v Edinburgh CS 14/04/18 7:00pm


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Gazc said:

Why ride in the first place if that is the case , if Edinburgh had won last night would they still be whingeing about this and appealing, you can bet your bottom dollar the answer would be no.

 

They rode the match thinking lets see how this goes lost the match then started the appeal talk.

Workington should be sitting back laughing at this p*ss poor effort to overturn a result it makes you look very petty.

The appeal has to be made before the meeting, but okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr Blobby said:

Nothing to do with the loss, sounds like we didn’t de serve to win it’s more the rules not being applied.

The club are I’m led to believe are appealing on the fact that Proctor who currently isn’t allowed to ride in the UK and shouldn’t be declared in a teams 1-7. Meaning that a guest shouldn’t have been allowed and a NL guest should’ve took his place. 

 

WRONG BLOBBY . PROCTOR IS ALLOWED TO RIDE IN THE UK . get your facts right . 

and also if proctor is not allowed to ride in the uk . how come workington could/should have had a N.L. guest for someone that is not allowed in a teams 1/7 . 

riddle me that !

Edited by jenga
its sunday , i am bored .
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr Blobby said:

CURRENTLY I said jenga my friend 

You need to be worrying more about the rest of your team , bar , Wells and Riss the others pretty average !

Ty is allowed to ride in the UK, he’s riding for Kings Lynn , I’m sure Tony Jackson would have looked into the rules of 2018 before getting the guest in , riding under protest ... yawn ! 

Edited by Taylorj
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scaramanga said:

that would be my thinking aswell 

but if bomber going poland on the saturday they wont come 

probably wait till workington got riders missing before accepting a date 

 

Solution there is don't offer a date you have riders missing simples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Taylorj said:

You need to be worrying more about the rest of your team , bar , Wells and Riss the others pretty average !

Ty is allowed to ride in the UK, he’s riding for Kings Lynn , I’m sure Tony Jackson would have looked into the rules of 2018 before getting the guest in , riding under protest ... yawn ! 

Our team will do just fine thanks for your concern though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gazc said:

Why ride in the first place if that is the case , if Edinburgh had won last night would they still be whingeing about this and appealing, you can bet your bottom dollar the answer would be no.

 

They rode the match thinking lets see how this goes lost the match then started the appeal talk.

Workington should be sitting back laughing at this p*ss poor effort to overturn a result it makes you look very petty.

100% incorrect.

The appeal has to and was placed prior to the start of the match as per the procedures for this kind of thing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MD said:

Surely Glasgow will fill one of these blank fixtures with the recent rain off.

Heard Glasgow had be offered the chance to return to Derwent park the next 2 reserved dates ie the next 2 weekends but decided not to come for whatever reason, at this rate it is gonna be like last year running early season trophy matches at the end of season, what is the point of having reserved fixtures for rain offs if no one what's to come.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

edinburgh get beat by one of the so called poorer  teams in the league and then they start looking as how they can justify the loss to their  supporters .

(oops, seems i have missed the capital E off ) 

maybe it something to do with the fact that ty rode for workington last season . at the moment its all bullshot from scotland ! (no big S on that one either .

i once rode under protest, she made me do it !

 

Edited by jenga
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, gmuncie said:

100% incorrect.

The appeal has to and was placed prior to the start of the match as per the procedures for this kind of thing.

So that makes it right was taking part in the meeting knowing what happened in it maybe make the result irrelevant does that make it right, also as I say if Edinburgh had won how would the appeal go then.

Edited by Gazc
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Gazc said:

So that makes it right was taking part in the meeting knowing what happened in it maybe make the result irrelevant does that make it right, also as I say if Edinburgh had have won how would the appeal go then.

What would you have suggested as the other course of action then?

Refuse to ride wasting the time of all who had made the effort to arrange to travel and costing Workington a call off they can’t afford? 

The outcome of the meeting has no bearing on the appeal if the Monarchs won they would have carried on with it as quite frankly answers are required as to why a Workington have been allowed to declare an inelligible 1-7. 

Edited by gmuncie
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Worky's line up was illegal it would be utterly ridiculous as the missing piece of paperwork is down to the relevant authorities and no fault of rider or club. What good would it do speedway to have Proctor replaced by an NL rider? 

IF the rule is there it has to be enforced but in this case the law would be a complete ass.

Edited by Bagpuss
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he is not ineligible Proctor has his visa and cleared to ride in the other league, going by what is being said here there has been a hold up with other paperwork hardly Workington's fault.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Gazc said:

But he is not ineligible Proctor has his visa and cleared to ride in the other league, going by what is being said here there has been a hold up with other paperwork hardly Workington's fault.

What I don't understand is if BSPA and ACU control British speedway,how can he be eligible in 1 league but not the other. .I know there are different Tiers regarding employment but surely his paperwork would cover these situations and he would be told what the position is regarding his application at the same time .Strange IMO . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Redcar had a rider in their team who was in the same position as ty . Redcar signed him but were unable to use him due to the same paperwork issue . does that make Redcars team illegal as well . think holder is having the same probs as well . Poole not playing by the rules , surely not !

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Poole signed a rider until Holders paperwork was cleared what Workington should have done. Last week he was declared  to ride against Glasgow twice still no paperwork a week later  [first time I have agreed with Mr Blobby ] got a visit to the doctors sorted

 

Edited by MANSE
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy