Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Sheffield v Newcastle 05.04.18


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, soupy said:

Last night nobody as it was the first competitive meeting if you could of done.The riders rode to thereaverage Robson -2.02& Lindgren -5.21 is not riding to there average to me.

What are those riders averages away from home?  Robson getting paid 6 I would suggest is bang on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, idanthyrsus said:

What are those riders averages away from home?  Robson getting paid 6 I would suggest is bang on.

Robson maybee yes but not Lindgren by a long way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Newcastle saw it more of a "blowing the cobwebs off" of a match, since it was our first meeting (with not even a press/practice day beforehand. Especially as we've neverdone particularly well at Sheffield even with a lot stronger top end. And Sheffield have had at least one fixture as all there team, as far as I'm aware, rode in Steady's testimonial. No reason to panic just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, romans lovechild said:

and what about the new rule of riders staying astride their machines whilst gardening,does that not apply in this competition?

in one race there was 2 riders off their machines gardening(and one wasnt lasse) 

Does not apply at all now rule amended.  http://www.speedwaygb.co/news.php?extend.34055

Edited by racers and royals
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the criticism of lindgren is completely unfair ............ hes a 3rd heat leader not a no 1 ... and he has never pretended to be a no 1

hes riding out of position as is robbo

the team - despite being tryers - is an awful team

whilst our reserves on paper are the 2nd best in the league .............  1 to 5 as a unit are not good enough and will be ripped apart by any decent side - and lets be honest Sheffield are a potentially league winning side.......

we won 1 heat ............  and if another person says we have strength in depth ............  ffs ....wake up .....we are not Hull 2004

3 maximums scored by opposition ....... whilst we have this team in the 28 competitive matches we will have I reckon will have a record 36 maximums scored against us this season ............. and no rider will score a max for the diamonds

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know he’s not a no 1 and to be fair he has been put in a difficult situation by the make up of the team/promotion but 3 points even for a no3 should be better, however it’s the first meeting of the season,no practice day got to cut him a bit of slack if he rides to his average there can be no complaints

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robbieblackadder fan club said:

We all know he’s not a no 1 and to be fair he has been put in a difficult situation by the make up of the team/promotion but 3 points even for a no3 should be better, however it’s the first meeting of the season,no practice day got to cut him a bit of slack if he rides to his average there can be no complaints

Would you say Redcar are equally as awful as us then based on the result at Scunny and I think they had 3 maxs against them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, robbieblackadder fan club said:

We all know he’s not a no 1 and to be fair he has been put in a difficult situation by the make up of the team/promotion but 3 points even for a no3 should be better, however it’s the first meeting of the season,no practice day got to cut him a bit of slack if he rides to his average there can be no complaints

It’s not just this season though is it? Most seasons he’s ridden for us mainly at number 4 and some of his away performances are pathetic for someone of his ability and experience. Although I do agree it’s not his fault he is tasked with being our number 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, graz gp said:

The rule was changed before any meetings had been run. But i don't know why. Does anyone know?

On reflection I believe they came to the conclusion that it gave the taller riders an unfair advantage as they could reach the ground easier and dig deeper trenches! Personally I would like to see riders settled and up to the tapes BEFORE the two minute time allowance expires, not just being astride their bike at the start and faffing around for several minutes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, diamond@heart said:

Would you say Redcar are equally as awful as us then based on the result at Scunny and I think they had 3 maxs against them?

nearly .............. they certainly wont be in the playoffs

however they may have the bragging rights of the north finishing 8th ... above us workington and berwick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, mauger65 said:

nearly .............. they certainly wont be in the playoffs

however they may have the bragging rights of the north finishing 8th ... above us workington and berwick

You may be right with that one based on current lineups, but I don't expect us or them to finish with our starting line-up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎06‎/‎04‎/‎2018 at 8:58 AM, Cue Ball said:

Haven’t double points gone now? And somebody said last night that you couldn’t use tac subs in this competition... don’t know how true that is, maybe they just couldn’t persuade anybody to have the extra ride

Tactical Substitute rule does not apply in any competition which is played out over two legs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy