Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Swindon 2018


Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, DC2 said:

 

No, seriously, Chris looked ready to jack it all in last year and a bad start could see him working behind the scenes. It wouldn’t surprise me to see him working for Jack or Nick.

Really.Was probably on a 2 or 3 k guarantee at Lynn? and couldn't be arsed to ride,cause the track was tricky.Don't need money.Don't care

Edited by Bald Bloke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

on the" greyhound star" website it appears builders barrets have wrote to the council with concerns re noise from the speedway,as the existing stadium is going to be refurbed and not relocated to the corner of the site the houses are now closer than originaly  planned(.cant do the link)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, poole keith said:

on the" greyhound star" website it appears builders barrets have wrote to the council with concerns re noise from the speedway,as the existing stadium is going to be refurbed and not relocated to the corner of the site the houses are now closer than originaly  planned(.cant do the link)

Well if they cant stick to the original plans and the stadium not being relocated is a problem to the houses then the houses need to be demolished.....

That makes sense to me!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the proposed New Stadium has been built in Kit form as detailed previously, who paid for it and who is paying the storage charges, as it was stated that it is finished and awaiting construction. Also, having visited the Abbey last season and seen the housing development, I can't see any way the Stadium can survive, as it is on prime construction land. Alarm bells should have been ringing when all the delays over drainage problems turns into a statement that Stadium can't be relocated, but housing can be built. The next will be that the New grandstand will now replace the old one, and once demolished nothing else will get built. If Barretts have sold houses on the pretext of Stadium being moved, then who is liable, and are there any plans available to show what exactly Barretts have permission to build and where.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, rocket007 said:

If the proposed New Stadium has been built in Kit form as detailed previously, who paid for it and who is paying the storage charges, as it was stated that it is finished and awaiting construction. Also, having visited the Abbey last season and seen the housing development, I can't see any way the Stadium can survive, as it is on prime construction land. Alarm bells should have been ringing when all the delays over drainage problems turns into a statement that Stadium can't be relocated, but housing can be built. The next will be that the New grandstand will now replace the old one, and once demolished nothing else will get built. If Barretts have sold houses on the pretext of Stadium being moved, then who is liable, and are there any plans available to show what exactly Barretts have permission to build and where.

At present the plans are for the track to be shortened, the new stand will go on the back straight & then the old stand will be demolished. However, I have serious doubts as to whether the new plans will be passed by the local authority. The letter from Barratt Homes has been very well written by their solicitors & lays it very firmly in the stadium's owner's responsibility to ensure that there is no noise nuisance from "greyhound racing, speedway & the car parks". It further go's on to say that the local authority needs to ensure that these terms are met or either present or future tenants will have good reason to complain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DunRobin said:

At present the plans are for the track to be shortened, the new stand will go on the back straight & then the old stand will be demolished. However, I have serious doubts as to whether the new plans will be passed by the local authority. The letter from Barratt Homes has been very well written by their solicitors & lays it very firmly in the stadium's owner's responsibility to ensure that there is no noise nuisance from "greyhound racing, speedway & the car parks". It further go's on to say that the local authority needs to ensure that these terms are met or either present or future tenants will have good reason to complain.

Barretts letter may be an attempt to preempt the Government's proposal to shift the responsibility of dealing  with any noise nuisance  onto the developer rather than the venue when new houses are built near an existing music or sports venue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, HertsRacer said:

Barretts letter may be an attempt to preempt the Government's proposal to shift the responsibility of dealing  with any noise nuisance  onto the developer rather than the venue when new houses are built near an existing music or sports venue. 

But Stadia UK have screwed up by moving the position of the "new" stadium to the position of the existing one which is nearer new houses they have already built rather than having it next to the road which was away from them.

I would rather keep the present site but this may open up a can of worms and give Stadia UK more continual excuses to not proceed with the stadium development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, A ORLOV said:

But Stadia UK have screwed up by moving the position of the "new" stadium to the position of the existing one which is nearer new houses they have already built rather than having it next to the road which was away from them.

I would rather keep the present site but this may open up a can of worms and give Stadia UK more continual excuses to not proceed with the stadium development.

Have Stadia UK screwed up or is this all part of their stalling tactics?

If planning permission is refused, this allows Stadia UK to dramatically throw their hands in the air and proclaim "we tried our best". If permission does get granted, what's the betting development gets tied up in "legal wranglings" between Stadia UK and the housing developers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MattK said:

Have Stadia UK screwed up or is this all part of their stalling tactics?

If planning permission is refused, this allows Stadia UK to dramatically throw their hands in the air and proclaim "we tried our best". If permission does get granted, what's the betting development gets tied up in "legal wranglings" between Stadia UK and the housing developers.

Could well be more stalling tactics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, martinmauger said:

Speaking personally, if it weren't so far away I'd swing by the storage facility for my own interest to look at the stadium sections for comparison with the rendered picture graphics ....

I'm not Sherlock Holmes! How does one find a fictitious Storage facility? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy