Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Wolves 2018


Recommended Posts

Lets hope its all just precaution and no serious issue is actually there :(

All the best Nathan - the thoughts of the Massif are with you :t:

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely now it’s time to make changes?? Dropping out the top 4 and still getting very little away is now costing us.

Obviously it’s going to depend on who is available and wants to come but I seriously hope the management are now looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stevebrum said:

Surely now it’s time to make changes?? Dropping out the top 4 and still getting very little away is now costing us.

Obviously it’s going to depend on who is available and wants to come but I seriously hope the management are now looking.

Adams said a few weeks ago that they certainly aren't sitting around and twiddling their thumbs at the idea of making changes. Yet, nothing has changed. 

The team was never good enough from the start, it was clearly built to just win home meetings. The fact they are surprised that it's failed to win away all season really is a bit odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stevebrum said:

Surely now it’s time to make changes?? Dropping out the top 4 and still getting very little away is now costing us.

Obviously it’s going to depend on who is available and wants to come but I seriously hope the management are now looking.

Hard to see what we can do.

We seem to have missed the boat again.

Not much room for manoeuvre - can't see any of the top 3 being dropped although Jacob's form has been in and out and Rory seems to have hit a lull in scoring - quite worrying as he looks likely to be number one in the new averages.

Would be tough on Howarth but he might have to be dropped with Heeps to allow for some scope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Racin Jason 72 said:

How heeps has lasted this long is beyond me. 

We really should have got rid of him a month ago. Trouble is he dropped to reserve and I guess they thought he may score decent points there. It really hasn't worked for him but the trouble is his average is so low now that our only hope is he suddenly finds his form again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After last night we might as well see if Bacon wants the gig once Nathan has recovered, at least he was putting in some effort. As others have said the horse has bolted, the 'we're waiting to see how the removal of the Rye House scores affects the averages' comment was a load of gollox to keep the easily pleased happy.

As much as we laugh at Ford for chopping, changing and showing bugger all loyalty, at least he's trying to do more than win home matches & scrape into the playoffs.

After doing a great job the last couple of years CVS has resorted to type, 'do sod all, the season will soon be over'.

Edited by Wolfsbane
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Perton Wolf said:

Adams said a few weeks ago that they certainly aren't sitting around and twiddling their thumbs at the idea of making changes. Yet, nothing has changed. 

The team was never good enough from the start, it was clearly built to just win home meetings. The fact they are surprised that it's failed to win away all season really is a bit odd.

I tend to disagree that the team on paper looked a top 4 team and whilst we have very little to show from our away performances we have in the vast majority of meetings stormed into a pretty strong lead before capitulating in the 2nd half.

That to me shows capabilities of winning away but then either failing to react to track changes or conditions to lose that promising start to meetings.

I believed all along we were a top 4 looking side but Heeps has been the biggest let down whilst Schlein has perhaps been the biggest surprise. 

Whilst it would be wrong on someone like Howarth to get the push if there was a chance to bring someone like Piotr Pawlicki in his place and maybe Bacon for Heeps I’ve no idea if that would work points wise, it would be silly to not make that move now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 31 July 2018 at 10:06 PM, stevebrum said:

Whilst it would be wrong on someone like Howarth to get the push if there was a chance to bring someone like Piotr Pawlicki in his place and maybe Bacon for Heeps I’ve no idea if that would work points wise, it would be silly to not make that move now.

 

Pawlicki on 8.00 and a 2.00 rider would be under the limit and while he has had a mixed season, maybe some extra meetings may help him get back on form but you also have the likes of Kenneth Bjerre or Peter Kildemand more likely and can win races away which has been a problem for Wolves on away tracks. 

 

Heeps has has been the big let down as he came in as a five plus rider that needed to be pushing six to seven but is struggling to maintain a four average and his recent high scores were mainly gained by beating weak reserves 

 

To make the play offs Wolves need to really win two of their remaining away meetings especially when you see Belle Vue still have to go to Leicester and a win there would put Wolves down to sixth place in a league of just seven

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, INCOGNITO said:

 

Pawlicki on 8.00 and a 2.00 rider would be under the limit and while he has had a mixed season, maybe some extra meetings may help him get back on form but you also have the likes of Kenneth Bjerre or Peter Kildemand more likely and can win races away which has been a problem for Wolves on away tracks. 

 

Heeps has has been the big let down as he came in as a five plus rider that needed to be pushing six to seven but is struggling to maintain a four average and his recent high scores were mainly gained by beating weak reserves 

 

To make the play offs Wolves need to really win two of their remaining away meetings especially when you see Belle Vue still have to go to Leicester and a win there would put Wolves down to sixth place in a league of just seven

With wolves being over the points limit it's like for like changes only 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, mark.1 said:

With wolves being over the points limit it's like for like changes only 

I was under the impression you could make up to 2 changes without redeclaring and what you do with their averages is up to you. Similar to what we did last year dropping Clegg and Skornicki and bringing in Riss and Schlein

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Call me wolfie said:

I was under the impression you could make up to 2 changes without redeclaring and what you do with their averages is up to you. Similar to what we did last year dropping Clegg and Skornicki and bringing in Riss and Schlein

You made them changes last year before your first set of averages which was ok to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, INCOGNITO said:

This change would put them under 42.5 so can happen if riders available 

Like I said you are over the points limit and it's like for like changes until you drop below the 42.50 limit so forget your pawlicki idea 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mark.1 said:

Like I said you are over the points limit and it's like for like changes until you drop below the 42.50 limit so forget your pawlicki idea 

Like I said, even if it was Pawlicki the team would be under the limit so within the rules

 

not saying it would be Pawlicki but 

 

8.54 Schlein,  8.13 Masters, 8.00 Pawlicki, 7.87 Thorssell, 4.37 Morris,  3.30 Greaves, 2.00 Clegg - Total 42.21 

 

using Bjerre 7.54 or Kildemand 7.10 would make that total even lower

Edited by INCOGNITO
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, INCOGNITO said:

Like I said, even if it was Pawlicki the team would be under the limit so within the rules

 

not saying it would be Pawlicki but 

 

8.54 Schlein,  8.13 Masters, 8.00 Pawlicki, 7.87 Thorssell, 4.37 Morris,  3.30 Greaves, 2.00 Clegg - Total 42.21 

 

using Bjerre 7.54 or Kildemand 7.10 would make that total even lower

Plus if you use the examples of Woryna, Kildemand, and Szczepaniak they all came in on old averages so Pawlicki would be 7.32.

even better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy