Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peterborough Panthers 2018


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, scaramanga said:

id say some promoters dont have the time to travel abroad for a meeting that is dictated by promoters who hold high positions in the sport

this is british speedway the meeting should be held in britten and it should involve all who want to take part the following season

 

britten!!        You should apply to join the BSPA. You'll go far

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Argos said:

What else do Peterborough expect, due to the Promoters being excluded from attending AGM due to their disgraceful BungGate actions 

It happens irrespective of attendance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, bigcatdiary said:

Surely the answer is to not let make the rules at all, they just are not trustworthy and competent to do it.

Trustworthyness is not the main issue, it's transparency and communication that's the problem although I suppose that it's one and the same thing really. They need to draw a line now and say that the past is the past and that there are no precedents for decisions going forward. Then they have to clearly explain how future decisions are reached so that everone is clear. There are no favours or special dispensation. If the lunatics want to run the asylum, and they cleary do, then they've got to start being competent. Tough ask I know but while we still have some sport left it'd be a good idea!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Panthers89 said:

So we had the Hokey Cokey cup, now we have a Hokey Cokey team, shambles.

Who had the last laugh there? Coventry gone. Both clubs having to suffer the supremo. Panthers nearly gone a couple of times at least since and now mid table lower tier struggling to put a team together? Hopefully plan A or B come off and are a surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, JeremyCorbynFan said:

If Nicholls is blocked from riding in the Championship, it will be a huge own goal by the BSPA.

The fans want to see Nicholls riding in the Championship, Peterborough aren't asking for any advantage!

What I would like to know is why was this rule made at all ?, for what reason ?,  would like the SCB to publish an explanation of the  reasoning behind it ,as we all know we will not get one from the BSPA ,

jimg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jimg said:

What I would like to know is why was this rule made at all ?, for what reason ?,  would like the SCB to publish an explanation of the  reasoning behind it ,as we all know we will not get one from the BSPA ,

jimg 

They believe it would make the two leagues too close to the same standard 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jimg said:

What I would like to know is why was this rule made at all ?, for what reason ?,  would like the SCB to publish an explanation of the  reasoning behind it ,as we all know we will not get one from the BSPA ,

jimg 

It was only last season that the rule wasn't in place....so it's not a new rule.

Harris took advantage last year when the rule was not in place, Scott didn't...Although he was offered a place at one club he chose not to take it because of the money on offer.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Baldyman said:

It was only last season that the rule wasn't in place....so it's not a new rule.

Harris took advantage last year when the rule was not in place, Scott didn't...Although he was offered a place at one club he chose not to take it because of the money on offer.   

You have to Question the logic of changing the the rule for one season only.It proves that last years doubling up theory was totally stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Crump99 said:

Trustworthyness is not the main issue, it's transparency and communication that's the problem although I suppose that it's one and the same thing really. They need to draw a line now and say that the past is the past and that there are no precedents for decisions going forward. Then they have to clearly explain how future decisions are reached so that everone is clear. There are no favours or special dispensation. If the lunatics want to run the asylum, and they cleary do, then they've got to start being competent. Tough ask I know but while we still have some sport left it'd be a good idea!

Trouble is they don’t do transparency and communication either, but n fact I am struggling to suggest anything they do well apart from complete incompetence.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy