New era Panthers Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 My vote goes to Bratley. We wouldn't be in this mess if they'd had him onside even though orion thinks that Bratley can't run a bath But surely you just can't send a representative , I thought this meeting was exclusive to promoters only and as he's not a promoter then he wouldn't be allowed to represent the club.Have to agree with you though Mick knows the business has been there before and he lives locally but would he want to be involved again . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wealdstone Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 So you think that in uk speedway should able to take bungs to allowed riders to miss matches and be replaced by nl riders etc ....you take money for that sort thing in any sport and likely to get a life ban ...so yes it is boro's fault and yes he got off lightly ..take your Boro blinkers off and wake up . So you think that it is perfectly acceptable for another club to close and make long suffering fans suffer? I have long held the view that in a sense owners and promoters hold the club in trust for fans, past . present and future. It is simply not fair for those fans to carry the can when that trust is betrayed ( in the view of some) 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Max Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Well clearly at some point it was sanctioned, otherwise we wouldn’t have been allowed to use him, it’s the constant jumping through hoops that’s starting to grate, same with Harris this year but of course everyone then had no problem using him as a guest. You don’t know the half of it. It was sanctioned AFTER Peterborough changed their racenight, as had been advised when the signing was proposed. So please explain which half I don't know about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orion Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 So you think that it is perfectly acceptable for another club to close and make long suffering fans suffer? I have long held the view that in a sense owners and promoters hold the club in trust for fans, past . present and future. It is simply not fair for those fans to carry the can when that trust is betrayed ( in the view of some) People's actions will always cause hurt to others ...the bottom line is you can't allowed people to take bungs just because they say they are going to close the club down ...he took dirty money and should pay it back ..if the club closes then he will be one to blame . What rules do you want ? clubs to do what they want because they might close the club down otherwise ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wealdstone Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 It was sanctioned AFTER Peterborough changed their racenight, as had been advised when the signing was proposed. So please explain which half I don't know about? The race night was the problem so it was changed. Can't see what point you are making People's actions will always cause hurt to others ...the bottom line is you can't allowed people to take bungs just because they say they are going to close the club down ...he took dirty money and should pay it back ..if the club closes then he will be one to blame . What rules do you want ? clubs to do what they want because they might close the club down otherwise ? OK from your point of view if a person commits crime their whole family should be punished .It used to be called "to encourage others" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orion Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 The race night was the problem so it was changed. Can't see what point you are making OK from your point of view if a person commits crime their whole family should be punished .It used to be called "to encourage others" As I said in life people actions will effect and hurt others, surely you understand that ?..the person who commits the crime should understand consequences it will have on others (his family ) before doing it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crump99 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Yea Boro lost was Birmingham gain what a job he done there . Won a trophy which is more than you've ever done (egg and spoon in Swindon girls U15 doesn't count ). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevehone Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 i still think there's more to this involving Poole. Jack Holder was going to ride for Torun whatever, but i think there was no way Poole were going to let him get a 28 day ban and miss out on Jack leading up to the playoffs, so i wouldn't be surprised if there was 'advice' from the south coast also regards giving permission and taking the money 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 i still think there's more to this involving Poole. Jack Holder was going to ride for Torun whatever, but i think there was no way Poole were going to let him get a 28 day ban and miss out on Jack leading up to the playoffs, so i wouldn't be surprised if there was 'advice' from the south coast also regards giving permission and taking the money To which it will obviously swept under the carpet and never to be brought out in the open. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crump99 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 But surely you just can't send a representative , I thought this meeting was exclusive to promoters only and as he's not a promoter then he wouldn't be allowed to represent the club.Have to agree with you though Mick knows the business has been there before and he lives locally but would he want to be involved again . I'm sure that he'd have to be on the books pdq. No idea whether they have a qualifying period for experienced promoters in such a case. I'm pretty sure that he'd be interested if the deal and conditions were right. He's probably a bit more picky these days as to what he'll do and where he'll go. i still think there's more to this involving Poole. Jack Holder was going to ride for Torun whatever, but i think there was no way Poole were going to let him get a 28 day ban and miss out on Jack leading up to the playoffs, so i wouldn't be surprised if there was 'advice' from the south coast also regards giving permission and taking the money Let's hope that because that qualifies for a second idiot badge. It reminds me of "Divine is summoned to the palace following Swindon defeat" - He's the one we pay to do all of the work and take all of the blame! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wealdstone Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 As I said in life people actions will effect and hurt others, surely you understand that ?..the person who commits the crime should understand consequences it will have on others (his family ) before doing it There are certainly places in the world that would subscribe to your views on justice and punishment, fortunately they are becoming fewer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panther1997 Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 i still think there's more to this involving Poole. Jack Holder was going to ride for Torun whatever, but i think there was no way Poole were going to let him get a 28 day ban and miss out on Jack leading up to the playoffs, so i wouldn't be surprised if there was 'advice' from the south coast also regards giving permission and taking the money To which it will obviously swept under the carpet and never to be brought out in the open. I honestly don't know, where you people get your disgusting opinion, of speedways finest Matt Fraud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 If matt had something to do with it , why not drop him in it like he did Godfrey?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluTiger Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 If matt had something to do with it , why not drop him in it like he did Godfrey?? Maybe the horse's head in his bed made him think twice 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudflaps Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 My vote goes to Bratley. We wouldn't be in this mess if they'd had him onside Oh Please - Colin Hortons best mate! Move on there's nothing to see here!! At least the commute to the EOES would be somewhat shorter than Geds! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Stewart Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 Edinburgh's away match at Peterborough was rained off on 1st October, and the programme was re-used for Workington's visit on the 6th with a wrapround. Is there anyone who has this 1st October programme and would be willing to sell it? (Ideally I am looking for 9 copies!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcatdiary Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 Edinburgh's away match at Peterborough was rained off on 1st October, and the programme was re-used for Workington's visit on the 6th with a wrapround. Is there anyone who has this 1st October programme and would be willing to sell it? (Ideally I am looking for 9 copies!) Have you tried emailing the club, or the Barbers who run our trackshop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Stewart Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 Have you tried emailing the club, or the Barbers who run our trackshop. I understand the club throw them away, but I will try the Barbers, thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcatdiary Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 The race night was the problem so it was changed. Can't see what point you are making OK from your point of view if a person commits crime their whole family should be punished .It used to be called "to encourage others" Oh yeah it was changed It used to be Fridays & Sundays Now it’s Sundays & Fridays 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crump99 Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 Oh Please - Colin Hortons best mate! Move on there's nothing to see here!! At least the commute to the EOES would be somewhat shorter than Geds! You're sticking pins in that voodoo doll as we speak, praying that nobody takes the suggestion seriously to bring together the Butler/Bratley dream team you get on so well with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.