New era Panthers Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 3 minutes ago, Crump99 said: Felt the same last year but if needs must I think that all options should be considered properly. He'd have to change that bloody awful tune though! He's the only stand out rider that maybe available at this point, it's not a question of his ability but more about availability and ethics involved . Fans should remember he was only part of the blame for what happened in 2017 . I must admit to sitting on the fence in this instance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattfordfan Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 16 hours ago, New era Panthers said: Poole fan telling Panthers who they should sign , he's had some very poor meetings as well at the showground . Just think he would be a good fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcatdiary Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 Personally if he would ride for us I would have him tomorrow, he certainly isn’t getting many rides for Torun this year. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattfordfan Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 2 hours ago, Baldyman said: Probably forgot to sign into the account name he uses when on panthers threads. Only got one account......I'm allowed to share the same view as the majority on here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crump99 Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, New era Panthers said: He's the only stand out rider that maybe available at this point, it's not a question of his ability but more about availability and ethics involved . Fans should remember he was only part of the blame for what happened in 2017 . I must admit to sitting on the fence in this instance. Surely it was his choice where he rode so I'm afraid that he was wholly to blame and others got caught up trying to make the best of a bad deal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maneacat Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 10 minutes ago, Crump99 said: Surely it was his choice where he rode so I'm afraid that he was wholly to blame and others got caught up trying to make the best of a bad deal. Yes that was my take on the whole sorry mess but it never felt like Jack and Ged parted company on bad terms so never say never - just get the T's crossed and the I's dotted to make his contract watertight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crump99 Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 1 minute ago, maneacat said: Yes that was my take on the whole sorry mess but it never felt like Jack and Ged parted company on bad terms so never say never - just get the T's crossed and the I's dotted to make his contract watertight. I'd agree with that but I doubt that Poland and watertight are compatible at the end of the day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimg Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 9 hours ago, Panthers89 said: Kus for Grøndal makes sense, he rides well around the EOES and he was a 7.50 average rider, he can’t be any worse than a 5.20 untried rider IMO. 9 hours ago, Panthers89 said: Kus for Grøndal makes sense, he rides well around the EOES and he was a 7.50 average rider, he can’t be any worse than a 5.20 untried rider IMO. I would go KUS as reserve for Tom Bacon, and bring in a 5 plus to ride at No 2, with BWD at 3 would be strong all way down, and if Emil gets back to fitness we have an option. Thats if Ged cannot get another Kennet Type Jimg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluPanther Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 1 minute ago, jimg said: I would go KUS as reserve for Tom Bacon, and bring in a 5 plus to ride at No 2, with BWD at 3 would be strong all way down, and if Emil gets back to fitness we have an option. Thats if Ged cannot get another Kennet Type Jimg Good call, but i have my doubts that Bacon will be sacrificed. Kus would be a match winner at reserve that's for sure ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wealdstone Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 As far as I am concerned Holder is Persona Non Grata Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 1 hour ago, maneacat said: Yes that was my take on the whole sorry mess but it never felt like Jack and Ged parted company on bad terms so never say never - just get the T's crossed and the I's dotted to make his contract watertight. Looking at the latest set of averages issue 9 which is dated 04/ 06 / 18 Panthers would not be able to fit Jack Holder In as we only have 6.94 to play with and yet on the previous set dated 31 /05 /18 7.48 was enough to take team total to the max 42.50 and in between these dates we havn't had any meetings so how can they alter like this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 4 minutes ago, blupanther said: Good call, but i have my doubts that Bacon will be sacrificed. Kus would be a match winner at reserve that's for sure ... I have a feeling Tom Bacon might well be sacrificed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crump99 Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, New era Panthers said: Looking at the latest set of averages issue 9 which is dated 04/ 06 / 18 Panthers would not be able to fit Jack Holder In as we only have 6.94 to play with and yet on the previous set dated 31 /05 /18 7.48 was enough to take team total to the max 42.50 and in between these dates we havn't had any meetings so how can they alter like this Best not to delve. I'm sure that someone understands it, or thinks that they do. That wasn't a prompt for anyone else! Edited June 5, 2018 by Crump99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crump99 Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 1 minute ago, New era Panthers said: I have a feeling Tom Bacon might well be sacrificed Surely if one of the reserves is off it'll not be Bacon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Crump99 said: Surely if one of the reserves is off it'll not be Bacon. Holder would be an ideal replacement if it would fit with averages and a guarantee not to miss any meetings , big doubt here and should that not be viable then I could see M.Kus coming in at reserve and a new to Britain rider on 5.20 coming in or maybe still use R/R for Grondal with the chance of a return when fit or still a possibility for Nicki Lunna . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilWatson Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 20 minutes ago, New era Panthers said: Looking at the latest set of averages issue 9 which is dated 04/ 06 / 18 Panthers would not be able to fit Jack Holder In as we only have 6.94 to play with and yet on the previous set dated 31 /05 /18 7.48 was enough to take team total to the max 42.50 and in between these dates we havn't had any meetings so how can they alter like this New averages were issued on 1st June (based on meetings up to 23rd May) which changed the team total and hence the scope for team changes. 15 minutes ago, Crump99 said: Best not to delve. I'm sure that someone understands it, or thinks that they do. That wasn't a prompt for anyone else! Sorry :-) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crump99 Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 6 minutes ago, New era Panthers said: Holder would be an ideal replacement if it would fit with averages and a guarantee not to miss any meetings , big doubt here and should that not be viable then I could see M.Kus coming in at reserve and a new to Britain rider on 5.20 coming in or maybe still use R/R for Grondal with the chance of a return when fit or still a possibility for Nicki Lunna . All sounds a right dogs dinner. I'll wait and see what transpires. Averages, permutations and rules just send me to sleep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 7 minutes ago, NeilWatson said: New averages were issued on 1st June (based on meetings up to 23rd May) which changed the team total and hence the scope for team changes. Sorry :-) So what does issue 9 04 / 06 / 18 have any meaning for or as it makes no sense to me and there can't be any other people who can understand it either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruffdiamond Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 20 minutes ago, New era Panthers said: So what does issue 9 04 / 06 / 18 have any meaning for or as it makes no sense to me and there can't be any other people who can understand it either. The 'Kennett Window' was opened and has now closed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted June 5, 2018 Report Share Posted June 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, ruffdiamond said: The 'Kennett Window' was opened and has now closed Your guess is as good as mine , how can any riders average change when they hav'n't ridden in any meetings between sets of averages issued ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.