Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Newcastle 2018


Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, idanthyrsus said:

Rather depends what was written in the contract :)  Unless we know that then everything else is mere speculation...

You either sign a season long loan contract, or say a 28 days loan contract. Terms are between the hiring club and the rider so there is no variables that are unknown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎6‎/‎4‎/‎2018 at 12:04 AM, StevePark said:

28 day facility for Lewis Rose ended tonight, so we either 1) have to sign someone for Scunthorpe on Friday, or, 2) it will be an NL guest.  Stuart Robson hopes to be back soon.   

 

6 hours ago, Tsunami said:

Of course everyone is missing the fact, especially with the dearth of riders that are free and available at the moment, that the Diamonds and George may have been given another 28 days extension which is normal practice for similar cases. #justsayinglike

This 'exception that is being taken by Berwick folks on this issue, must have spread to a certain member of their promotion, who pointed out that I was running the later NJL meeting  without any redflaggers in attendance tut tut. That was because it was between races and they had rakes in their hands at the time raking, and their flags were on the grass. I pointed them out individually to him, and gave him their names one at a time. It must of been something in the Berwick tea on Sunday tut tut.

It was your fellow Newcastle fan who brought the point up about the function running out not me.  I had no idea if Newcastle had another 28 day facility or not but as another Newcastle fan has basically said, if they have it should have been confirmed to the fans before Sunday's meeting.  #justsayinglike

Since I have taken exception could you explain why Newcastle fans are saying that a 28 day facility run out after 29 days.  Could you confirm what facilities are available to teams when a rider takes time out/retires?

Could you also confirm what other teams have had an extension to the facility for a rider retiring?  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, mauger65 said:

yep … the clock is ticking ………………  kus is sadly looking the obvious likely replacement as he is better than a nl guest and is ONLY ONE available and is ours ….. and apparently not riding much in Poland ………….

I don't have anything against kus ….  but when we have 9.24 available … to sign up a lad out of form on 4.76 is hardly progessive ……. but its a sad state of affairs we cant find anyone who will ride for us ….. poor promoters have only been looking for 4 months 

 

 

you heard it here first lol

I like kus and he's better than a nl guest ……… but this is hardly the signing we need ,,,,,,,,,,,,   our team average is now 37.50 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

more than capable of upping his average came to Berwick as a reserve ended up Number 1 the year we made playoffs

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tsunami said:

You either sign a season long loan contract, or say a 28 days loan contract. Terms are between the hiring club and the rider so there is no variables that are unknown.

You can write what you want in a contract - as long as both sides sign it.  It is then legally binding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, idanthyrsus said:

You can write what you want in a contract - as long as both sides sign it.  It is then legally binding.

Assuming the contents of the contract are legal in the first place ;)

Edited by KevH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tsunami said:

You either sign a season long loan contract, or say a 28 days loan contract. Terms are between the hiring club and the rider so there is no variables that are unknown.

The variables are by what contract was initially signed when somebody becomes an 'asset' of a club and claim to own a certain rider. If there is no contract then how any club can claim to own a certain rider is beyond me.

If there is a contract, it would be picked to pieces in a court of law.

Edited by Najjer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmm that's an interesting signing if true, I suppose he is better than a NL guest but not sure how it makes us stronger, we'll just have to wait and see. Scunthorpe should be interesting on Friday!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Tsunami said:

And what law is that then ?. A club, not using their asset, enters into a loan agreement with another club and the rider and everyone is happy. It doesn't work out, and the owning club tries to get him placed with another club and the releasing club gets back some of the loan fee. Who lost out and what law was broken. 

His contract was terminated, so anything in that contract would be void.  Are you saying therefore that loan fees have nothing to do with his contract whereby it does not apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, idanthyrsus said:

You can write what you want in a contract - as long as both sides sign it.  It is then legally binding.

The loan agreement is a standard document that all three party's sign to the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Najjer said:

The variables are by what contract was initially signed when somebody becomes an 'asset' of a club and claim to own a certain rider. If there is no contract then how any club can claim to own a certain rider is beyond me.

If there is a contract, it would be picked to pieces in a court of law.

You should know that there is a contract, and it is a standard document that both parties sign. The rider has a separate contract regarding his terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tsunami said:

The loan agreement is a standard document that all three party's sign to the deal.

Which is a very different thing to saying that we know everything in a contract.  I'm not precious about this, but it sounds like:

- All loan agreements are formed from standard templates that include the rider, the hiring club and the owning club

- All the termination clauses are therefore known and if the hiring club terminates the contract (presumably with some penalties?) then the rider will be contracted to the owning club

In which case we are all good :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, robbieblackadder fan club said:

It is what it is regarding loan fees but a very poor signing and leaves us with only 1 heat leader and a team of reserves and second strings 

Kus may not have been my choice but the fact is that (as La Dandelion has already pointed out) George, the team and Matej himself got him to a 7 point average in 2016.

It hasn't worked out for him at Redcar for whatever reason but it's in everyone's interests for him to have a very different second half of the season and I'm sure we'll all get behind him. Every team can find room for an out-and-out gater and he will have to be ours.

I've no idea how he goes round the EWR but I hope he gets off to a good start on Friday.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy