BWitcher Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 I made no accusation, I merely pointed out that the Workington management didn't have an issue with the situation. Your obsession with this issue is leading to immoderate language that isn't your usual style - stand back and accept that the facility was quite legitimate and all parties on Sunday acted correctly. Why the facility was granted is a different issue. The facility was NOT legitimate. If it was, provide the rule that allows it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racers and royals Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 The facility was NOT legitimate. If it was, provide the rule that allows it. Pretty sure they used 16.5.1 D- i posted it on the Chris Harris ban thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan_Jones Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 Pretty sure they used 16.5.1 D- i posted it on the Chris Harris ban thread. The ISLB, as it's name suggests, deals only with speedway meetings so that rule has no relevance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flappy Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 There appears to be a Panthers witch hunt since the Holder situation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
False dawn Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 There appears to be a Panthers witch hunt since the Holder situation No. Don't feel hard done by. For my part, I just want clarity. If something is done that is clearly going to cause controversy, is it not simpler to communicate that it is happening, why it is happening and what rules are in place to cover the situation? Either that, or you have to accept the conspiracy theories, speculation and general anger from the paying public (of which I was one). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racers and royals Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 The ISLB, as it's name suggests, deals only with speedway meetings so that rule has no relevance. For many years i have been flagging up these longtrack incorrect facilities so i very much agree with you- however i think that is the rule they have used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 For many years i have been flagging up these longtrack incorrect facilities so i very much agree with you- however i think that is the rule they have used. How can you use a rule that isn't relevant? The simple answer is, they haven't used a rule. It's not allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregory peck Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 I made no accusation, I merely pointed out that the Workington management didn't have an issue with the situation. Your obsession with this issue is leading to immoderate language that isn't your usual style - stand back and accept that the facility was quite legitimate and all parties on Sunday acted correctly. Why the facility was granted is a different issue.worky never have an issue with anything,we're the go with the flow club,if you'd booked wofinden as cover for Harris they wouldn't have objected 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 harris is a far better rider than the british aussie . more down to earth and a happy chap ALL the time .scruffy wuffy still has not grown up yet and the sooner he move back to stralia , the better for us all . harris wins hands down all the time for me . riding for or against us , he is still entertainment .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topsoil Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 harris is a far better rider than the british aussie . more down to earth and a happy chap ALL the time .scruffy wuffy still has not grown up yet and the sooner he move back to stralia , the better for us all . harris wins hands down all the time for me . riding for or against us , he is still entertainment .. Two world titles compared to never even close to one suggests Chris Harris is not a better rider. Harris is entertainment, yes, I really like watching him racing. But as good as Woffinden? Not even close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 you can put your tongue back in now , its brown enough ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topsoil Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 you can put your tongue back in now , its brown enough ! HP sauce? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 HP sauce? i will give you that one . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilWatson Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 The facility was NOT legitimate. If it was, provide the rule that allows it. Maybe read the other posts in this thread to understand the situation? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudflaps Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 HP sauce? Probably his Daddy's Sauce! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 Maybe read the other posts in this thread to understand the situation? I've read all the other posts and understand the 'situation' perfectly well. That doesn't change the fact that the facility was not legitimate. You cannot provide the rule that shows that it was legitimate can you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 I've read all the other posts and understand the 'situation' perfectly well. That doesn't change the fact that the facility was not legitimate. You cannot provide the rule that shows that it was legitimate can you? Why should he ,he's not responsible to you or anybody else . Try asking the ACU or BSPA 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 Why should he ,he's not responsible to you or anybody else . Try asking the ACU or BSPA Perhaps because he is claiming it is legitimate. I don't need to ask the ACU or the BSPA, I am able to read... something which many speedway fans seem incapable of.. their own worst enemy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluPanther Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilWatson Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 Perhaps because he is claiming it is legitimate. I don't need to ask the ACU or the BSPA, I am able to read... something which many speedway fans seem incapable of.. their own worst enemy! But it was legitimate in that the facility was awarded and used without protest or sanction. There seems to be a quest to find out who allowed the facility, and under what rule but that is a totally separate matter. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.