Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Rye House 2018


Recommended Posts

If a rider ever tries to free himself from this restraint, he could try buying himself out of it, offering say £1 to his "owners" who would presumably reject it and state their price.

In such a case, would the arbitration system apply? Or would it have to be adjudicated by a different court?

Would this be a possible way of rendering the asset system defunct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hamish McRaker said:

If a rider ever tries to free himself from this restraint, he could try buying himself out of it, offering say £1 to his "owners" who would presumably reject it and state their price.

In such a case, would the arbitration system apply? Or would it have to be adjudicated by a different court?

Would this be a possible way of rendering the asset system defunct?

There is another issue when a rider reaches his 18th birthday, who if riding prior to that date had his parents sign any riding contract, who then refuses to sign the contract offered, as the rider has becomes an adult and has to sign any agreements or contracts himself.   Any club wanting that rider could ignore any previous signed contract or agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Hamish McRaker said:

If a rider ever tries to free himself from this restraint, he could try buying himself out of it, offering say £1 to his "owners" who would presumably reject it and state their price.

In such a case, would the arbitration system apply? Or would it have to be adjudicated by a different court?

Would this be a possible way of rendering the asset system defunct?

I believe that within current regulations a rider is not permitted to own their own registration - it has to be an a promotion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

I believe that within current regulations a rider is not permitted to own their own registration - it has to be an a promotion

Correct, or by the BSPA on behalf of the absent team or promoter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Skidder1 said:

Linus is a Poole asset so why wouldn't he be in discussion with Poole?  He was first choice to replace the injured KK early last season but couldn't make the fixtures work for him, hence Poole getting Zengota instead!!

I never said he shouldn't be. My point is that we should have tried to sign him (we may well have but I doubt it). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a system! There has to be some control, in a reasonable and legal way, but this seems to be overly one-sided. A good lawyer would tear it to pieces.

When a rider signs his first UK club contract, does it really state that the club/promotion has those lasting rights over him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Hamish McRaker said:

What a system! There has to be some control, in a reasonable and legal way, but this seems to be overly one-sided. A good lawyer would tear it to pieces.

When a rider signs his first UK club contract, does it really state that the club/promotion has those lasting rights over him?

Yep - and no rider can compete without signing his registration to a promotion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tellboy said:

With the asset system,i don't get how you can own a rider so to speak without actually paying them.They are actually self employed or not surely?

Slavery was abolished nearly 200 years ago. Nobody is 'owned.'

What is owned is 'the contract'. Effectively the intangible asset of the right to enter into negotiations with a view to engaging the rider's services.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, arnieg said:

Slavery was abolished nearly 200 years ago. Nobody is 'owned.'

What is owned is 'the contract'. Effectively the intangible asset of the right to enter into negotiations with a view to engaging the rider's services.

 

 

Ok the contract being owned.But unlike other sports ie football,if a club owns the contract of a player they still have to pay him whether he plays or not.But in speedway then,the club owns the contract but don't have to pay him if he doesn't ride for them thus making kind of self employed.It is a weird set up don't you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So (with apologies to Rye House supporters whose thread this is!) what happens when a rider retires from speedway? Presumably his registration is cancelled, and the contract along with it? But then he subsequently un-retires ( eg David Howe)....does that contract resume as before, or is he free to obtain a new contract and registration with a new club?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hamish McRaker said:

So (with apologies to Rye House supporters whose thread this is!) what happens when a rider retires from speedway? Presumably his registration is cancelled, and the contract along with it? But then he subsequently un-retires ( eg David Howe)....does that contract resume as before, or is he free to obtain a new contract and registration with a new club?

The registration remains with the club indefinitely

In your example the club holding Davids registration before his retirement would still have held it upon his return

That club wouldve had first priority for his services and have had to agree to his signing elsewhere whilst also picking up a loan fee in that scenario

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

The registration remains with the club indefinitely

In your example the club holding Davids registration before his retirement would still have held it upon his return

That club wouldve had first priority for his services and have had to agree to his signing elsewhere whilst also picking up a loan fee in that scenario

So it sounds like death is the only way of revoking a contract unless a transfer is successfully completed. 

Brings that movie called The Firm to mind!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Triple.H. said:

I might be having a senior moment, but I seem to remember John Davis owning his own contract.

I believe you are right. A few looked to do it and soon the avenue was closed

Didnt take the clubs long to realise the future impact and put a stop to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, westhamboy66 said:

Yawn

shall we start a new Rye House 2018 thread  or better still discuss contracts, Poole rider negotiations etc etc elsewhere like say in a thread of there own. God this forum can be boring when a thread is hijacked

Not as boring as when a post neither adds anything to the ongoing discussion nor offers a new dimension or direction :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Triple.H. said:

I might be having a senior moment, but I seem to remember John Davis owning his own contract.

JD wasn’t the only rider to own his own  contract at that time there was another rider who also owned their own contract, but for the life of me I cannot remember who it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy