Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Kings Lynn Vs Wolves ( Double Header) 23.08,17


Recommended Posts

Ah but. As one poster has already pointed out, if you don't have the daft situation whereby you're riding against the same club twice, you already have 7 potential guests present for the second meeting.

There will always be "Ah but" situations.What if Lynn had 3 riders injured in the first 2 races of a normal match,what then.We would still have to ride on with 3 riders possibly.Wednesday night was just an unlucky night with injuries i suppose.It's a sport where riders often get injured it's just Lynn's all came at once.

Also the only other team that could possibly have come that night would have been Poole.Would they have been willing to come that night,possibly not as they have been down to ride at Lynn next week for quite some time and i suppose wouldn't want to alter all of their plans.

The only solution to all of this is to get matches rode more regularly rather than p**sing about with months of only 1 or 2 matches.Then you wouldn't have the need for double headers at the end of the season.

Edited by tellboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will always be "Ah but" situations.What if Lynn had 3 riders injured in the first 2 races of a normal match,what then.We would still have to ride on with 3 riders possibly.Wednesday night was just an unlucky night with injuries i suppose.It's a sport where riders often get injured it's just Lynn's all came at once.

All that is true. But play the percentages. Don't start 30 heats of racing with 6 riders, no number 8 and no chance of a late stand in.

And for goodness sake, don't ride against the same club twice on the same night. That's just plain daft.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Fair enough, I look forward to reading it :D War and Peace length is no problem, it's likely to be a long long winter :wink:

More so if the same prat stays in charge..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What rubbish,no team in the UK can afford to go to matches with a squad of ten riders,which would have been needed Wednesday.

I find the overrated riders are the ones who can't pass another rider while racing.I would rather watch a Lambert,Harris racing from the back than say a Hancock just leading from the front.The best sight in speedway is seeing someone busting a gut to try and pass another rider.

 

 

I think what makes the SGP series so exciting this year is that none of the top riders are consistently better than the rest out of the gate.

End of the day, you want to gate and win the race. Not sure riders get the same thrill from passing as us fans!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like somebody remarked, it should not come to double headers.

 

Do not the teams give a list of available racing dates to the

 

fixture secretary before the season starts ??

 

They should all be able to get their matches in to stop this

 

double bubble happening...

 

The fixture secretary needs changing,a lot of teams moaning about

 

going 3 weeks without a home fixture,and as of now and past seasons

 

teams trying to cram in maybe 2 matches a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Star Lady I am more that happy to write my opinion of British speedway. But let the season finish and I will write it. Might be War and Peace in length though lol

 

I think we will all look forward to it..,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What rubbish. Kings Lynn did field a competitive team but when you lose your top two riders and your best reserve to injury plus r/r what team in the world would have stand by options to cover that. No the second match should have been cancelled

 

you can't cancel a meeting just because one team can't field a team. What a dangerous precedent to set and a ridiculous suggestion in the first place,

 

a team competing at a so called professional level, in a so called Premiership

It's still the top level league we have so accurately called.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

you can't cancel a meeting just because one team can't field a team. What a dangerous precedent to set and a ridiculous suggestion in the first place,

 

 

It's still the top level league we have so accurately called.

I think a team done that a few years ago,i wonder who that was :shock:.And that was with them missing fewer riders.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a team done that a few years ago,i wonder who that was :shock:.And that was with them missing fewer riders.

But that was before a meeting took place, cancelled by the promotion citing 'damaging business' and not under the control of an official.

Wednesday night was much different reasons and as the ref has no power to cancel the meeting with riders and paying customers in the building meaning circumstances were not the same.

 

However I agree that the Poole cancellation set the precedent on cancelling meetings in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can't cancel a meeting just because one team can't field a team. What a dangerous precedent to set and a ridiculous suggestion in the first place,.

I agree which makes it all the more concerning that 3 members of the Management Committee attempted to persuade the referee to do just that.

 

It doesn't say a lot for the integrity of the MC does it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that was before a meeting took place, cancelled by the promotion citing 'damaging business' and not under the control of an official.

Wednesday night was much different reasons and as the ref has no power to cancel the meeting with riders and paying customers in the building meaning circumstances were not the same.

 

However I agree that the Poole cancellation set the precedent on cancelling meetings in advance.

hang on Steve, you say the Poole match was cancelled before it took place.. the 2nd meeting could (should) have been as well.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole event was an accident waiting to happen. Injury to any riders could always happen and when both teams were using RR the knock on effect is really damaging. Creating a new rule to stop teams from bringing in outside help for the play-off, has really compounded on those teams who could have done with the help.

 

Had we had sensible rules and responsible people in charge, Wednesday match against Wolves Could / Should be played for double points. Then we wouldn't been arguing the rights and wrongs of that second match fiasco. By making it compulsory to complete with only half the riders, the Ref turned the sport into a laughing stock.

 

Rules or no Rules !!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy