Gavan Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Tbh if it wasn't for the tactical we were well on the way to a 20 point loss! You used a tactical in the first meeting so no difference. I said it would be close and it was.......to be fair it was only Shovlar telling me i was wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 (edited) Tbh if it wasn't for the tactical we were well on the way to a 20 point loss! Strange maths you have there. You would have lost by ten without the tactical. The chance of a tactical would be factored in when analysing a meeting. Edited August 8, 2017 by BWitcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Strange maths you have there. You would have lost by ten without the tactical. The chance of a tactical would be factored in when analysing a meeting. A tactical working breeds confidence. If Wolves got a 5-1 instead of a Poole 8-1 you really think Poole would have got a 5-1 in the next race? All ifs and buts but we were 14 down going into the tactical race and if it hadn't of worked looking at 20 point defeat imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 (edited) A tactical working breeds confidence. If Wolves got a 5-1 instead of a Poole 8-1 you really think Poole would have got a 5-1 in the next race? All ifs and buts but we were 14 down going into the tactical race and if it hadn't of worked looking at 20 point defeat imo. In the first meeting you had a tactical and won the race 5-3 You followed that up with a 4-2, 5-1, 4-2, 5-1. This time you got a 5-1 because Schlein fell. You then didnt get a heat advantage so cant really say that this time it helped confidence, maybe more in the first meeting. You had a tactical in the first meeting and a tactical in the second. You lost because Thorsell and Lindgren did better than last time. And Hans didnt. Compensated a bit by Masters rides getting 5 and Kennett doubling KK's score Enough said about it now i said 6 point loss it was 7. I was told i know nothing before the meeting and was told that i was trolling that Poole would keep it close. Funny normally Shovlar and co are vocal towards me, they were before the meeting lol Edited August 8, 2017 by Gavan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 A tactical working breeds confidence. If Wolves got a 5-1 instead of a Poole 8-1 you really think Poole would have got a 5-1 in the next race? All ifs and buts but we were 14 down going into the tactical race and if it hadn't of worked looking at 20 point defeat imo. No ifs and buts, your opinion is irrelevant. Poole lost by 7. Gavan and indeed myself worked out Poole would likely lose by less than 10, most likely around 6 pts. That is what happened. Bet365 calculated something similar offering Poole +8. Ladbrokes and Coral were further out at +10 and I took advantage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 No ifs and buts, your opinion is irrelevant. Poole lost by 7. Gavan and indeed myself worked out Poole would likely lose by less than 10, most likely around 6 pts. That is what happened. Bet365 calculated something similar offering Poole +8. Ladbrokes and Coral were further out at +10 and I took advantage. Yet it so easily could have gone the other way, you certainly got lucky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.