Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Capacity Of Uk Speedway Stadiums


Recommended Posts

I thought Swindon (Blunsdon) was purpose built for Speedway with dogs coming later.

 

On defunct tracks - I also thought Reading (Smallmead) was purpose built and based on Wembley's track and Aldershot (Tongham) & Hull (Heddon) built for Speedway. Would not Rye House's original track and California (Wokingham) have been purpose built for Speedway ?

Can't believe I forgot that one :o. Without being too pedantic it's spelt Hedon, but pronounced 'Heddon', if you see what I mean. I know, time to get my coat. 68 years on, not surprisingly no trace left whatsoever left, justs a ploughed field though from aerial views it can made out the where the track was if one knows exactly where to look....

Edited by Martin Mauger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't believe I forgot that one :o. Without being too pedantic it's spelt Hedon, but pronounced 'Heddon', if you see what I mean. I know, time to get my coat. 68 years on, not surprisingly no trace left whatsoever left, justs a ploughed field though from aerial views it can made out the where the track was if one knows exactly where to look....

From arial views it is sometimes possible to see stone age or roman,viking structures etc,so as long as something hasn't been built on 68 years isn't very long at all.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On another thread there is a debate on could any other stadium in UK stage another GP. How big is the capacity of the different stadiums. I would think Ipswich would be one of the biggest

 

In my updates in regard to the comment by mickthemuppet as OP, I have always assumed the query to be in relation to current UK tracks suitable to stage a GP?

However, with so many tracks being put forward that have not been operational for years, I now wonder what the thread is all about? :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In my updates in regard to the comment by mickthemuppet as OP, I have always assumed the query to be in relation to current UK tracks suitable to stage a GP?

However, with so many tracks being put forward that have not been operational for years, I now wonder what the thread is all about? :unsure:

You just seem to be compiling a list of purpose built tracks,instead of tracks suitable to host a GP,so my guess is as good as yours :P:rofl:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In my updates in regard to the comment by mickthemuppet as OP, I have always assumed the query to be in relation to current UK tracks suitable to stage a GP?

However, with so many tracks being put forward that have not been operational for years, I now wonder what the thread is all about? :unsure:

 

 

You just seem to be compiling a list of purpose built tracks,instead of tracks suitable to host a GP,so my guess is as good as yours :P:rofl:

 

You win! I formally withdraw from the thread debate! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Wasn't the National Speedway Stadium built for this purpose - for main/major event speedway activities? :icon_smile_clown:

Why the clown face? The NSS has more than enough capacity for any domestic speedway meeting. With temp seating enough to host the SWC.

So the only thing it's not big enough to host is a GP, though if it did it would still have one of the highest GP attendances outside of Poland and Cardiff.

But surely it would have been madness to build a 40k seater on the basis of possibly getting a GP and filling it for one meeting, but having a 95% empty stadium for regular meetings?

So perhaps you can clarify who the clown is?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our sadly missed Dudley wood stadium was purpose built.( I think)?

It wasnt it was originally a football stadium.

 

The origins of the track date back to 1917 when the Cradley Heath St Lukes Football Club built a new ground after the First World War because the lease at their previous ground had expired. They found farmland that was suitable for a pitch and constructed a basic football ground and stadium east of the Dudley Wood Road.[3]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised it's as much as that tbh.

The capacity was probably close to Starmans figure before the terraced stand along the back straight was demolished to make way for the new one that has no spectator capacity, just a dogs betting area and restaurant with a couple of steps outside.

I've only been a couple of times since it's demise as I've no wish to arrive 3 hours before start time in order to find a place between the spread out tartan blankets on a back breaking bench in that old main stand or stand at track level on a bend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasnt it was originally a football stadium.

 

The origins of the track date back to 1917 when the Cradley Heath St Lukes Football Club built a new ground after the First World War because the lease at their previous ground had expired. They found farmland that was suitable for a pitch and constructed a basic football ground and stadium east of the Dudley Wood Road.[3]

Interesting. I had it in the back of my mind (a very cluttered place) that it was a football pitch. But Peter Foster's history of the club had a different story as mentioned by myself earlier in this thread. i.e. purpose built behind the Victoria Brewery. My Dad arrives this evening for a wee visit - he should know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any track that has an FIM licence. Only problem is you'd have to restrict capacity.

Leicester has an FIM licence but the capacity is only 4500

The new BV track was built within the confines of established buildings or other sports facilities. Morton and Gordon designed the best track they could within those confines, and what a brilliant job they did.

 

On the other hand, it seems Leicester missed a trick at Beaumont Park. They seem to have the space and a blank canvess, but not enough thought put into the design of the track, if there had been then perhaps Leicester would have been another "BV" and up for consideration for major FIM events. Sad really.

The money ran out at Leicester

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leicester has an FIM licence but the capacity is only 4500

The money ran out at Leicester

Surely it was ot lack of money that caused such a recognised poor track layout, which has had to be severely modified, and still not considered a good race track. Thats what I meant when I said Leicester seemed to have missed a trick.

Have a good race track, good promotion, that will surely bring in fans (if in a speedway area) which means more money to spend on the amenities in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it was ot lack of money that caused such a recognised poor track layout, which has had to be severely modified, and still not considered a good race track. Thats what I meant when I said Leicester seemed to have missed a trick.

Have a good race track, good promotion, that will surely bring in fans (if in a speedway area) which means more money to spend on the amenities in time.

That sums it all up really. If you have a decent Team and all of that in Speedway - you have everything.

 

Except an Independent body to manage the Sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it was ot lack of money that caused such a recognised poor track layout, which has had to be severely modified, and still not considered a good race track.

Why does it cost more to make a good track layout than a poor one? I could understand if it had to fit into an existing stadium or had other constraints, but it can't be that difficult to go and look at a few tracks considered 'good' and work out some ideal parameters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.... it can't be that difficult to go and look at a few tracks considered 'good' and work out some ideal parameters.

.

Its agreeing what's 'good' that's the problem. Different folk have different views.

Does anyone think he set about building Leicester so that it wouldn't be good ?

Yes, it clearly is difficult !

Edited by britmet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it was ot lack of money that caused such a recognised poor track layout, which has had to be severely modified, and still not considered a good race track. Thats what I meant when I said Leicester seemed to have missed a trick.

Have a good race track, good promotion, that will surely bring in fans (if in a speedway area) which means more money to spend on the amenities in time.

 

Why does it cost more to make a good track layout than a poor one? I could understand if it had to fit into an existing stadium or had other constraints, but it can't be that difficult to go and look at a few tracks considered 'good' and work out some ideal parameters.

 

Sorry HA, I missed the n at the beginning of the 4th word. Should have read "Surely it was not lack of money that caused such a recognised poor track layout" I agree with what else you said.

Dave Morton and Chris Morton took the effort to design a track for BV by going studying successful race tracks around the europe and maybe elsewhere, and put what they found into practice despite the track had restrictions of size due to other buildings already in place. Leicester looks if they had an open field to go at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Its agreeing what's 'good' that's the problem. Different folk have different views.

Does anyone think he set about building Leicester so that it wouldn't be good ?

Yes, it clearly is difficult !

The issue by all accounts is not listening to those who understood what as needed to make a good track. It's not rocket science - don't make the straights too long or the turns too sharp and make sure there is enough width? Model it on a track that has a similar size to work with that produces good racing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belle Vue did it the right way.

 

The evidence for this is the excellent Racing at the Track.

 

Their template should be used in any future (hopefully) new purpose built Tracks/Stadia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it was ot lack of money that caused such a recognised poor track layout, which has had to be severely modified, and still not considered a good race track. Thats what I meant when I said Leicester seemed to have missed a trick.

Have a good race track, good promotion, that will surely bring in fans (if in a speedway area) which means more money to spend on the amenities in time.

I dont know whether you have visited Beaumont Park this year but the racing is much improved now that both ends of the track have been adjusted. There was even several good races in the white wash of Kings Lynn recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy