foreverblue Posted July 19, 2017 Report Share Posted July 19, 2017 Lucky you, i haven't!! I have been we are **** even though we were winning at the time, also that we are cheats and we are winning at the time. Although i do cheer for Poole riders quite loud maybe that just pees them off! I expect it is a while since you have been, i suggest you give it another chance. Just mean't the people are generally polite. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted July 19, 2017 Report Share Posted July 19, 2017 (edited) Chatted to Shanes. No ef, no going to fall, just Greaves coming under and knocking him off. Couldn't believe he was excluded. His hand does not look pretty. Edited July 19, 2017 by Steve Shovlar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beowulf Posted July 19, 2017 Report Share Posted July 19, 2017 Chatted to Shanes. No ef, no going to fall, just Greaves coming under and knocking him off. Couldn't believe he was excluded. His hand does not look pretty. Better have a Parliamentary Inquiry then - referee got a decision wrong, whatever next ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted July 19, 2017 Report Share Posted July 19, 2017 Chatted to Shanes. No ef, no going to fall, just Greaves coming under and knocking him off. Couldn't believe he was excluded. His hand does not look pretty. Of course he isn't going to admit he leant all over Greaves because he was out of control. Quelle surprise. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superguest Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 (edited) Shanes was out of control (hanging off the bike) and turning in. Not sure what Greaves could do to avoid hitting him. As it goes, Poole gained from that decision as we were on a 4-2 with Starke out of the race. In the re run he won it comfortably. That race win for Max could have been all the difference for him confidence wise. Edited July 20, 2017 by superguest 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveZodiac Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Chatted to Shanes. No ef, no going to fall, just Greaves coming under and knocking him off. Couldn't believe he was excluded. His hand does not look pretty. Made a miraculous recovery to ride on Wednesday though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Made a miraculous recovery to ride on Wednesday though He hurt his hand quite badly. Not a pretty sight. Nothing miraculous at all. We would still have beaten Wolves had Shanes not been speared as he had the beating of Greaves and would have only have had three rides anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 He hurt his hand quite badly. Not a pretty sight. Nothing miraculous at all. We would still have beaten Wolves had Shanes not been speared as he had the beating of Greaves and would have only have had three rides anyway. What makes you think Shanes had the beating of Greaves? Greaves beat him twice at Poole and was in the process of overtaking him the other night when they fell. You wouldnt have beaten Wolves if Howarth and Shanes had completed the meeting. For once take off your blue tinted glasses and admit Poole were lucky in that respect. True Poole had to take advantage and they did. But the loss of Howarth and Shanes tipped the meeting into Pooles favour. So Shanes can hurt his wrist/hand and your ok with him pulling out Monday and riding Wednesday But you accuse Batchelor of making it up whne he pulls out Wednesday and rides Thursday?? Double standards yet again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Considering Chris Holder said last night there was nothing wrong with Batchelor I think I am on safe ground there. Shanes on the other hand was genuinely smashed off the bike by Greaves. You have already been picked up on this from Wolves fans who were actually at the meeting. Don't know how many times you need to be told. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealFiend Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 What makes you think Shanes had the beating of Greaves? Greaves beat him twice at Poole and was in the process of overtaking him the other night when they fell. You wouldnt have beaten Wolves if Howarth and Shanes had completed the meeting. For once take off your blue tinted glasses and admit Poole were lucky in that respect. True Poole had to take advantage and they did. But the loss of Howarth and Shanes tipped the meeting into Pooles favour. So Shanes can hurt his wrist/hand and your ok with him pulling out Monday and riding Wednesday But you accuse Batchelor of making it up whne he pulls out Wednesday and rides Thursday?? Double standards yet again! You never stop do you? Shanes would've beaten Greaves anyway. Everyone beats the Wolves reserves. We was always going to win. We were the better team. Considering Chris Holder said last night there was nothing wrong with Batchelor I think I am on safe ground there. Shanes on the other hand was genuinely smashed off the bike by Greaves. You have already been picked up on this from Wolves fans who were actually at the meeting. Don't know how many times you need to be told. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Considering Chris Holder said last night there was nothing wrong with Batchelor I think I am on safe ground there. Shanes on the other hand was genuinely smashed off the bike by Greaves. You have already been picked up on this from Wolves fans who were actually at the meeting. Don't know how many times you need to be told. your unreal. Did Chris Holder say that to you personally bless you. Shanes was 'smashed' off the bike lol. The Wolves fans on here have said it was 50/50 and the referee went against you. Go pick your dummy up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 your unreal. Did Chris Holder say that to you personally bless you. Shanes was 'smashed' off the bike lol. The Wolves fans on here have said it was 50/50 and the referee went against you. Go pick your dummy up. You are the unreal person. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 (edited) You never stop do you? Shanes would've beaten Greaves anyway. Everyone beats the Wolves reserves. We was always going to win. We were the better team. Everyone beats Wolves reserves lol Is that why Poole at home to Wolves were outscored 5 points to 6 points? And Shanes in the last 3 meetings v Wolves has finished in front of Wolves riders 6 times............beat 3 fallers.........Thorsell off of 15m...........an engine failure..........and one genuine race v Greaves.........who has beaten him every other times. If you want to make sweeping statement..........Shanes would have beaten Greaves......everyone beats Wolves reserves.........use some facts next time as you look kind of daft You are the unreal person. Im unreal lol....nice off you to wake up you seem to have gone missing on the Poole threads.....no idea why So was Shanes 'smashed' off the bike??? I wasnt there , you wasnt there..........must be the worlds worst referee Edited July 20, 2017 by Gavan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealFiend Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Everyone beats Wolves reserves lol Is that why Poole at home to Wolves were outscored 5 points to 6 points? And Shanes in the last 3 meetings v Wolves has finished in front of Wolves riders 6 times............beat 3 fallers.........Thorsell off of 15m...........an engine failure..........and one genuine race v Greaves.........who has beaten him every other times. If you want to make sweeping statement..........Shanes would have beaten Greaves......everyone beats Wolves reserves.........use some facts next time as you look kind of daft We won because we were the better team. GET OVER IT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 We won because we were the better team. GET OVER IT! No need to shout. You were the better team have i said anywhere that you werent? Need to read posts carefully. If you dont think the Howarth/Shanes injuries swung it your way then your deluded. Howarths rides yielded 2 points. Starke for Shanes got Poole 4 points. That swing helped you win the meeting surely even you can see that no? Poole can only beat what is in front of them and both at Wolves and Lynn Poole were professional and did their jobs. I stand by my opinion that Wolves would have won if the 1-7's that started the meeting finished it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealFiend Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 No need to shout. You were the better team have i said anywhere that you werent? Need to read posts carefully. If you dont think the Howarth/Shanes injuries swung it your way then your deluded. Howarths rides yielded 2 points. Starke for Shanes got Poole 4 points. That swing helped you win the meeting surely even you can see that no? Poole can only beat what is in front of them and both at Wolves and Lynn Poole were professional and did their jobs. I stand by my opinion that Wolves would have won if the 1-7's that started the meeting finished it Well why are we still going on about it then? Its happened nothing is going to change just forget about it lol. Just like last night when we got our backsides handed to us by Swindon. Its happened and that's that. Nothing is going to change the result so we have to move on to the next one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 He hurt his hand quite badly. Not a pretty sight. Nothing miraculous at all. We would still have beaten Wolves had Shanes not been speared as he had the beating of Greaves and would have only have had three rides anyway. Perhaps if he learns to stay upright and stop trying to lean on riders because he is a out of shape he wouldn't have got the exclusion that was called right. Granted it might have gone the other way (often does in incidents like that). Obviously the ref from a much better higher viewing position could see exactly how out of shape Shanes was. I clocked it anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 He wasn't out of shape. It's his actual riding style. That's how he enters corners in speedway. Granted its not usual but its the way he rides a bike. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 His riding style is out of shape then or more exposed on a thinkers track. I've seen plenty of him the past 3 seasons at Birmingham and he has always impressed me with his attacking style. However at the smaller tracks he looks more out of control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.