Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Eagles V Fen Tigers 06/05/2017


Recommended Posts

Eastbourne continue their run of Saturday night meetings at Arlington tomorrow (May 6) when they face Mildenhall in the National Trophy.


Nearly a fortnight ago, in the away match, the Suffolk side swamped the IT First Eagles and rattled up a 61-29 win.

Team manager Connor Dugard has named a full-strength team with his brother Kelsey set to resume in the No 2 berth, despite the battering he took last time out against Cradley when he fell heavily in a mid-meeting crash.

Connor Dugard said the match against Mildenhall was not about “revenge”.

He said: “We just had an off day there and we are determined to prove our critics wrong. The lads were back in the groove against Cradley and the aim is to build on that and keep moving forward.

“We are up for this and want to win the National Trophy.

“Everyone knows how important it is to win tomorrow and our two matches against Kent in the competition during the summer.”

Many eyes will be focused on both sides 15-year-old reserves: Eagles’ Tom Brennan and the Fen Tigers’ Jordan Jenkins.

Both have burst on to the speedway scene with great success in recent months with Brennan top scoring in all matches so far for the Eagles.

The meeting also sees the return to Arlington of Dan Halsey, who rode for the Eagles in Elite League days.

Eastbourne: Mark Baseby, Kelsey Dugard, Connor Coles, Mattie Bates, Georgie Wood, Charley Powell, Tom Brennan.

Mildenhall: Connor Mountain, Luke Ruddick, Jon Armstrong, Danno Verge, Dan Halsey, Sam Wood, Jordan Jenkins.

The meeting starts at Eastbourne’s Arlington Stadium, just off the A22 at Hailsham, at 7.30pm tomorrow, May 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eagles will need to get off to a strong start and take advantage of the fact that Mildenhall top 3 aren't the strongest at Eastbourne (mountain can be very good though)

Eastbourne will need a good start seeing as this group could end up going to race points to split them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, hindsight is a wonderful thing and all that, but we didn't need hindsight at trackside to ask why Tom Brennan didn't replace Charlie Powell in heats 11 and 14. Fairly sure that it would have been a more comfortable win had that been the case.

 

Have to be question marks on the future roles of both Kelsey Dugard and Charlie Powell at Eastbourne. Not the best of nights for Connor Coles either. Everyone is entitled to 'off night' every now and then though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, hindsight is a wonderful thing and all that, but we didn't need hindsight at trackside to ask why Tom Brennan didn't replace Charlie Powell in heats 11 and 14. Fairly sure that it would have been a more comfortable win had that been the case.

 

Have to be question marks on the future roles of both Kelsey Dugard and Charlie Powell at Eastbourne. Not the best of nights for Connor Coles either. Everyone is entitled to 'off night' every now and then though.

It's not just about whether the win is comfortable or not, it's gifted Mildenhall a match point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dugard started well today and was looking good in the ride against Jenkins before he crashed. 2 exclusions of Powell were a bit unfair. My only real concern is Coles averaging around 0.8 in the championship and losing out to second strings and reserves at home. The trouble with suggesting knight to come back is it means a double change to the team and I am not sure that is right just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Powell was harshly excluded but I also thought Luke Ruddick was - in fact, it was a bloody ridiculous decision.

 

I'd have put Brennan in heat 15. He'd ridden brilliantly up to that point.

 

Highlight was a stunning last bend heat 15 pass by Baseby. As good as you will see anywhere.

 

Dugard still needs to grow up. Starting on Jenkins was pathetic.

Edited by Halifaxtiger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mildenhall used Jenkins at every possible opportunity and had seven rides from him which they should do but Connor Dugard had three such opportunities to use Tom Brennan and used none of them. Brennan had Jenkins beat on the night 3-1, what a difference it would have made if they had used him in the same manner. I was amazed when Coles broke the tapes and Powell got the ride instead of Brennan.

 

The only excuse I could think of was that a re declaration was imminent with Kelsey and Charley having a last chance to see who survived and Connor wishing to give Charley a fair chance.

 

When I checked the averages though this cannot be so because Jake Knight +3.00 instead of Coles + Powell makes a total of 39.02 so near yet so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I'm saying is if they were to redeclare with knight they would have to drop Dugard or Bates.. .. and I know for sure we dont want to drop Bates. Although it looks like change is needed in the heatleader spot I still wouldn't do it yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I'm saying is if they were to redeclare with knight they would have to drop Dugard or Bates.. .. and I know for sure we dont want to drop Bates. Although it looks like change is needed in the heatleader spot I still wouldn't do it yet

If they don't do it by the 20th of the month, new averages will kick in and with Brennan in the 8's or 9's it will be impossible to make the change. A re declaration other than like for like has to be at 39 points whilst we are already on 47, due of course to Tom. It has to be now or never while tom is still 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they don't do it by the 20th of the month, new averages will kick in and with Brennan in the 8's or 9's it will be impossible to make the change. A re declaration other than like for like has to be at 39 points whilst we are already on 47, due of course to Tom. It has to be now or never while tom is still 3.

I guess so just wonder who you could get on 3 that would do a job
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose if it did leave us with Powell as our senior reserve when Tom goes up would weaken us there, but would have a cracking top 5. Also the likes of Jenkins etc will also be going up to the main body so he would by no means be the worst reserve . Who we get on a 3 though is the big question. Also I wonder if there's anyway a deal can be done to get Kelsey back to the IOW if he was to go.

Back to the match, it almost seemed as though we were trying to gift Mildenhall the point. Did see the remaining fixtures in the NT mean Mildenhall play Kent home and away before we play Kent. If Mildenhall win home and away which seems a possibility they're through whatever, could see the Kent /Eastie ties not happening then.

Edited by gazzac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plenty of programmes this week !

 

Rattled along nicely to start with, the first 5 heats completed by 8pm (including 2 tapes breakages). Then looked at my watch at the conclusion of heat 10, it was 9pm !

 

Have to agree that Kelsey needs to 'grow up', I get the impression he's a bit of a prima dona and should worry less about his image and concentrate more on riding the bike - keep under the radar mate and let results do the talking would be my advice. Although I accept he must be under pressure (either real or self imposed) being a Dugard at Eastbourne, perhaps it would be better for his development at another track.

 

Not sure that Powell was harshly excluded, although they were first and second bend incidents, it was pretty clear that he wasn't in control of his machine and was the primary cause of the stoppage (remember there is no 'first bend bunching' rule).

 

Poor tactical decisions cost us a point last night, Brennan should have had more rides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy