orion Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Not wrong mate, he has no choice. Either he rides for somebody else or not at all. Christ you and that numpty Steve0 make a good win double. Chuck in Orion had you've hit the jackpot.. :rofl: Still , you will argue untill you are blue in the face, even if you are wrong. Thats why you've gone on ignore.. Of course you are Wrong .. you said he would not ride for anyone in the uk bar poole ..that is now clearly not the case ...then you made another ironic starman statement going on about arguing to your blue in the face even when your wrong ...what of course you are now doing yourself 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Of course you are Wrong .. you said he would not ride for anyone in the uk bar poole ..that is now clearly not the case ...then you made another ironic starman statement going on about arguing to your blue in the face even when your wrong ...what of course you are now doing yourself As i said, he either rides for somebody else or nobody. Its his choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Stop winding Starman up!! If you don't see eye to eye with your boss you probably want to move. I'm glad we don't pander to riders anymore like Coventry do with Garrity 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 I think its fair to say that if the averages hadn't been 'factored' (I think thats the right word?!), Chris would have been included in Poole's 1-7 as usual and not looked anywhere else. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurntFaceMan Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 This is boring now. Chris Holder rides for King's Lynn. Who gives a ship about why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orion Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 (edited) As i said, he either rides for somebody else or nobody. Its his choice. You said he would not ride for anyone bar Poole ...and now he has so you were wrong .end of Edited December 18, 2016 by orion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy robin Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 I think its fair to say that if the averages hadn't been 'factored' (I think thats the right word?!), Chris would have been included in Poole's 1-7 as usual and not looked anywhere else. We all said that before Darcy's accident when it was said Matt would choose Darcy over Chris & Chris would have to move on. Starman always said Chris wouldn't ride for anyone else & would give Britain a miss as a result if Poole didn't want him. Still at least I'm on ignore now😀😀 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agrotron Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 I think its fair to say that if the averages hadn't been 'factored' (I think thats the right word?!), Chris would have been included in Poole's 1-7 as usual and not looked anywhere else. I don't agree 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 I don't agree Why dont you agree please elaborate ?., it was all down to figures, simple as that ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurntFaceMan Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 (edited) I don't agree If it were all down to figures, Cecil would put his mother's murderer in the team if it meant he'd have the upper hand. Edited December 18, 2016 by BurntFaceMan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 If it were all down to figures, Cecil would put his mother's murderer in the team if it meant he'd have the upper hand. Jesus, what is that meant to mean? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurntFaceMan Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Jesus, what is that meant to mean? It's meant to mean that Matt couldn't care less whether the relationship were soured or not. If it made business sense to include Chris in the team then he'd be there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve0 Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Not wrong mate, he has no choice. Either he rides for somebody else or not at all. Christ you and that numpty Steve0 make a good win double. Chuck in Orion had you've hit the jackpot.. :rofl: Still , you will argue untill you are blue in the face, even if you are wrong. Thats why you've gone on ignore.. You know you have lost the argument when you have to resort to name calling - an all too familiar trait for you 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 (edited) You know you have lost the argument when you have to resort to name calling - an all too familiar trait for you Funny how you try and hunt out a post, isn't it.. Edited December 18, 2016 by Starman2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve0 Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Funny how you try and hunt out a post, isn't it.. What are you on about now? Hunt out a post? You posted it a couple of hours ago and this is the first I've seen it. My point still stands! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 What are you on about now? Hunt out a post? You posted it a couple of hours ago and this is the first I've seen it. My point still stands! Yeh course it is.., Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agrotron Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 What are you on about now? Hunt out a post? You posted it a couple of hours ago and this is the first I've seen it. My point still stands! Ahahaha!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 I think its fair to say that if the averages hadn't been 'factored' (I think thats the right word?!), Chris would have been included in Poole's 1-7 as usual and not looked anywhere else.even if the team building limit was 36? Factored or otherwise thats effectively what it is. Its the same proportion of the total either way.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve0 Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Yeh course it is.., Your parents must be very proud of you - you are a gift that just keeps giving! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 (edited) Your parents must be very proud of you - you are a gift that just keeps giving! Next time you come to Poole and sit at the front of the Grandstand looking like a miserable stuffed potato do say hello. Edited December 18, 2016 by Starman2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.