Trees Posted November 22, 2016 Report Share Posted November 22, 2016 Like the Wolves management said in the Star, Wolves had to suffer when Tai was crap for them so really they should've been the only ones to benefit .... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEVEHOLS54 Posted November 22, 2016 Report Share Posted November 22, 2016 Like the Wolves management said in the Star, Wolves had to suffer when Tai was crap for them so really they should've been the only ones to benefit .... We could all argue the rights and wrongs of riders who have come in all night but still on a C.Holder forum ??? Important thing is the future. The new rules on no riders signing after 31/7 will stop any of these dealings. Also with the new Polish EL rules re max 3 leagues incl your own national league will make sure that any of these top riders riding in Poland will for sure not drop Poland just to finish second half of the new watered down English Prem. We can but hope that is ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g13webb Posted November 22, 2016 Report Share Posted November 22, 2016 (edited) When this 3 yr period was introduced, the sport was run on a uniform pattern. But when the race format is changing on a yearly basis, any CMA that is not current is out of date. What a pity the BSPA couldn't keep up with the rules when they were changing everything regularly . Edited November 22, 2016 by GRW123 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted November 22, 2016 Report Share Posted November 22, 2016 When this 3 yr period was introduced, the sport was run on a uniform pattern. But when the race format is changing on a yearly basis, any CMA that is not current is out of date. What a pity the BSPA couldn't keep up with the rules when they were changing everything regularly . The race format was the same in 2014 as it was in 2016, and 2015 for that matter. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Smith Posted November 22, 2016 Report Share Posted November 22, 2016 The race format was the same in 2014 as it was in 2016, and 2015 for that matter. It wasn't though was it. 2016 was the only season EDR's could move into the top 5 All irrelevant though as Woffy's average was the only average he could have been given, don't understand why it's still being discussed though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted November 22, 2016 Report Share Posted November 22, 2016 It wasn't though was it. 2016 was the only season EDR's could move into the top 5 All irrelevant though as Woffy's average was the only average he could have been given, don't understand why it's still being discussed though. Race format was the same tho which was my only point. But yea I agree, fail to see why some still are banging on about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakley Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) VERY unlikely that Zagar will be back at Belle Vue. It was never on the cards for 2017 anyway and Holder has at least said he loves riding at the NSS. Yeah right, you "know" everything about Zagar...just like you said he wont get a wild card... You started being too much obvious Mr. Rising #antiZagar Btw...Zagar was very welcomed in 2017 after the season Edited November 23, 2016 by oakley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 Belle Vue should do everything possible to get Holder. Best rider along with Lindgren around the NSS. Would form a great spearhead with Steve Worrall , Cook and Fricke and Jacobs at reserve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nellie Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 Belle Vue should do everything possible to get Holder. Best rider along with Lindgren around the NSS. Would form a great spearhead with Steve Worrall , Cook and Fricke and Jacobs at reserveLeaves 3.90 for two reserves so won't work, nevermind Jacobs being at reserve. If BV get Holder it would be at the expense Worrall,Cook or Fricke. Doesn't sound likely, unless Fricke goes to Coventry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foamfence Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 Belle Vue should do everything possible to get Holder. Best rider along with Lindgren around the NSS. Would form a great spearhead with Steve Worrall , Cook and Fricke and Jacobs at reserve Will they be in a position to spend that sort of money? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haza Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 Will they be in a position to spend that sort of money? well they wasn't in 2016 but that didn't stop them and look were that ended up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foamfence Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 well they wasn't in 2016 but that didn't stop them and look were that ended up Exactly my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.V 72 Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) well they wasn't in 2016 but that didn't stop them and look were that ended up New promoters perhaps new/more sponsors,New deal with the council and a clean slate,(i would think that any new promoter would not take the club on if any of the present dept was to be passed on)No back dated depts through running at a loss at the dog hole.Going off last years ave crowds prob one of the better supported clubs.So who knows who is or whos not affordable we will all just have to wait and see. Edited November 23, 2016 by B.V 72 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagpuss Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 It will be a brand new promotion, why are people comparing what they might do with what the outgoing lot actually did? Will be two completely separate entities. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Smith Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 It will be a brand new promotion, why are people comparing what they might do with what the outgoing lot actually did? Will be two completely separate entities. Whilst that's true, nobody knows whether the new promotion will start from scratch or take on the existing debt. If the latter then whoever it is is in a precarious position straight from the off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waiheke1 Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 Whilst that's true, nobody knows whether the new promotion will start from scratch or take on the existing debt. If the latter then whoever it is is in a precarious position straight from the off Why would they take on existing debt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyderd Posted November 24, 2016 Report Share Posted November 24, 2016 Why are we still discussing about B Vue on C Holders thread ????? Can/could the admin transfer the B Vue comments onto the B Vue thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LagutaRacingFan Posted November 24, 2016 Report Share Posted November 24, 2016 A dark day for British Speedway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted November 24, 2016 Report Share Posted November 24, 2016 Its quite sunny down south!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABS Posted November 24, 2016 Report Share Posted November 24, 2016 Why would they take on existing debt? Well B V Arena Ltd. is still an active company. It had three directors, of which two (Gordon & Morton) have resigned, leaving Carswell as the only director at the moment. So theoretically B V Arena could still run as the contracting party with M/Cr Council, with a change to the directorship, but who knows really what is going on behind the scenes, other than those party to the discussions? And then there is BVA Holdings, incorporated 23/10/15. which all three are still directors of. Who knows what their intentions were when they formed this company? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.