Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Darcy Ward Says No Holder At Poole No Me At Poole


Recommended Posts

I've criticised Darcy in the past, but can't see anything wrong with this tweet.

He and holder have been the two stars you associate with poole for this decade, so it is an end of an era. And this year's top flight will be arguably the weakest ever. That's what he's pointing out here, and it's hard to deny that it's true.

Spot on. That's exactly the point he was making.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darcy is entitled to his opinion, can't say it means anything at all to the top flight.

Bit foot in mouth if he suggesting not supporting the top flight if he wants to run a meeting at a club he has a long association with.

However it's not the first time and won't be the last he makes such a flammable post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must rate as one of the most critical of speedway fans re: Darcy Ward, however when reading that post I took it to mean that Poole are now without Chris and himself riding for the team, nothing more nothing less.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must rate as one of the most critical of speedway fans re: Darcy Ward, however when reading that post I took it to mean that Poole are now without Chris and himself riding for the team, nothing more nothing less.

 

So what's the significance of the 'what even is speedway in UK. Anymore' bit. Seems to me he's decrying the sport over here in total, not just Poole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people reading far too much into the DW tweet. Team speedway is slowly dying on its arse. Too expensive to run, not enough people paying through the gate. It can only go one way

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twitter is a strange thing!

 

First time I saw this I was convinced he was having a go at Poole - saying that he would not be at Poole because they had droped Chris Holder.

 

Then later, I realised it probably meant that times have changed and that neither of them are at Poole any longer.

 

But it could be read either way.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twitter is a strange thing!

 

First time I saw this I was convinced he was having a go at Poole - saying that he would not be at Poole because they had droped Chris Holder.

 

Then later, I realised it probably meant that times have changed and that neither of them are at Poole any longer.

Unfortunately anti Poole only read's one shame really

Edited by ray c
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twitter is a strange thing!

 

First time I saw this I was convinced he was having a go at Poole - saying that he would not be at Poole because they had droped Chris Holder.

 

Then later, I realised it probably meant that times have changed and that neither of them are at Poole any longer.

 

But it could be read either way.

sadly it's the lack of punctuation and the word 'and' which means it's 50-50 I expect, but as I already have said I'm definitely not a Darcy fan but I didn't read it negatively,just that neither he nor Chris would be lining up at WR
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy