Paulco Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 So, Rene isn't back next season. I'd have had him down as a certain returnee up until the reduction in team building points was announced. I would assume the rest of the team is pretty much decided now then. I would think so . Aaron , Richie , Son of God , Nike , Jack Smith , hopefully Bewley and whoever else fits 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damosuzuki Posted November 6, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 Final averages should be out this week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoff 100 Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 the 3 ht leaders av come to just short of 25 pts one of them has to go,who would u lose the most expensive or least popular ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 (edited) the 3 ht leaders av come to just short of 25 pts one of them has to go,who would u lose the most expensive or least popular ?? Don't think any of them are unpopular And if Andy Smith's son comes in on a 2 , then him Bewley and Lunna would be less than 11 , giving us room for Garcia maybe Edited November 6, 2016 by Paulco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MANSE Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 You would be left with about 3.82.After the Edinburgh meeting is added the 3 heat leaders is about 25.3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 You would be left with about 3.82.After the Edinburgh meeting is added the 3 heat leaders is about 25.3 I was only going by the averages someone had posted on another thread . Pumping the Monarchs last month could turn out to be a bit of a pain in the ass for our team building plans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScotsman Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 That was why we laid down that night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 That was why we laid down that night. Thought your lot didn't do stuff like that 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MANSE Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 Yes about + 0.65 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScotsman Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 Thought your lot didn't do stuff like that Just following your lead! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 Just following your lead! Suppose you have to try and emulate your peers where you can 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScotsman Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 Only if it screws up the little team! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MANSE Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 (edited) Just framed post 147 to use whenever required. Wait till Mr Blobby sees that Edited November 6, 2016 by MANSE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solidmango Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 I would think so . Aaron , Richie , Son of God , Nike , Jack Smith , hopefully Bewley and whoever else fits Sounds good to me. I like the lineup with any of those top 3 lining up with Nike or Bewley at 2 and 4. It would only leave us 3.5ish for another reserve tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 dont forget smith is a 3.00 rider . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solidmango Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 dont forget smith is a 3.00 rider . There seems to be some confusion on the new number 7. The last I read said, if it's a new rider e.g. smith then he'll come in on a 2 point average. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damosuzuki Posted November 6, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 3 Heat leaders should be more than achievable in 40. We had Lawson, Worrall, Barking and Summers last year. Something like Lawson Worral lunna bewley Summers ???? smith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac101 Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 There seems to be some confusion on the new number 7. The last I read said, if it's a new rider e.g. smith then he'll come in on a 2 point average. the 2 pointers are riders that rode pl this year and not put anything on there average new riders will come in on a 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharpenRake Posted November 7, 2016 Report Share Posted November 7, 2016 There seems to be some confusion on the new number 7. The last I read said, if it's a new rider e.g. smith then he'll come in on a 2 point average. the 2 pointers are riders that rode pl this year and not put anything on there average new riders will come in on a 3 As Solidmango says there is confusion over the no.7 spot. I can't see how a NL rider that's benefitted from riding all year in the PL because he was presumably better than other riders who only rode NL can then benefit from a lower average than those who have never ridden in the PL. So I can't help but think other posters are right when they say if a NL rider hasn't got a PL average then he comes in on a 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solidmango Posted November 7, 2016 Report Share Posted November 7, 2016 As Solidmango says there is confusion over the no.7 spot. I can't see how a NL rider that's benefitted from riding all year in the PL because he was presumably better than other riders who only rode NL can then benefit from a lower average than those who have never ridden in the PL. So I can't help but think other posters are right when they say if a NL rider hasn't got a PL average then he comes in on a 2 Agreed and as unusual as some of the rules are, surely this one hasn't been created for just the 8 riders that didn't attain a 3 this year? In addition, if you 'have' to have a 3 at number 7 that means the 2 pointer would be at number 6, who in their right mind would set up with that sort of partnership at reserve? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.