Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Speedway Agm


TB1

Recommended Posts

IMO the basics are scrapping doubling up / down and reintroducing real team speedway , not this mercenary driven free for all we currently have and admission costs reduced , until these are addressed I don't think we will ever begin to recover , we have to dangle a temptation carrot to the wider public, I keep seeing riders tweets about what's in this agm for them ? What about the fans ?

 

Very true without the fans theres nothing at all in it for the riders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are definitely not enough riders of a good enough standard that want to ride in Britain to fill every team.

Then they need to cut down the number of riders per team....

 

One of the problems in the Sport is the huge ability gap between numbers one and seven so run with less riders but of a more equal ability level...

 

Maybe make five man teams from last years EL septets eg take Zagar and Jacobs out of BV's team from last year and you have no 'superstars' nor 'NL heat leaders' and must surely be cheaper to run...?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is right - another bloody daft decision.

 

Pathetic really.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

As Victor Meldrew once said I do not believe it. They didn't really announce green helmet colours instead of yellow. Some saw the sarcasm of that being the promoters big Day 1 decision and some didn't.

 

But Jason Doyle did tweet he is doubling up next season as he wants more time on the bike. Which team will he add to Swindon ?

 

 

Edited by marky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then they need to cut down the number of riders per team....

 

One of the problems in the Sport is the huge ability gap between numbers one and seven so run with less riders but of a more equal ability level...

 

Maybe make five man teams from last years EL septets eg take Zagar and Jacobs out of BV's team from last year and you have no 'superstars' nor 'NL heat leaders' and must surely be cheaper to run...?

 

Not do maths at school?

 

Currently you have fifteen heats with fourteen riders. This means you pay for 90 points.

 

You want 6-man teams? That's 12 riders. But you'll still want 15 heats, yes? So you're still paying for 90 points.

 

Your saving is..........?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not do maths at school?

 

Currently you have fifteen heats with fourteen riders. This means you pay for 90 points.

 

You want 6-man teams? That's 12 riders. But you'll still want 15 heats, yes? So you're still paying for 90 points.

 

Your saving is..........?

The suggestion was 13 heats. You save on travel and all the other bits that riders insist on having before they sign up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not do maths at school?

 

Currently you have fifteen heats with fourteen riders. This means you pay for 90 points.

 

You want 6-man teams? That's 12 riders. But you'll still want 15 heats, yes? So you're still paying for 90 points.

 

Your saving is..........?

The amount you pay the riders isn't often down to points scored...

 

Points money is often completely irrelevant given the differing deals riders do..

 

Zagar was said to be on £3k regardless of points scored...

 

Top riders can get £2k basic before scoring any points therefore having No GP rider must reduce the cost base..

 

PS. Taking TWO riders out of SEVEN in the example I gave means FIVE riders per team therefore TEN in total not TWELVE like you calculated..

 

Did YOU not do maths at school..?😁

 

PPS. I didn't mention anything about how many heats a meeting should have..(?)

 

Did YOU not do English either...?😁

Edited by mikebv
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at all the posts on here it's fair to say loads of people want something different depending on who they support and their own personal circumstances. Fair to say whatever comes out of the AGM they won't please everyone so damned if they do, damned if they don't.

 

Who'd be a promoter.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at all the posts on here it's fair to say loads of people want something different depending on who they support and their own personal circumstances. Fair to say whatever comes out of the AGM they won't please everyone so damned if they do, damned if they don't.

 

Who'd be a promoter.

The problem is that they seem to spend a lot of time and effort not pleasing - anyone.....................

 

They don't seem too bothered that they, in some ways, are driving folk away from the Sport - not attracting them as they ought to be.

Edited by The White Knight
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that they seem to spend a lot of time and effort not pleasing - anyone.....................

 

They don't seem too bothered that they, in some ways, are driving folk away from the Sport - not attracting them as they ought to be.

Whilst I don't have the confidence that anything will change, The lakeside withdrawal from the EL will surely provide change in the top division. Presumably nothing else changes then, as I thought all teams had to declare intention to run before the agm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that they seem to spend a lot of time and effort not pleasing - anyone.....................

 

They don't seem too bothered that they, in some ways, are driving folk away from the Sport - not attracting them as they ought to be.

 

I find the words in the above post a fallacy, a misconception and a massively incorrect positioning of actual circumstances and quite unfair on promotions.

 

It (speedway) is their (the promoters) business! It’s the thing they invest far more time and money into than the vast majority of fans (not something fans like to hear, but a truth none the less) so why would they (promoters) invest time and effort to consciously “not please anyone” and damage their own business? What you are attempting to say doesn’t make one ounce of sense – it isn’t considered, weighted or logical - it just sounds like the thing people think they should be saying on this forum now, mainly because it has turned into an echo chamber of the same voices saying the same false truths.

 

Some fans have imagined the idea (wrongly) that promoters have attempted to drive a wedge between the sport and fans – the situation that is closer to the truth is that individuals tend to impose their own views on situations and then pass that scenario of as a truth, reality, actual event – even though said situation hasn’t actually occurred…but say thing often enough you might start to make people believe it.

 

While it is a feeling and no one should be told to change how they feel, there are fans on here who should stop trying to pass their feelings of so strongly, so much so that they have created a promotional boogeyman that doesn’t even exist, and thus people on here are fighting the case for and against situations that never actually occur (eg your post)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The suggestion was 13 heats. You save on travel and all the other bits that riders insist on having before they sign up.

Really, so how do you do that ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy