LifeIsSpeedway Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 If you could build your own team for your club from 1-7 who would you like to see at your club... using the most recent average release and going by this years rules leave it below along with your clubs name, i.e Edinburgh Monarchs, Redcar Bears, Somerset Rebels etc.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch958 Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 surely there are individual threads for each club to cover this? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LifeIsSpeedway Posted October 18, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 More than likely, but it's just a bit of fun! Also saves me trekking through them all, you don't need to post one if you don't wish to but feel free to leave yours here too! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillipsr Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 Im now classing Newcastle as my team as just moved from 2miles away from Rye House so im going to do a team for both :-)  Newcastle  1. Steve Worrall 8.51 2. Adam Roynon 5.05 3. Jack Holder 7.16 4. Lewis Rose 5.86 5. Kenneth Bjerre 8.22 6. Rob Branford 4.60 7. Jack Smith 3.00  = 42.4  Rye House  1 Eddie Kennet 9.27 2. Adam Roynon 5.05 3. Kenneth Hansen 6.14 ​4. Nikolaj Busk Jakobsen 6.98 5. Jack Holder 7.16 6. Rob Branford 4.60 7. Jack Smith 3.00  =42.2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewy Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 Plymouth anyone will do as long as we are running and still in the pl 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnstormer Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 Im now classing Newcastle as my team as just moved from 2miles away from Rye House so im going to do a team for both :-)  Newcastle  1. Steve Worrall 8.51 2. Adam Roynon 5.05 3. Jack Holder 7.16 4. Lewis Rose 5.86 5. Kenneth Bjerre 8.22 6. Rob Branford 4.60 7. Jack Smith 3.00  = 42.4  Rye House  1 Eddie Kennet 9.27 2. Adam Roynon 5.05 3. Kenneth Hansen 6.14 ​4. Nikolaj Busk Jakobsen 6.98 5. Jack Holder 7.16 6. Rob Branford 4.60 7. Jack Smith 3.00  =42.2 To be fair I think you'd be better forgetting 42.5. I just got feeling the league to save costs will water down ? Maybe 38. 39 or 40 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMungo Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 To be fair I think you'd be better forgetting 42.5. I just got feeling the league to save costs will water down ? Maybe 38. 39 or 40 ? Â I heard a whisper it could go as low down as 36 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016  I heard a whisper it could go as low down as 36 probably a good starting point if you are calling for a reduction whilst others dont want them. Meet somewhere in the middle and ends up 39/40..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) Few riders probably out of jobs next year then? It will be key to finding improvers. Wasting over 7 points on average riders isn't the way to go. Edited October 18, 2016 by baldyman 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaramanga Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 prem league was a very good product when points limit was 45 the only difference to the cost is the fees teams agree with there riders if the points limit is 36 good riders on 5point averages will demand more money than if the points limit was 45 riders on high averages will have to ride for less as there will be plenty wont get a team place so the higher riders will be compeating for team places 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) Making both reserves have a combined ave of 7 would easily reduce the team total. have this years no7's move upto to the no6 position and then have a new no 7. Riders like Ashley Morris, Lewis Rose, Rob Branford (under 5's ) need to step up and be as the 2nd 2nd string (eg at no 2) The next in line eg 5-6 point riders (Jacobs, Roynon, Bates) as number 4's Will riders like Mason Campton who finished year on a 4.40 average have their 2017 starting ave increased to 5? Â Using Ipswich as an example, even this team has a total of 40.74! Â 1. Barker 7.91 2. Heeps 5.07 3. Covatti 7.49 4. Sarjeant 5.80 5. Risager 7.13 6. Lanham 4.34 7. Hume 3.00 Â a limit of 38 would see: Â 1. Barker 7.91 2. Heeps 5.07 3. Sarjeant 5.80 4. Manzares 5.00 5. Covatti 7.49 6. Mountain 3.00 7. Hume 3.00 Edited October 18, 2016 by 2ndbendbeerhut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMungo Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 prem league was a very good product when points limit was 45 the only difference to the cost is the fees teams agree with there riders if the points limit is 36 good riders on 5point averages will demand more money than if the points limit was 45 riders on high averages will have to ride for less as there will be plenty wont get a team place so the higher riders will be compeating for team places 45.00 was back when BPs counted towards averages. Even though 45.00 (with BPs) is higher than 40.00 (without BPs) the difference is not as vast as it sounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazc Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 Â I heard a whisper it could go as low down as 36 Will ruin the league if they go as low as that as others have said riders on high averages will be out a job for being good at there job. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panthers89 Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 Dream team: Â Holder 7.16 Newman 6.31 Jonas B 6.32 Hansen 6.25 Lasse 6.75 Shanes 3.00 Morris 4.37 Â 40.04 Â With British average reductions would fall under 40.00, team full of progression and be superb around the EOES 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diamond_ren Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 Will ruin the league if they go as low as that as others have said riders on high averages will be out a job for being good at there job. How will lowering the points limit save money? If that's what's rumored to be happening.... Surely clubs should only be paying what they can afford. If the riders don't want to accept that then so be it 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Johnson Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 Ben Barker. 7.91 Carl Wilko 6.12 Josh Auty 7.01 Lewi Kerr 6.16 Ryan Douglas 7.18 Fritz Wallner 5.00 Jack Smith.....3.00 42.38? Limit to stay the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) prem league was a very good product when points limit was 45 the only difference to the cost is the fees teams agree with there riders if the points limit is 36 good riders on 5point averages will demand more money than if the points limit was 45 riders on high averages will have to ride for less as there will be plenty wont get a team place so the higher riders will be compeating for team places I agree,lower the points limits means nothing regarding paying out points money.Typical blinkered approach.45 pt limit and agree a wage structure would be a better idea,but as usual self interest will win the day.What happens after next season lower the limit again to get rid of the top earners,Joke!!Ps Would like,Birmingham,Cradley and Eastbourne to publish what they are paying points money wise but will never happen. Edited October 18, 2016 by Fromafar 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruno Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 Wasn't it Nicki Pedersen who said when you get rid of the top riders the next in line get the top money so you then get a watered down product 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 Dream team: Â Holder 7.16 Newman 6.31 Jonas B 6.32 Hansen 6.25 Lasse 6.75 Shanes 3.00 Morris 4.37 Â 40.04 Â With British average reductions would fall under 40.00, team full of progression and be superb around the EOES If it's a 40 limit, that's a winning team right there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drew2 Posted October 18, 2016 Report Share Posted October 18, 2016 If it's a 40 limit, that's a winning team right there. it isn't as it is 0.04 too high!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.