A ORLOV Posted October 14, 2016 Report Share Posted October 14, 2016 The thing is Orion the result was a massive shock nobody really expected it i didnt a real shock result .The Establishment were defeated Cameron really underestimated the feeling of the british people and he got it horribly wrong is it right is it Wrong.?.For me if we had got some powers back (Cameron Failed) i would of been happy to stay put.But this decision now is the right thing to do i believe in our country and think we will make a very good fist of it. And whats more the price of noodles have gone up as well !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orion Posted October 14, 2016 Report Share Posted October 14, 2016 And whats more the price of noodles have gone up as well !!! The Noodle king has gone Orlov ..the first victim of the out vote . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humphrey Appleby Posted October 14, 2016 Report Share Posted October 14, 2016 Why many of them voted to get out was because of all the red tape and paperwork they have to comply with. They know they'll just get subsidies from the UK government instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A ORLOV Posted October 14, 2016 Report Share Posted October 14, 2016 (edited) They know they'll just get subsidies from the UK government instead. No problem with that as they need to be encouraged to grow more food. We need to produce more and start reducing our level of imports, it will be a small reduction but any reduction will be good. Edited October 14, 2016 by A ORLOV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted October 14, 2016 Report Share Posted October 14, 2016 Certainly a few loonies came out of the woodwork with their racist abuse but I don't ascribe to it being 'massive' - what is equally frightening to me is the attempt to overturn the will of the majority! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humphrey Appleby Posted October 14, 2016 Report Share Posted October 14, 2016 what is equally frightening to me is the attempt to overturn the will of the majority! It's not the will of the majority, as only 37% of the electorate voted to leave the EU. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daytripper Posted October 14, 2016 Report Share Posted October 14, 2016 Back to the point of the tread. Kim Nilsson is coming over for the Lakeside Dinner and Dance which suggests to me he is very likely lining up as a Hammer next year. I would be very surprised if Jake Thorssell is not back at Wolves, from what I hear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve0 Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 It's not the will of the majority, as only 37% of the electorate voted to leave the EU. Then those who didn't use their vote should have got down to the polling stations and cast their vote. Sadly (for me and others), the majority who could be bothered to vote voted to exit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g13webb Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 It's not the will of the majority, as only 37% of the electorate voted to leave the EU. It was the will of the people. Those that didn't bother to vote can't be considered. They had the chance like all of us but gave up their opinion when they couldn't be bothered. Although saying that, the turnout was far bigger than the General Election .... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 (edited) It's not the will of the majority, as only 37% of the electorate voted to leave the EU. Nonsense and you know that. You can't count couch potatoes who could not careless how the vote went as remainers. Edited October 15, 2016 by Deano Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodenspoon Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 It's not the will of the majority, as only 37% of the electorate voted to leave the EU. Even less of a percentage voted to stay in the EU. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 It's not the will of the majority, as only 37% of the electorate voted to leave the EU. I would be embarrassed to make that comment. As you well know, a majority relates to those voting and anyone who cared about the outcome should have expressed their views via the ballot box. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A ORLOV Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 I would be embarrassed to make that comment. As you well know, a majority relates to those voting and anyone who cared about the outcome should have expressed their views via the ballot box. Some cannot accept that if people do not vote they cannot be included in the result. Maybe more might have voted to stay if cameron had come back from the eu with a decent agreement instead of the cr#p they gave him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 Some cannot accept that if people do not vote they cannot be included in the result. Maybe more might have voted to stay if cameron had come back from the eu with a decent agreement instead of the cr#p they gave him. Cameron's mantra was that Britain was better off in a reformed EU - what the latter showed him was that it was incapable of reform (even on a small scale). Any organisation that believes a single currency will actually work across 18 diverse economies just about sums up their intellectual grasp on reality! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humphrey Appleby Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 Any organisation that believes a single currency will actually work across 18 diverse economies just about sums up their intellectual grasp on reality! Which is why the euro is the second most traded currency in the world, is the second most widely held reserve currency, and has increased 20% in value against the pound in the past year. Yes, it clearly doesn't work... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 (edited) Which is why the euro is the second most traded currency in the world, is the second most widely held reserve currency, and has increased 20% in value against the pound in the past year. Yes, it clearly doesn't work... The Celtic tiger ring a bell. Yes I agree I works wonderfully.... however much it is traded. Ask a Greek restaurant owner how happy his family are with the Euro. Unless they have been forced to emigrate of course. Edited October 15, 2016 by Deano Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humphrey Appleby Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 The Celtic tiger ring a bell. Yes I agree I works wonderfully.... however much it is traded. Ask a Greek restaurant owner how happy his family are with the Euro. The Greeks shouldn't have continually elected governments that spent more than what they took in taxes, and it would also help if the population was more willing to actually pay those taxes. They brought it upon themselves, and would be in trouble even if they were still using the drachma. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iris123 Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 (edited) The Greeks shouldn't have continually elected governments that spent more than what they took in taxes, and it would also help if the population was more willing to actually pay those taxes. They brought it upon themselves, and would be in trouble even if they were still using the drachma. Watched two BBC programmes today.One on the absolute shambles the Greeks have made of the country over the past few decades and how those who bailed them out have tried to bring them to their senses.In typical style it is the EU and Germany who the people direct their anger at instead of those closer to home who are really to blame.Is this because of biased media as is often the case in the UK? The other was on the millions of money the Greens made out of tax avoidance etc from BHS Greeks + Greens + corruption Edited October 15, 2016 by iris123 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 (edited) The Greeks shouldn't have continually elected governments that spent more than what they took in taxes, and it would also help if the population was more willing to actually pay those taxes. They brought it upon themselves, and would be in trouble even if they were still using the drachma. What about those that didn't vote for that elected government? The ones that didn't vote to spend more money than they had... as per your referendum argument. or are you now claiming both the Eu referendum and the Greeks voting in spenders is democratically correct? Edited October 15, 2016 by Deano Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A ORLOV Posted October 15, 2016 Report Share Posted October 15, 2016 Watched two BBC programmes today.One on the absolute shambles the Greeks have made of the country over the past few decades and how those who bailed them out have tried to bring them to their senses.In typical style it is the EU and Germany who the people direct their anger at instead of those closer to home who are really to blame.Is this because of biased media as is often the case in the UK? The other was on the millions of money the Greens made out of tax avoidance etc from BHS Greeks + Greens + corruption There is plenty wrong with the eu and was before the greek crisis came to a head. Yes the greek govt were basket cases and allowed anyone who was in a position to not pay their taxes to do so, and what happened when they announced they were going to clamp down, millions were taken out of greece and invested abroad. When the eu expanded greece should not have been allowed to join it, it fiddled its figures and was given a too high convergence rate, but the egos of those in charge of the eu at the time wanted to appear powerful and would not admit they were wrong in inviting greece to join. Even after this was known the eu still offered them loans that they knew they would either struggle to or never pay back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.