foreverblue Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Sounds like he wanted riders that are riding elsewhere which is the riders choice. No idea why he would want Manzares! I think this Wolves team is at least good enough to make the play offs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Sounds like he wanted riders that are riding elsewhere which is the riders choice. No idea why he would want Manzares! I think this Wolves team is at least good enough to make the play offs. I think you are being generous to what looks like a mediocre lineup. They may make top four but I wouldn't bet my house on it. Three better teams already named. And Coventry look just as good if they run. Of course my opinion is based on the lineups at the start, and not at the end of July with Woffinden coming in in place of Masters. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 I think you are being generous to what looks like a mediocre lineup. They may make top four but I wouldn't bet my house on it. Three better teams already named. And Coventry look just as good if they run. Of course my opinion is based on the lineups at the start, and not at the end of July with Woffinden coming in in place of Masters. Its a line up certain to hit the top 4. Strong heat leader trio (stronger then Pooles) solid second strings with a slight weakness at reserve. Those sour grapes must still be hurting. Be nice if Tai came in but i can see it being for Clegg with Skornicki dropping to reserve. Rumour has it that Vaculik or Dudek are lined up for Poole to replace Kurtz further into the season....depends on who Poole can feign an injury and doctors note for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Sounds like he wanted riders that are riding elsewhere which is the riders choice. No idea why he would want Manzares! I think this Wolves team is at least good enough to make the play offs. Think most are likely to have Wolves in their top 4 starting line up, and it's easy to see why. I think you are being generous to what looks like a mediocre lineup. They may make top four but I wouldn't bet my house on it. Three better teams already named. And Coventry look just as good if they run. Of course my opinion is based on the lineups at the start, and not at the end of July with Woffinden coming in in place of Masters. So you keep on saying. We all know you like to put down most seasons wolves team. You said the same thing this season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outofdarkness Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 I think you are being generous to what looks like a mediocre lineup. They may make top four but I wouldn't bet my house on it. Three better teams already named. And Coventry look just as good if they run. Of course my opinion is based on the lineups at the start, and not at the end of July with Woffinden coming in in place of Masters. In a weaker league than last year and Wolves retaining 5 of the title winning team how can you or anyone knock or slate this Wolves team.I said previously that this year could and should be alot closer .I believe that our team has a very good chance but i can't see anyone running away with it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 In a weaker league than last year and Wolves retaining 5 of the title winning team how can you or anyone knock or slate this Wolves team.I said previously that this year could and should be alot closer .I believe that our team has a very good chance but i can't see anyone running away with it. No they won't. Not even us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfsbane Posted December 23, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Steve is from the Arsene Wenger school. When you win emphasise how good you are but when you lose try to deflect by attacking others. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Steve is from the Arsene Wenger school. When you win emphasise how good you are but when you lose try to deflect by attacking others. Im quite happy with our side, but i don't think we will run away with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfsbane Posted December 23, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year everyone. COYW. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Steve is from the Arsene Wenger school. When you win emphasise how good you are but when you lose try to deflect by attacking others. Nowt wrong with Arsene. Best manager in the league. No team stands head and shoulders but threet teams do stand out from the others. Kings Lynn, Rye House and Poole. Coventry and Wolves look similar. I can't judge BV or Leicester yet. I believe you have a solid top three, weak second strings and weaker reserves. The team started to shape up well and then fell apart. In inclusion of Skornicki could have been viewed as some type of masterstroke, but I believe its a wrong and silly decision. I like Adam and he has been a good servant to the EL but time moves on and with a season out will struggle. Just my opinion of course. The reserves are weak. Clegg will be OK at home but both will struggle away from Monmore. So that's my opinion. Not trying to be confrontational to Wolves fans but I look at other teams and see better lineups. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outofdarkness Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Nowt wrong with Arsene. Best manager in the league. No team stands head and shoulders but threet teams do stand out from the others. Kings Lynn, Rye House and Poole. Coventry and Wolves look similar. I can't judge BV or Leicester yet. I believe you have a solid top three, weak second strings and weaker reserves. The team started to shape up well and then fell apart. In inclusion of Skornicki could have been viewed as some type of masterstroke, but I believe its a wrong and silly decision. I like Adam and he has been a good servant to the EL but time moves on and with a season out will struggle. Just my opinion of course. The reserves are weak. Clegg will be OK at home but both will struggle away from Monmore. So that's my opinion. Not trying to be confrontational to Wolves fans but I look at other teams and see better lineups. Many said much the same about PK,not just last season either and performed very well and held his own.Adams situation is different, he has been away for a while but should be able to perform well enough to be a decent 2nd string 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 (edited) Just waiting for Shovlar to give his opinion on the Wolves team. He normally says the same thing about 4 times a day. Wonder if he rates us or not. Edited December 23, 2016 by stevebrum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outofdarkness Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Just waiting for Shovlar to give his opinion on the Wolves team. He normally says the same thing about 4 times a day. Wonder if he rates us or not. Steve The only reason they have a dig at our team is deep down there frightened of us......we are the big bad WOLF.LOL 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 Steve The only reason they have a dig at our team is deep down there frightened of us......we are the big bad WOLF.LOL And the team that made them look 2nd best in October. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted December 23, 2016 Report Share Posted December 23, 2016 (edited) Nowt wrong with Arsene. Best manager in the league. No team stands head and shoulders but threet teams do stand out from the others. Kings Lynn, Rye House and Poole. Coventry and Wolves look similar. I can't judge BV or Leicester yet. I believe you have a solid top three, weak second strings and weaker reserves. The team started to shape up well and then fell apart. In inclusion of Skornicki could have been viewed as some type of masterstroke, but I believe its a wrong and silly decision. I like Adam and he has been a good servant to the EL but time moves on and with a season out will struggle. Just my opinion of course. The reserves are weak. Clegg will be OK at home but both will struggle away from Monmore. So that's my opinion. Not trying to be confrontational to Wolves fans but I look at other teams and see better lineups. If Wenger is the best in the league why isnt he top?When was the last time he won the league? Wolves have a weakness at reserve but Howarth and Skornicki should be ok in this weaker league Edited December 23, 2016 by foreverblue 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col Posted December 24, 2016 Report Share Posted December 24, 2016 Who should they have signed? Lindgen, yes. Best value #1 in the league on that average. Not Howarth. Who should have been the best reserve in the league last year. But wasn't. Not Skornicki. Who hasn't sat o a bike for 2 years. Masters or Throsell, yes, but not both. Clegg, yes. as a #7 not a #6. Greaves, no. But I hope he proves me wrong. He mentioned Manzares a few times, why I will never know Because Wolves 3rd signing after Lindgren & Clegg should have been Klindt. Manzares meant Klindt started the season at reserve, since Manzares was 0.01 higher averaged. Wolves should have given Manzares as long as it took for the first averages to come out to prove himself. If he hadn't before Klindt moved into the main body and before Manzares got a new average they could have re-declared. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdmc82 Posted December 24, 2016 Report Share Posted December 24, 2016 I think so far, Wolves are one of the strongest teams announced 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish keeper Posted December 24, 2016 Report Share Posted December 24, 2016 I think so far, Wolves are one of the strongest teams announced I'm not sure i think we are a little weak at reserve hope i'm proved wrong .Any way Merry Christmas to all Wolves supporters and bring on the new season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted December 24, 2016 Report Share Posted December 24, 2016 I think so far, Wolves are one of the strongest teams announced Don't tell Col or Shovlar. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fourentee Posted December 24, 2016 Report Share Posted December 24, 2016 Because Wolves 3rd signing after Lindgren & Clegg should have been Klindt. There may come a time, hopefully before the sun burns out, when you accept that riders have thrown off their shackles sufficiently to decide for themselves where they seek employment. Yes, Klindt would have been a good signing; yes, he's an asset; yes, when you look at the initial team building it appeared that he was a piece in the puzzle which would have fitted neatly. The hiatus before announcing the remainder of the line-up would suggest that there was something of an enforced re-think. But all this 'Wolves should have' is just howling at the moon if the rider would prefer to be somewhere else. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.