Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Wolves 2017


Recommended Posts

Ok tough man.

 

I'm right you are wrong.

 

If you are still struggling to count up to 3 then use you're fingers :rofl:

Annoying but so funny how you can continue to get things wrong on such a daily basis.

At least you are getting the attention trolls like you crave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must admit I thought if anyone from Freddie Jacob or Sam want coming back it would have been Freddie as he has new teams in Sweden and Poland and a full time GP rider in a very strong line up.

 

Think Bomber is already pencilled in and can't see Jacob not returning as he is like one of the family at the Adams house and really stepped up last season especially away

 

 

So Sam Masters is the most unlikey now out of those four but that's just my opinion and would certainly go with all four alongside Klindt Clegg and a 2,00 like Layne Culpitt who obviously has a good teacher ☺

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The less trolls the better, even if they are cry babies.

 

Anyway hopefully we can get this thread back to Wolves and not troll infested.

 

Is it possible to have a top 4 of Fred, Jacob, Sam and Bomber?

I'm guessing a huge gulf at the bottom?

Not sure what their precise averages are but I reckon the 4 of them combined would be around 38? Leaving 12 for the two reserves and a second stringer.

 

Personally think Wolves will decide against Masters (they'll choose Thorsell if they feel like it's a choice between the two, even though Jacob's average is a point higher) but who knows, would be good to see him back if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The less trolls the better, even if they are cry babies.

 

Anyway hopefully we can get this thread back to Wolves and not troll infested.

 

Is it possible to have a top 4 of Fred, Jacob, Sam and Bomber?

I'm guessing a huge gulf at the bottom?

Fred= 10.09

Jacob =9.88

Bomber =9.27

Masters=8.97

 

Would come to 38.21, leaving 11.79

Which with a 2 point reserve who is British

5.42 on Klindt= Would mean a very good top 5

4.37 to spend on the last reverse, or you could split the reserve points. Basically 6.37 to spend on reserves.

 

Fred being on 10.09 helps you guys so much compared to Doyle or a Holder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fred= 10.09

Jacob =9.88

Bomber =9.27

Masters=8.97

 

Would come to 38.21, leaving 11.79

Which with a 2 point reserve who is British

5.42 on Klindt= Would mean a very good top 5

4.37 to spend on the last reverse, or you could split the reserve points. Basically 6.37 to spend on reserves.

 

Fred being on 10.09 helps you guys so much compared to Doyle or a Holder.

Cheers for that - do you know what Howarth's average is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fred= 10.09

Jacob =9.88

Bomber =9.27

Masters=8.97

 

Would come to 38.21, leaving 11.79

Which with a 2 point reserve who is British

5.42 on Klindt= Would mean a very good top 5

4.37 to spend on the last reverse, or you could split the reserve points. Basically 6.37 to spend on reserves.

 

Fred being on 10.09 helps you guys so much compared to Doyle or a Holder.

So a top 5 of

Lindgren,thorsell,bomber

Back up of masters and klindt

Reserve max clegg and a junior would concevably be stronger than the starting 1-7from last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fred= 10.09

Jacob =9.88

Bomber =9.27

Masters=8.97

 

Would come to 38.21, leaving 11.79

Which with a 2 point reserve who is British

5.42 on Klindt= Would mean a very good top 5

4.37 to spend on the last reverse, or you could split the reserve points. Basically 6.37 to spend on reserves.

 

Fred being on 10.09 helps you guys so much compared to Doyle or a Holder.

 

 

takes up a fair whack then. Klindt did okay for Leicester so must be in the running. If we could get Jack Parkinson Blackburn or Jack Smith as a 2 pointer it might be worth the risk.

 

Cheers for that - do you know what Howarth's average is?

7.18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lindgren

Thorsell

Masters

Harris

Klindt

Clegg

2.00

 

I think it fits and would seriously take some beating.

Think I suggested exactly that team many pages back (possibly I had nicholls rather than harris), and that side is as strong as you can realistically put together undervthis points limit . Fred masters harris Klindt and clegg all excellent value on their averages.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think I suggested exactly that team many pages back (possibly I had nicholls rather than harris), and that side is as strong as you can realistically put together undervthis points limit . Fred masters harris Klindt and clegg all excellent value on their averages.

Not a bad team at all. Fair play if they came with that Team. Bomber may go somewhere where he is the main man though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what converted average riders come in on who only ride National league,but if you only have 2 points left for your top flight points total,then your probably looking at the bottom end of the scale from who to choose from.

 

A decent rider in that category would be someone like Kelsey Dugard.

 

 

Still think the side I put together would have taken some beating.

Adam Ellis(instead of Harris)with Clegg and Williamson at reserve.

Obviously,now cant happen with Adam signing for the Robins.

 

As regards Williamson,why make a rider a club asset and then not use him.

Hes 25 next birthday,so its not as if hes 19 or 20 like Clegg who is not an asset.

 

Not sure about Harris,if its a toss up between him and Thorssell,i would take Jacob,because there is still a lot more to come from him,whereas Bomber is past his best,and probably on a downward path.

 

Masters has already said hes very keen to come back,so you can probably pencil him into the side on his decent average.

 

What ever side Adams and CVS put together,it will be competitive,and would be a surprise if they don't make the top four,with the riders they have available to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wolves will be one of the favourites mainly due to Lindgren still having a low average so the team can be built strength in depth.

 

Assuming Lindgren has a good year like last season and not like the previous one. I do agree though, the Wolves team(s) suggested on here do look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy