waiheke1 Posted April 23, 2017 Report Share Posted April 23, 2017 So, whats up, had a bad day have you.. Thats the second dig at me in two posts.. Must have been a reason for it..You asked what scbs point was. I explained his point for you, even though it required no explanation for anyone else. Answering your question is a dig? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted April 23, 2017 Report Share Posted April 23, 2017 You asked what scbs point was. I explained his point for you, even though it required no explanation for anyone else. Answering your question is a dig? No as i said, must be a reason that Brady "alledgedly" didn't know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted April 23, 2017 Report Share Posted April 23, 2017 No as i said, must be a reason that Brady "alledgedly" didn't know.Some promoters aren't great communicator's?! Some riders get told by fans on twitter when a meeting is called off!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunRobin Posted April 24, 2017 Report Share Posted April 24, 2017 Absent 2-5, I think you'll find!? ;-) Sorry my mistake, typo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalan Posted April 24, 2017 Report Share Posted April 24, 2017 Yes the point is why wasn't Brady told when the decision was made? Not waiting til he got to the meeting? From the horses mouth Brady was told at 2.20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted April 24, 2017 Report Share Posted April 24, 2017 Surely the point is not the time of the day but why it took til raceday to confirm/announce the ruling when the team line-up inc. Kurtz, was advised 72 hours previously??! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalan Posted April 24, 2017 Report Share Posted April 24, 2017 Surely the point is not the time of the day but why it took til raceday to confirm/announce the ruling when the team line-up inc. Kurtz, was advised 72 hours previously??! That is my point, all was OK when the teams were declared but why at 2.20 on match day was it deemed not correct. Â If it was incorrect for Brady to guest should have been picked up straight away. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waiheke1 Posted April 24, 2017 Report Share Posted April 24, 2017 From the horses mouth Brady was told at 2.20ok fair enough, Skidder1 had posted only in thr pits.But I agree, it was picked up on here immediately that no guest was allowed, why did it take the authorities longer? Why did they allow Schlein to illegally guest for Riss against Poole? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted April 24, 2017 Report Share Posted April 24, 2017 Surely the point is not the time of the day but why it took til raceday to confirm/announce the ruling when the team line-up inc. Kurtz, was advised 72 hours previously??!Because Swindon get something like 48 hours to appeal the Somerset line up. That would be 24 before the meeting. Then the BSPA will need time to get together to agree what is right/wrong. I'm really not seeing the issue here. Just a few Poole fans who are shocked that a team have not been allowed to cheat. I guess it's a new one to them after all their stunts over the years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waiheke1 Posted April 24, 2017 Report Share Posted April 24, 2017 Because Swindon get something like 48 hours to appeal the Somerset line up. That would be 24 before the meeting. Then the BSPA will need time to get together to agree what is right/wrong. Â I'm really not seeing the issue here. Just a few Poole fans who are shocked that a team have not been allowed to cheat. I guess it's a new one to them after all their stunts over the years. Surely the issue is the ridiculous rule that puts the responsibility on the opposition, and not the authorities, to detect any illegality on a named line up? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 Because Swindon get something like 48 hours to appeal the Somerset line up. That would be 24 before the meeting. Then the BSPA will need time to get together to agree what is right/wrong. Â I'm really not seeing the issue here. Just a few Poole fans who are shocked that a team have not been allowed to cheat. I guess it's a new one to them after all their stunts over the years. But Swindon didn't appeal it!! Rosco was quite happy for Kurtz to race and said so publicly. My issue is that a rider and/or a promotion is out of pocket - if only for travelling expenses - because the authorities didn't act quickly enough!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces51 Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) It was the fault of the Somerset and Swindon promotions for not knowing the rules, it was the fault of whoever at the BSPA sanctioned it and it was the fault of the referee, who should certainly know the rules and should have told told all of the parties it was illegal when the teams were announced. Â Thank goodness the authorities can rely on some of the brighter BSF members to put them right. Edited April 25, 2017 by Aces51 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray c Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 And then you read that bspa over looked Kyle for the British semi finals after he declared he was fit againà 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poolebolton Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 And then you read that bspa over looked Kyle for the British semi finals after he declared he was fit againà I don't see why it was Wright. It's not good really because he is a Poole asset which is a little disappointing.  Any rumours on Matt getting anymore assets btw?  We know that Martin Vaculik might as well be an asset. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray c Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 I don't see why it was Wright. It's not good really because he is a Poole asset which is a little disappointing. Â Any rumours on Matt getting anymore assets btw? Â We know that Martin Vaculik might as well be an asset. Â don't think vaculik will ever ride for Poole now he is in the grand Prix just my opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 Well if you believe some on facebook, Vaculik will never ride regularly in the UK because he has a phobia of flying!!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWC Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 Assets need to be done away with no reason now that UK are using far less overseas riders. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirates Of Poole Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 Well if you believe some on facebook, Vaculik will never ride regularly in the UK because he has a phobia of flying!!? Wonder how he would have got on if he didn't make the GP's then as Matt confirmed he would have signed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poolebolton Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 Big rider will still want to race here. It the only place you can experience small tracks before the GP really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Bloke Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 Big rider will still want to race here. It the only place you can experience small tracks before the GP really. Are there many "small" tracks in the GP's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.