Aces51 Posted September 29, 2016 Report Share Posted September 29, 2016 (edited) I doubt any season ticket holders think it's free, they know it is because of the shortfall in meetings. However, it is a gesture that is appreciated because it means not having to bother going through the booking process for the final and that we get our regular seat. Edited September 29, 2016 by Aces51 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted September 29, 2016 Report Share Posted September 29, 2016 (edited) Make sure you buy your ticket on line, this looks as though its going to be a sell out. If its not then questions need to be asked.. Edited September 29, 2016 by Starman2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orion Posted September 29, 2016 Report Share Posted September 29, 2016 If its not then questions need to be asked.. Well they won't have ask about it at Poole 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodgy Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 nobody named his 'true identity' but had a guess without publicly outing him. Guessing means they don't know if they are publicly outing the person or a totally innocent party. If correct (as most think they are) the rules as you see demand a ban. If incorrect the often following abuse towards the innocent is far worse to me. You could have laughed off your naming and moved on. I've read you had / have your name on your profile - agree that doesn't give people the right to post it. However, as your nemesis has gone quiet I'm assuming the gang have sent him on holiday. If so, it does appear to me very contradicting. The rules should be the same for all, that was my meaning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 Guessing means they don't know if they are publicly outing the person or a totally innocent party. If correct (as most think they are) the rules as you see demand a ban. If incorrect the often following abuse towards the innocent is far worse to me. You could have laughed off your naming and moved on. I've read you had / have your name on your profile - agree that doesn't give people the right to post it. However, as your nemesis has gone quiet I'm assuming the gang have sent him on holiday. If so, it does appear to me very contradicting. The rules should be the same for all, that was my meaning. He isn't my nemesis, trolls arent capable of being such a thing. Someone who demands to maintain their privacy (by failing to back up these so called claims one can only assume that they want to keep there identity secret or is just plain lying) has no right to put anything personal or naming of another individual. My name isn't on my profile so the troll has got it off somewhere else which makes him very worrying. Sadly someone that courts controversy and attention will get people actively engaged so you can't claim innocence and fairness if your whole intention is to claim to be something you aren't prepared to back up. Think a lot of people tried to call his bluff. Right or wrong? No idea. Has he been banned? No idea . It won't be the first time it won't be the last. No one has a right to be named unless that person says it's okay to do so, there is no defence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodgy Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 No one has a right to be named unless that person says it's okay to do so, there is no defence. Which is what I said - and it works both ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 Which is what I said - and it works both ways. Of course. One person named another, the other not named so if only it worked both ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodgy Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 Of course. One person named another, the other not named so if only it worked both ways. Now you're missing the point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 Now you're missing the point. I get it, it SHOULD work both ways. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.