Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Poole Sign Lindback


Recommended Posts

Yes but if they hadn't reassessed Lindback he wouldn't have fitted in the cheating scumbags team :rolleyes:

I am loving the fact you are so pi55ed off by it. What did Swindon do this season? Nothing. When they could have made changes they didn't. At Poole riders know they have to perform, and that's what makes Poole the most successful team in the modern era.

 

Keep chompin on those sour grapes..,chomp chomp chomp.... Lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am loving the fact you are so pi55ed off by it. What did Swindon do this season? Nothing. When they could have made changes they didn't. At Poole riders know they have to perform, and that's what makes Poole the most successful team in the modern era.

Keep chompin on those sour grapes..,chomp chomp chomp.... Lol

Ha! Ha! Ha!

 

You are so funny - NOT and trying so hard to get me to bite on that rubbish you write. You need to try harder

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we had a good team all year quite honestly. Couldn't believe how well we did at wolves recently. I was there but still not impressed.

One guy who does impress me is wofinden - even though he stuffed it into the fence on the second turn. He is some rider.

 

I do wonder how one sorts out this league. You can have a good team and then injuries come in and it all goes to .......... that is any team, not poole.

We really have to look at a team like in football - not just 7 riders - or am I barking up the wrong tree - or just barking ha ha!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought it was re-assessed if he hasn't been riding in this country for so many seasons.You don't have to ask for it.

Hancock wasn't 2 years ago, and AJ WAS (9.03) last year.

Tai kept his 7.03 this year but others on a 7.

So two riders rumoured to be in the Poole 2017 lineup finish second and third in tonights SEC.

Milik reassessed as a 7 tho, seems fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you getting that figure from when his last figure was 7.94?

It a re-assessed reassessment ?

He had an average of 6.34 from 11 meetings when last riding over here. The bspa have taken that figure as his official average and increased it to 7. Edited by Steve Shovlar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.Magic=8.97

2.Kacper G=5.51

3.Kurtz=6.40

4.Vaclav Milik=5.67

5.Krzysztof Kasprzak= 7.91

6.J.Holder= 4.01

7.Adam Ellis= 4

 

42.47= total score. How about this team??? For next season.

 

Magic has had a pretty torid season so may be looking to come back but rather Noddy to be honest and a lower average meaning more points to play with. Not Gomolski. Again not improved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, with Kacper. Steve what about Brady very good but big average which could hurt us. Vaclav Milik is a must sign IMO just scores points. What about Batch in for Kacper and Holder for Magic that would give us another 1 point who would we get though? Will Noddy stay with his brother? Surely that is an attraction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has V.Milik been reassessed?

 

Who can tell.

It seems that 7 is the official line this month, it might be different next month.

Because it was 11 meetings. 6.34. Upped to 7.00.

Shame the BSPA didn't recognise it at the time.

It's about time they found some consistency to applying rules.

Hancock kept his old average 2014, AJ re-assessed to 9.03, whilst a rider much better than AJ this season is assessed 2 points lower, ditto Dudek.

That's a snap at the governing body, not any one club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though the rules allowed Lindback's average to be reassesed, i don't see why it was? If his old average was 7.94 i'd say that's an acceptable averages & there is no reason to change it!


1.Magic=8.97

2.Kacper G=5.51

3.Kurtz=6.40

4.Vaclav Milik=5.67

5.Krzysztof Kasprzak= 7.91

6.J.Holder= 4.01

7.Adam Ellis= 4

 

42.47= total score. How about this team??? For next season.

How would Ellis be on a 4.00 average?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy