Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Belle Vue V Poole, 12/9/16 Rear Wheels Spinning At Tapes


Recommended Posts

Rohan looks to be ok as the rule states the back wheel should be in contact with the track surface at which point the start marshall signals to the ref.

1. It does not state the rear wheel should be stationary

2. The wheel, even when spinning is in contact with the surface

3. The rule does not state that the wheel cannot start spinning between the start marshall signalling to the ref and the rising of the tapes.

 

If you are going to have rules they need to e 100% clear and unambiguous.

 

F1 teams have groups of people going over the rules with a magnifying glass and lawyer and find loopholes that they can use to their advantage.

 

Matt does the same but to a lesser degree and I understand takes the rule book to bed with him each night and studies each line before he goes to sleep.

Edited by A ORLOV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rear wheel cannot be spinning at the start- it has to be stationary. Anything else is cheating and against the rules definately.

But the rule quoted above does not state that. It should have the words the wheel should be stationary and not be spinning from the time the green light goes on till the tapes rise. The use of every word, positioning of every comma and the grammar used can change the meaning of what is printed.

This is not to say there is another rule not quoted that states the tyre cannot be warmed by spinning it on the surface.

Edited by A ORLOV
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the rule quoted above does not state that. It should have the words the wheel should be stationary and not be spinning from the time the green light goes on till the tapes rise. The use of every word, positioning of every comma and the grammar used can change the meaning of what is printed.

This is not to say there is another rule not quoted that states the tyre cannot be warmed by spinning it on the surface.

The difficulty is if you start explaining in even greater detail how and what is not allowed, the rule back would probably quadruple in size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difficulty is if you start explaining in even greater detail how and what is not allowed, the rule back would probably quadruple in size.

Unfortunately that is correct.

During one period of time I used to read and take to bits, in order to find loopholes, in other peoples and companies patents.

Matt seems to do the same with the bspa rule book, which is how he is able to continually beat all the other promoters when signing riders, building teams and replacing riders.

It seems that the bspa are not capable of writing precise detailed rules, which leave loopholes anyone could drive a juggernaut through.

You have only to look at some of the spelling and grammar used on tweets and communications etc by certain promoters to see why they are not capable of writing a clear and precise rule book. I have no idea if they write the rules or get someone in to do it.

Edited by A ORLOV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having discussed this with a referee a few years ago it was agreed between the two of us that the only way you can exclude a rider for this is to claim the rear wheel is not in contact with the ground.

 

Said referee had exclaimed Richie Hawkins the week before at Somerset and argued with him on the phone about if he was right or not and the referee was sure eh was right but was a little unsure himself!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately that is correct.

During one period of time I used to read and take to bits, in order to find loopholes, in other peoples and companies patents.

Matt seems to do the same with the bspa rule book, which is how he is able to continually beat all the other promoters when signing riders, building teams and replacing riders.

It seems that the bspa are not capable of writing precise detailed rules, which leave loopholes anyone could drive a juggernaut through.

You have only to look at some of the spelling and grammar used on tweets and communications etc by certain promoters to see why they are not capable of writing a clear and precise rule book. I have no idea if they write the rules or get someone in to do it.

 

And have you noticed how the calls for more detail in the rules often come from exactly the same places as the ones advocating a shorter rulebook
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy