A ORLOV Posted September 17, 2016 Report Share Posted September 17, 2016 (edited) Rohan looks to be ok as the rule states the back wheel should be in contact with the track surface at which point the start marshall signals to the ref. 1. It does not state the rear wheel should be stationary 2. The wheel, even when spinning is in contact with the surface 3. The rule does not state that the wheel cannot start spinning between the start marshall signalling to the ref and the rising of the tapes. If you are going to have rules they need to e 100% clear and unambiguous. F1 teams have groups of people going over the rules with a magnifying glass and lawyer and find loopholes that they can use to their advantage. Matt does the same but to a lesser degree and I understand takes the rule book to bed with him each night and studies each line before he goes to sleep. Edited September 17, 2016 by A ORLOV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racers and royals Posted September 18, 2016 Report Share Posted September 18, 2016 The rear wheel cannot be spinning at the start- it has to be stationary. Anything else is cheating and against the rules definately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A ORLOV Posted September 18, 2016 Report Share Posted September 18, 2016 (edited) The rear wheel cannot be spinning at the start- it has to be stationary. Anything else is cheating and against the rules definately. But the rule quoted above does not state that. It should have the words the wheel should be stationary and not be spinning from the time the green light goes on till the tapes rise. The use of every word, positioning of every comma and the grammar used can change the meaning of what is printed. This is not to say there is another rule not quoted that states the tyre cannot be warmed by spinning it on the surface. Edited September 18, 2016 by A ORLOV 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted September 18, 2016 Report Share Posted September 18, 2016 But the rule quoted above does not state that. It should have the words the wheel should be stationary and not be spinning from the time the green light goes on till the tapes rise. The use of every word, positioning of every comma and the grammar used can change the meaning of what is printed. This is not to say there is another rule not quoted that states the tyre cannot be warmed by spinning it on the surface. The difficulty is if you start explaining in even greater detail how and what is not allowed, the rule back would probably quadruple in size. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agrotron Posted September 18, 2016 Report Share Posted September 18, 2016 Its up to the referee to pick this up if they don't know the rules that's there problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A ORLOV Posted September 18, 2016 Report Share Posted September 18, 2016 (edited) The difficulty is if you start explaining in even greater detail how and what is not allowed, the rule back would probably quadruple in size. Unfortunately that is correct. During one period of time I used to read and take to bits, in order to find loopholes, in other peoples and companies patents. Matt seems to do the same with the bspa rule book, which is how he is able to continually beat all the other promoters when signing riders, building teams and replacing riders. It seems that the bspa are not capable of writing precise detailed rules, which leave loopholes anyone could drive a juggernaut through. You have only to look at some of the spelling and grammar used on tweets and communications etc by certain promoters to see why they are not capable of writing a clear and precise rule book. I have no idea if they write the rules or get someone in to do it. Edited September 18, 2016 by A ORLOV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmo Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 I remember matej kus being excluded at Redcar for having his wheel spinning after being warned about doing it in an earlier heat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 Having discussed this with a referee a few years ago it was agreed between the two of us that the only way you can exclude a rider for this is to claim the rear wheel is not in contact with the ground. Said referee had exclaimed Richie Hawkins the week before at Somerset and argued with him on the phone about if he was right or not and the referee was sure eh was right but was a little unsure himself! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnieg Posted September 20, 2016 Report Share Posted September 20, 2016 Unfortunately that is correct. During one period of time I used to read and take to bits, in order to find loopholes, in other peoples and companies patents. Matt seems to do the same with the bspa rule book, which is how he is able to continually beat all the other promoters when signing riders, building teams and replacing riders. It seems that the bspa are not capable of writing precise detailed rules, which leave loopholes anyone could drive a juggernaut through. You have only to look at some of the spelling and grammar used on tweets and communications etc by certain promoters to see why they are not capable of writing a clear and precise rule book. I have no idea if they write the rules or get someone in to do it. And have you noticed how the calls for more detail in the rules often come from exactly the same places as the ones advocating a shorter rulebook 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waiheke1 Posted September 20, 2016 Report Share Posted September 20, 2016 Tbh it could be possible to add more detail where needed and still shorten the rule book. The issue is do much of it is horribly written and ambiguous. Clear and concise doesn't rule out explicit detail where needed. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Posted September 21, 2016 Report Share Posted September 21, 2016 Difficult to imagine it being the best and most consistent way to gate so if the front wheel isn't moving it's good enough in my view. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trees Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 So has Rohan got found out re this wheel spinning? Did he do it at Somerset this season? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.