diamond@heart Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 haven't got a clue how it works, or how other authorities get priority over Nationals. TBH, imo, the statement out looks like nonsense and, the fact it says that Lambert is not being released makes it look more suspicious. if he is not being released, will he not face some sort of ban ? Why, he's not with holding his services and it is beyond the control of Newcastle and the SCB/BSPA. If he does not ride for his Polish club I dare say he will suffer some sort of consequence and the same may be levelled if he does not ride for Newcastle. I don't see how he can win. I think the not being released is in relation to the Holder incident at Peterborough. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevePark Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 well thats good then. so what will it be, r/r or 3pt NL ? Â I'm guessing, because there is no facility allowed, it will be an NL 2.00pter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diamond@heart Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 well thats good then. so what will it be, r/r or 3pt NL ? By reading the article it sounds like it will be a NL rider in his place. "without the services of number 1 Robert Lambert and with no facility to cover his absence. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruffdiamond Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 I'm guessing, because there is no facility allowed, it will be an NL 2.00pter. Â thats even better then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diamond@heart Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 Â I'm guessing, because there is no facility allowed, it will be an NL 2.00pter. Beat me to it!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruffdiamond Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 (edited) Surely tho,,, if the British authorities had 'tried' to assist and failed, they could have at least granted a facility. Edited September 1, 2017 by ruffdiamond 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevePark Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 Surely tho,,, if the British authorities had 'tried' to assist and failed, they could have at least granted a facility. Â You would have thought so, but you forget one thing.... this is speedway... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruffdiamond Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 You would have thought so, but you forget one thing.... this is speedway... Yeah, its a bit like the 'ghost train', the further you go in, the scarier it gets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diamond@heart Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 Yeah, its a bit like the 'ghost train', the further you go in, the scarier it gets. I dread to think who the guy in the monkey suit is who used to just out or hang on the back of the car!!!! Answers on a postcard :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Max Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 Â I'm guessing, because there is no facility allowed, it will be an NL 2.00pter. Â Absolute madness!! Â I still fancy Diamonds to win, but this has deprived the supporters (hello remember us we pay the bills!) of a rider who would have top races with Bears big boys and given us someone who will probably tootle around! Â Absolute madness!! (just felt I had to say it twice) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevePark Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 Â Absolute madness!! Â I still fancy Diamonds to win, but this has deprived the supporters (hello remember us we pay the bills!) of a rider who would have top races with Bears big boys and given us someone who will probably tootle around! Â Absolute madness!! (just felt I had to say it twice) Â It really does make you wonder why we bother sometimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KEITH M Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 I might be wrong but I think the national league rider assumes Robert Lambert's average. . What if that rider falls off in his first race and hurts himself wink wink could we not use injury rider replacement for rest of meeting 😀 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheviot Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 why cant we just use r/r so all our top riders can cover his rides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 Crazy - if the Polish fixture has to take priority a facility should be granted. Â I like Keiths IRR idea though 😆 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruffdiamond Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 I might be wrong but I think the national league rider assumes Robert Lambert's average. . What if that rider falls off in his first race and hurts himself wink wink could we not use injury rider replacement for rest of meeting Crazy - if the Polish fixture has to take priority a facility should be granted. I like Keiths IRR idea though are you suggesting we cheat, or 'stage' an accident,,, ffffing barmy, but brilliant plan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 I might be wrong but I think the national league rider assumes Robert Lambert's average. . What if that rider falls off in his first race and hurts himself wink wink could we not use injury rider replacement for rest of meeting I'll pass that on to George. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leander Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 haven't got a clue how it works, or how other authorities get priority over Nationals. TBH, imo, the statement out looks like nonsense and, the fact it says that Lambert is not being released makes it look more suspicious. if he is not being released, will he not face some sort of ban ? The main problem is the fact that the Redcar fixture is a re-arranged date, and the Polish play-off dates have been in since before the start of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diamond@heart Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 Personally I think we should tell the Poles to F*** O** 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcatdiary Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 I'm guessing, because there is no facility allowed, it will be an NL 2.00pter. Â NDL G*: a rider eligible for a NDL Team who has never achieved an actual PL MA of 4.00 or above and not currently in a Premiership or Championship 1-7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparks123 Posted September 1, 2017 Report Share Posted September 1, 2017 I might be wrong but I think the national league rider assumes Robert Lambert's average. . What if that rider falls off in his first race and hurts himself wink wink could we not use injury rider replacement for rest of meeting Why not have the NL rider twist his ankle on the parade?He then doesn't have to fall off and you can then have IRR for heat 1 also. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.