Aces51 Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 (edited) The great Peter Craven was only 5 foot 2 and weighed under 8 stones. Not sure what that is in foreign measures. Edited February 23, 2017 by Aces51 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Scrutton Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 I remember Billy Bales of Norwich Yarmouth and Sheffield (after Norwich closed) He to was very short and I think that he also had to have his frames lowered. He was another very exciting rider to watch. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemini Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 (edited) Johnnie Chamberlain at 4ft 9ins must surely be the smallest rider ever? Â https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150147809132785&set=a.10150144289657785.323814.550797784&type=3&theater Edited February 23, 2017 by Gemini Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dodger Blue Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 Tiddler Turner was always good value, one memory that will always be with me, is a Bank Holiday meeting against Belle Vue at Lynn from the mid 70's. Tiddler was shoulder to shoulder with Alan Wilkinson down the back straight and they were kicking each other as they battled for the lead!! Â Marvelous stuff!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semion Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 As I recall Tiddler always had trouble getting out of the gate. Being as there wasn't much of him he use to spin up at the gate when he dropped the Clutch and seemed to hang on with as much weight over the front of the bike to keep it down. Always good value, and a full throttle type of guy. Good Third heat leader/ first 2nd string in the team consisting of Lee, Betts and Hellsen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnglishRoundabout Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 As I recall Tiddler always had trouble getting out of the gate. Being as there wasn't much of him he use to spin up at the gate when he dropped the Clutch and seemed to hang on with as much weight over the front of the bike to keep it down. Always good value, and a full throttle type of guy. Good Third heat leader/ first 2nd string in the team consisting of Lee, Betts and Hellsen. Rohan Tungate has a similar gating style. Leans over the handlebars more than others to get the required traction. Speaking with other riders, they do say that being small/light is a definite advantage for a speedway rider  What I would say is that if they are small in stature, then they sure need to be tough into the first turn. I can recall Leigh Adams 'dealing ' with Bjerre rather uncompromisingly at Blunsdon a few times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waytogo28 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 Billy Bales must have been one of the shortest riders of all time? Definitely had lowered frames. Still going strong now - not quite 100. So let's plan a Big Party ( or join in if one is already underway) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces51 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 I think that Billy and Peter Craven were of similar height. Billy was a brilliant rider, not in the very top echelon but capable of beating the very best riders and a good solid heat leader. Delighted to hear he is still going strong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semion Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 Think Billy Bales might in closing in on 90 not 100... Seems to recall he was born in the late 20's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starboy118 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 Think Billy Bales might in closing in on 90 not 100... Seems to recall he was born in the late 20's  Born in 1929. I remember watching him for one season together with Fundin, Nygren, Hedge and others. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Game On Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 Â Born in 1929. I remember watching him for one season together with Fundin, Nygren, Hedge and others. Your doing well 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agrotron Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 Steve Schofield was a short arse as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starboy118 Posted February 26, 2017 Report Share Posted February 26, 2017 Your doing well  That's very kind of you to say so 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunce Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 (edited) Billy Bales still lives in Hellesdon, 5 minutes from the site of the old Firs Stadium. He is 87 years old now. Many years ago after he retired from speedway, he ran a car repair business not far from his home, and used to look after my car for me. Lovely bloke. Edited February 28, 2017 by Superstars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 Does anyone know if any of the rumoured track changes over the winter (i.e. to improve the racing) are still on the cards for 2017? Â I recall someone mentioning potential shale changes were being looked into. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g13webb Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Does anyone know if any of the rumoured track changes over the winter (i.e. to improve the racing) are still on the cards for 2017? Â I recall someone mentioning potential shale changes were being looked into. Â Probably in an ideal existence changing the shale would be advantageous for better speedway racing, but in the real world, where costs are paramount, the shale has to be able to used by the Stock Cars as well. Swapping the topping depending on the event has to be really excessive . From all accounts, Lynn is one of the few tracks that are viably run, so if, by using the substandard shale allows the track to operate, and we can continue to have a club to support then I for one won't be complaining..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flappy Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Would like to see PUK ride for panthers in the challenge match to even up the sides 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWP Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Does anyone know if any of the rumoured track changes over the winter (i.e. to improve the racing) are still on the cards for 2017? I recall someone mentioning potential shale changes were being looked into. Been with Buster today. He has removed all the old shale down to the base and when he is not swearing about the weather, is replacing it with new shale. Needs to go down dry and stay dry to pack it. Track will be very good and all looking forward to the start of the season 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shale Searcher Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 (edited)  Probably in an ideal existence changing the shale would be advantageous for better speedway racing, but in the real world, where costs are paramount, the shale has to be able to used by the Stock Cars as well. Swapping the topping depending on the event has to be really excessive . From all accounts, Lynn is one of the few tracks that are viably run, so if, by using the substandard shale allows the track to operate, and we can continue to have a club to support then I for one won't be complaining.....  You mention that "Having sub-standard shale" helps to keep the club operating.. or words to that effect... How many Speedway supporters have abandoned the Speedway because of this? How much gate money has been sacrificed? How many paying adults now do not attend Speedway racing at Saddlebow Rd per meeting? 100? 200? 300? 400?  Just say for the purpose of costings you've lost 200 paying adults per meeting..... at say £30 per fan, taking into account stadium admission, 1 programme, 1 food, 2 drinks, that equates per meeting, lost revenue of £6,000!!  That's just at 200 lost fans, so a drop in crowd from 1,600 to 1,400, not taking into account any additional children, and their mates.....  You telling me that you could not remove and swap the top racing surface for less than £6,000 per meeting??  That would surely be a no-brainer, or have Lynn, riding on sub-standard shale, providing sub-standard Speedway racing, actually hasn't effected the crowd levels that much? Even losing half that, 100 paying adults would cost £3,000 loss in meeting revenue..!!  Can someone explain the true cost of a shale swap between cars and Speedway per meeting? Can't be £3,000 per pop? Even including some new shale, and labour? Edited March 1, 2017 by Shale Searcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g13webb Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 You mention that "Having sub-standard shale" helps to keep the club operating.. or words to that effect... How many Speedway supporters have abandoned the Speedway because of this? How much gate money has been sacrificed? How many paying adults now do not attend Speedway racing at Saddlebow Rd per meeting? 100? 200? 300? 400?  Just say for the purpose of costings you've lost 200 paying adults per meeting..... at say £30 per fan, taking into account stadium admission, 1 programme, 1 food, 2 drinks, that equates per meeting, lost revenue of £6,000!!  That's just at 200 lost fans, so a drop in crowd from 1,600 to 1,400, not taking into account any additional children, and their mates.....  You telling me that you could not remove and swap the top racing surface for less than £6,000 per meeting??  That would surely be a no-brainer, or have Lynn, riding on sub-standard shale, providing sub-standard Speedway racing, actually hasn't effected the crowd levels that much? Even losing half that, 100 paying adults would cost £3,000 loss in meeting revenue..!!  Can someone explain the true cost of a shale swap between cars and Speedway per meeting? Can't be £3,000 per pop? Even including some new shale, and labour?  Sometimes the top dressing at Lynn is very good , other times it's pretty poor. I know nothing of the cost or the volume of shale a track needs to be able to answer your questions, When I have spoken to Buster on the subject in the past, he has said that any top dressing has to be useable for both Stock Car and Speedway. Changing the topping for each meeting would create many problems. Like I say, I know nothing about track preparation and have to take Buster's word. He obviously knows his job and has accessed the financial implications , why should he lie about it.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.