sparkafag Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Oh and as for the supposedly Darcy Ward Facebook post If you really believe it was Darcy then any credibility you did have has gone...dear oh dear oh dear. Did you even bother to look at the post......it was evidently posted from his profile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris4gillian Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Did you even bother to look at the post......it was evidently posted from his profile. Yes I did and again if you really believe it was Darcy himself then that's your prerogative, I however don't believe it was...which is my prerogative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparkafag Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Yes I did and again if you really believe it was Darcy himself then that's your prerogative, I however don't believe it was...which is my prerogative. It was a post that was written and posted via his Facebook page, to suggest it was him hardly removes someone’s credibility…. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Of course it was written by Darcy. Does someone actually believe his facebook account was hacked so someone could just make a post against Woffinden? Darcy was just peed off with all the bullcrap Woffinden was sprouting. Even Batchelor came on that thread and liked one of the replies. I know my post about the points money is 100% correct and true. Even Woffindens pal has argued that is the way it should be next year, which as Savalascloutingu21champ has pointed out it more or less confirms my info. I cannot divulge my source which leaves the nay sayers with ammunition to dismiss what I have said. But for those that wanted to know one of the main reasons, well that's been cleaned up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Lady Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 (edited) FWIW I prefer to believe the word of people I have known (on and off the net) for quite a number of years rather than people I have never met and know only from some rants on BSF. We all have to make our own minds up as to who we believe. For the record I've never met Gavan, Chris4gillian, Robert72 or Dazzafl , doesn't mean I don't believe some of what they say, simply that I put more credence into what's said by folk I know. Edited September 2, 2016 by Star Lady Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert72 Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Yes I did and again if you really believe it was Darcy himself then that's your prerogative, I however don't believe it was...which is my prerogative. Not seen anywhere Darcy denying the comment so it's clear he said it. Time to accept it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris4gillian Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 I know for a fact that what you've been told SS is simply not true, maybe you (unlike robert72) might have the balls to ask Tai yourself face to face the next time Wolves are at Wimborne Road...possibly during the play offs should we be facing them? Or are you going to Monmore next Monday? If so, you can speak to him then. I'd love to be a fly on the wall to see you shot down in flames My source is a personal friend of Tai's, yours is a 'fictitious' somebody who you won't name but are happy to quote. Utterly and completely laughable. Oh and I don't accept something I know isn't true robert72. Like the fact I don't accept you are an ex-rider who lined up against ex-world champions...something else that simply isn't true. As for 'Darcygate' you guys believe what you wish, just Iike I myself do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparkafag Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 As for 'Darcygate' you guys believe what you wish, just Iike I myself do. That’s mental, there is no “Darcygate” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris4gillian Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 That’s mental, there is no “Darcygate” EXACTLY my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 That’s mental, there is no “Darcygate” Nope, but there is a good chance there is Darcy 'messing around' which he and Tai have been known to do to each other before.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris4gillian Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Nope, but there is a good chance there is Darcy 'messing around' which he and Tai have been known to do to each other before.. Com on BW, don't say something sensible or you'll ruin things for them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparkafag Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 (edited) EXACTLY my point. No there is no “Darcygate” because the post was made from his account, you have then attempted to fabricate a scenario and attempt to question the credibility of others who say your scenario isn’t the case, that’s literally mental. Edited September 2, 2016 by The Mockingjay 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 I know for a fact that what you've been told SS is simply not true, maybe you (unlike robert72) might have the balls to ask Tai yourself face to face the next time Wolves are at Wimborne Road...possibly during the play offs should we be facing them? Or are you going to Monmore next Monday? If so, you can speak to him then. I'd love to be a fly on the wall to see you shot down in flames My source is a personal friend of Tai's, yours is a 'fictitious' somebody who you won't name but are happy to quote. Utterly and completely laughable. Oh and I don't accept something I know isn't true robert72. Like the fact I don't accept you are an ex-rider who lined up against ex-world champions...something else that simply isn't true. As for 'Darcygate' you guys believe what you wish, just Iike I myself do. I don't care what bullcrap you have been fed but what I have said is right. If not, then why doesn't Woffinden release a press statement putting his side of the story? You seem to just believe everything you have been fed from dazzafl (who is this Darren Fletcher?) who is mates with Woffinden and wouldn't have a word said against him no matter what. A simple statement from Woffinden is all that is required. Not asking a lot, is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Beevers Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 I know for a fact that what you've been told SS is simply not true, maybe you (unlike robert72) might have the balls to ask Tai yourself face to face the next time Wolves are at Wimborne Road...possibly during the play offs should we be facing them? Or are you going to Monmore next Monday? If so, you can speak to him then. I'd love to be a fly on the wall to see you shot down in flames My source is a personal friend of Tai's, yours is a 'fictitious' somebody who you won't name but are happy to quote. Utterly and completely laughable. Interesting after reading the last 20 pages that all the usual posters except for John Leslie/Darcys Onion are here argueing over if they like Tai or not and the same debates as before and as usual Sidney the Robin throwing personal insults at posters. It is like Deja Vu to the other Tai thread that had 200 posts. Regardless, I can see how Steve Shovlar's source could be correct on this matter and that would make a lot of sense why he hasn't spoken out about the matter. In regards, to your source chris4gillian, you cannot really say my source said otherwise without actually saying what your source says in regards to the whole situation. If that makes sense. Say what your source has exactly said why Tai Woffinden has fallen out with Team GB because disagreeing with a completely understandable and very probable theory that Steve Shovlar gave in depth in his post just doesn't cut the mustard with me, I am afraid unless you can give a more detailed view instead of 'Oh no, he didn't ' Having heard Steve Shovlar's source evidence on this one, I don't really know what to say in regards to right or wrong. Principle is wrong but I could understand Tai outscoring everyone by 12-15 points for the next 5 years and financially you would feel a bit disappointed if your team wasn't matching that. But in everyday jobs, this happens a lot but speedway isn't your everyday job so I don't really know what to think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 No there is no “Darcygate” because the post was made from his account, you have then attempted to fabricate a scenario and attempt to question the credibility of others who say your scenario isn’t the case, that’s literally mental. Now they are trying to say, it was just a lark, when Ward was just fed up with all the BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Its all a it tedious now,it's been done to death. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Its all a it tedious now,it's been done to death. Agree to a point, though in fact it won't go away until the fans are told officially what has happened. If the sport had a higher profile Woffinden wouldn't be allowed to stay silent and would have been hounded by the press for a statement. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lisa-colette Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Love the people who blindly defend Tai like he is some sort of innocent golden boy who does nothing wrong. So you have two Aussie riders supposedly calling him out on it and you dismiss it. I think Darcy and Batch know him a bit more than you C4G!!! Lmao!! :D 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The White Knight Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Agree to a point, though in fact it won't go away until the fans are told officially what has happened. If the sport had a higher profile Woffinden wouldn't be allowed to stay silent and would have been hounded by the press for a statement. That is the nub of the matter. Apart from that, whatever happened to privacy? If Tai asked for more than his share of monies - in a Team game I think he is wrong, as I said earlier. However at the end of the day what does it really matter. We are not entitled to know all of Tai's business. What he does and says is up to him. We all have things we would like to keep private and Tai is no different. All I have read on here is largely conjecture from folk who say - so and so said this, and so and so said that. I am not saying anyone is lying but I would rather wait until the full story emerges, If the story does not emerge, then I will keep an open mind, but if Tai wishes to keep this private then I respect that - it is his RIGHT to do so. It is also right that the BSPA keep their talks with Tai private too. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Lady Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 It is also right that the BSPA keep their talks with Tai private too. Which they have done, and I agree rightly so. It was Tai's rant on social media that catapulted the subject into the public domain which IMO sort of lost him the right to privacy on this particular subject. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.