Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Elegibility For Nl


Recommended Posts

Spiller was born in Britain and so was Hamill and so both can have a British passport if they don't already have one. ...

 

I say good luck to spiller riding for Germany in the u21s it gives him invaluable experience that he would not have otherwise had. Hopefully this will make him a better rider for when he rides for team GB in the future.

Hamill has no entitlement to British nationality whatsoever as far as I can see. Being born in the UK does not give entitlement to British citizenship unless you have British parents.

 

Spiller has dual nationality (and on his own website describes his nationality as 'German and British' - in that order) so it is quite possible he may decide to go down the German route. I'd welcome into the Team GB set up but I wouldn't take it for granted he'll end up wearing a Union Jack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Ellis was born in Marmande to British parents, he was registered with the British embassy and had a british passport from the age of 3 months. You try telling him he's French and see what answer you get .

 

 

just saying

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're a bit late here. If you're referring to Rutherford's replacement then they've already signed him and Chris Hay is very British!

 

I gather that there's another signing on the horizon...

Edited by uk martin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard Hall wants a team place,and would do National League,but strangely is not allowed even though he comply with the rules Answer needed from B S P A please

 

Richard is allowed to ride NL but has to come in on his last CL average from 2004.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard is allowed to ride NL but has to come in on his last CL average from 2004.

Which would be fair enough IF Luke Bowen had come in to the Kent team on his 2006/7 average. But ...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which would be fair enough IF Luke Bowen had come in to the Kent team on his 2006/7 average. But ...

It still wouldn't be fair because that would explicitly go against the rules, which clearly states you only use averages from 2011 onwards. That would just make the Hall decision consistent but both illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy