Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Poole V Coventry Ela. 20/04/16


Recommended Posts

I thought the rules say only r/r for a non-doubling-up 2nd string = but I may be wrong what with my recent understanding of the rules!!!!!? :D:wink:

 

 

Much more of a concern - and no doubt lengthy debate - will be the line-ups for the return fixture on Friday!! (But I'll wait for the thread before getting into it!!)

Oh no, why, who is missing??

 

Quick someone start the thread!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no, why, who is missing??

 

Quick someone start the thread!!!

No Holder I know that.

I thought the rules say only r/r for a non-doubling-up 2nd string = but I may be wrong what with my recent understanding of the rules!!!!!? :D:wink:

 

 

Much more of a concern - and no doubt lengthy debate - will be the line-ups for the return fixture on Friday!! (But I'll wait for the thread before getting into it!!)

I said replacement not guest 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coventry probably not his fave track either. There seems to be some confusion about what replacement we will be allowed according to the world of twitter..

I can see no reason why we wouldn't be allowed a guest. He is our number one. If the Torun meeting is not a rearranged fixture, Holder by not being a Brit doesn't have to put uk first, unfortunately.

 

A guest should be allowed. If we have to run with a 3 pointer Coventry will get the points in a hollow victory which will be poor for everyone.

Edited by Steve Shovlar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see no reason why we wouldn't be allowed a guest. He is our number one. If the Torun meeting is not a rearranged fixture, Holder by not being a Brit doesn't have to put uk first, unfortunately.

 

A guest should be allowed. If we have to run with a 3 pointer Coventry will get the points in a hollow victory which will be poor for everyone.

Well I guess you know how hollow victorys feel. Eastbourne and Belle Vue away spring easily to my mind

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see no reason why we wouldn't be allowed a guest. He is our number one. If the Torun meeting is not a rearranged fixture, Holder by not being a Brit doesn't have to put uk first, unfortunately.

 

A guest should be allowed. If we have to run with a 3 pointer Coventry will get the points in a hollow victory which will be poor for everyone.

Is he Polish then? It's only April and I'm cheesed off already with what looks like another season of guests/rider replacements. If Holder chooses to ride for Torun rather than Poole then it should be a National League rider as a replacement. You can borrow one from the Storm if you like.

How bloody hard is it to arrange fixtures when both teams have all their riders available?!

Too hard apparently.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very disappointing that we don't go to Coventry at full strength. A gues is never the same. If Holder scored five then fair enough he has a duffer and we lose. If a guest scores five then we lost because of that and Holder would have scored more etc etc.

 

Guess we will discover who Matt has lined up in the next couple of days.

It wasn't a choice for Holder, the Torun fixture was on the list first so he rides there. Surely its not difficult to have another side ride Friday night instead.

This is something that could be avoided. The fixtures come out far too late and other leagues have their fixtures sorted way before the uk.

 

Whoever planned Fridays Cov v Poole meeting must have known before the season even started that Holder would not be available and this meeting could have been switched a week to avoid this scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very disappointing that we don't go to Coventry at full strength. A gues is never the same. If Holder scored five then fair enough he has a duffer and we lose. If a guest scores five then we lost because of that and Holder would have scored more etc etc.

 

Guess we will discover who Matt has lined up in the next couple of days.

 

This is something that could be avoided. The fixtures come out far too late and other leagues have their fixtures sorted way before the uk.

 

Whoever planned Fridays Cov v Poole meeting must have known before the season even started that Holder would not be available and this meeting could have been switched a week to avoid this scenario.

One blip away from home doesn't matter now in the grand scheme of things,its all about preparing for the play offs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Poole's website its nothing to do with whose fixtures were out first or any preference by Chris - Torun get preference because Holder has been contracted to them uninterrupted for longer than Poole (He missed part of the 2014 season)!!

 

MF tried to get the fixture switched but Mick didn't want to play ball.

 

I've started the Bees v Pirates thread now.............!

Edited by Skidder1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to know he thinks he can't beat Poole at full strength!! Cold showers for the Coventry team on Weds then? :D

 

 

horton not like the lakeside management and letting ford dictate to meeting call offs and thats the way it should be , not cov's fault holder riding in torun his choice to ride for torun,

coventry didnt make the fixture list up was done by the bspa ..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

horton not like the lakeside management and letting ford dictate to meeting call offs and thats the way it should be , not cov's fault holder riding in torun his choice to ride for torun,

coventry didnt make the fixture list up was done by the bspa ..

it won't make a lot of difference Poole will win with or without Holder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

horton not like the lakeside management and letting ford dictate to meeting call offs and thats the way it should be , not cov's fault holder riding in torun his choice to ride for torun,

coventry didnt make the fixture list up was done by the bspa ..

Yes, antagonise Ford. That will work out well won't it! 😌
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy