JOS50 Posted February 10, 2018 Report Share Posted February 10, 2018 8 hours ago, Tsunami said: The answer is to welcome what is on offer, and support it when you get it, then nobody will see grounds to close it. Don't forget if Speedway was stopped, it's probable that the dogs wouldn't pay and they would lose the lucrative BAGS contracts for relayed afternoon racing. More rubbish from the North East, this latest planning app. is self evidently spurious and has no chance of approval as well they know. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted February 10, 2018 Report Share Posted February 10, 2018 4 hours ago, JOS50 said: More rubbish from the North East, this latest planning app. is self evidently spurious and has no chance of approval as well they know. WOW. Saying that Swindon fans should support their speedway and you say it's rubbish. BTW. I would look up again the meaning of spurious. More crap from you. This plan has more chance of working than the others beforehand, so the best that Swindon fans can do is embrace it whilst keeping due diligence if there is any changes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces51 Posted February 10, 2018 Report Share Posted February 10, 2018 I think the best that Swindon fans can do is go and have a look at this car park where the stadium buildings are supposed to be. I really do hope that it is built but there is certainly sufficient reason to be sceptical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted February 10, 2018 Report Share Posted February 10, 2018 On 29/01/2018 at 11:22 AM, Steve Shovlar said: Looking at the computer pictures, what the hell is that box with Abbey Stadium on it? So a few windows up top to look out of? No terracing in the front? Useless! This is surely just some feeble knock up and no good for viewing whatsoever. Flat in front so three deep at best. Or is this the outside of the stadium and the ‘track’ is just the road to the stadium? Although they have terracing planned either side the big gap in the middle is a bit of a waste, but clearly the planners only have dogs in mind, not speedway. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisperer Posted February 10, 2018 Report Share Posted February 10, 2018 30 minutes ago, Starman2006 said: Although they have terracing planned either side the big gap in the middle is a bit of a waste, but clearly the planners only have dogs in mind, not speedway. One of the stairwells, next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*JJ Posted February 11, 2018 Report Share Posted February 11, 2018 14 hours ago, Starman2006 said: Although they have terracing planned either side the big gap in the middle is a bit of a waste, but clearly the planners only have dogs in mind, not speedway. True. Note the speedway safety fence! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A ORLOV Posted February 11, 2018 Report Share Posted February 11, 2018 8 minutes ago, *JJ said: True. Note the speedway safety fence! I would not rely on any pictures given out as they are clearly not right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted February 11, 2018 Report Share Posted February 11, 2018 1 hour ago, *JJ said: True. Note the speedway safety fence! I did, dog track speedway track. But its all got to come to fruitation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*JJ Posted February 12, 2018 Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 On 11/02/2018 at 10:49 AM, A ORLOV said: I would not rely on any pictures given out as they are clearly not right. Exactly - which is what I said in an earlier post. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemuppet Posted February 12, 2018 Report Share Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) Whatever happens in the future I would think there will not be any Speedway here in 5 years time Edited February 13, 2018 by mickthemuppet 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waytogo28 Posted February 13, 2018 Report Share Posted February 13, 2018 19 hours ago, mickthemuppet said: Whatever happens in the future I would think there will not be any Speedway here in 5 years time I agree but this is only about the UK. It will thrive longer in Poland and possibly Sweden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martinmauger Posted February 14, 2018 Report Share Posted February 14, 2018 Disagree, speedway in the UK has its issues but think it will continue for a good few more years yet.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemuppet Posted February 14, 2018 Report Share Posted February 14, 2018 On 13/02/2018 at 1:49 PM, waytogo28 said: I agree but this is only about the UK. It will thrive longer in Poland and possibly Sweden. I was specificly talking about Swindon Speedway as Speedway will certainly still be in the UK in 5 years time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martinmauger Posted February 14, 2018 Report Share Posted February 14, 2018 Point taken, assuming Swindon's new staduim - with speedway track - is built. Wonder why they didn't decide to just re-build and modify the existing stadium in the first place.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr S Bear Posted February 15, 2018 Report Share Posted February 15, 2018 Looking at the drawings for the revised scheme for the redevelopment of the Abbey Stadium on the council web site I would comment as follows It does not help that some of the descriptions of the drawings/documents do not match the actual drawings/documents which suggests a less than professional approach or a rushed and unchecked submission. This is further reinforced by the fact that there are two different car park layouts/size and shape of grandstand shown on different drawings- the one on the master plan dated May 2017 is different from that on the site plan dated December 2017. I would have expected that the relevant consultant would revised the drawings so that everyone is singing off the same hymn sheet and the planners know what they are approving, the builder knows what he is building and the developer knows what he is paying for. Whilst the first floor hospitality area is large (approx. 37.5m x 19.5m) I would question how useful it will be for speedway or greyhound fans who want to watch the racing. The floor is flat and the two projecting wings at either end of the viewing balcony limit the amount of the speedway/greyhound track that can be seen and anybody viewing the racing from the balcony will further restrict the view of fans in the hospitality area. I assume that its main function will be to generate monies from conferences/functions etc There are two stands shown at either end of the main “grandstand” building 11m x 10m and 25m x 10m but the submitted drawings gave no further details. Judging by the perspectives of the grandstand posted on this forum these stand appear to be temporary stands similar to those at Leicester but with no cover! Other than these stands and the first floor viewing balcony fans will have to stand on the hardstand which runs round the outside of the greyhound track but as there no site sections are included in the submitted documents it is impossible to say if the hardstand is flat, sloping or terraced so viewing could be a problem -remember the complains about the viewing at the Belle Vue Greyhound Stadium There are two rooms at either end of the viewing balcony which are I assume control rooms for the speedway and greyhounds. The one at the east end is approx 4m back from the first bend and the one at the west end is in line with the end of the fourth bend. The drawings state that the length of the new track is 420m and the home straight measures some 38m and if we assume that the start/finish is half way along the straight then the east box is some 12m in start of the start/finish line whilst the west one is some 26m behind the start/finish line. This could be a problem as some refs have trouble making the correct decision when they are in the traditional location in line with the start/finish line. Also the ref’s boxes are accessed from the main public stairs so I trust the doors are strong and have good locks. The site plan show a total of 469 car parking spaces plus space for 24 motor cycles, 5 spaces for mini buses, 3 spaces for coaches plus a bus stop/lay-by. I understand from the last season eve of season Speedway Star special that the Abbey Stadium is not served by public transport. It is some years since I saw 8 buses or coaches at a speedway meeting so the number of spaces for buses/coaches does appear to be excessive or maybe they are required to encourage people to get to the stadium by other means than car as required by the transport plan for the previous scheme. The buses/coaches appear to have a separate one way exit route from that used by cars but all exit routes join together and exit onto Lady Lane. This may be a problem when a large crowd tried to exit at the same time. There appears to be no access from the ground floor reception area to the main spectator area without using the stairs/platform lift so I assume that the public access to the spectator area is via turnstiles either side of the “grandstand” but the submitted drawings do not give any information. Also the riders have to cross the hard standing to access the track so measures will have to be taken to prevent riders riding into spectators. Considering that the reason for the decision to redevelop the current site of the stadium rather than move the stadium is due to problems with drainage it does seem strange that it appears that the relevant consultants have not discussed or reached agreement with the relevant statuary authorities which has resulted in the Lead Local Flood Authority recommending that the scheme not approved as it does not comply with current guidance or there is outstanding information. Although it is not part of the planning application the question that does need asking is when the developer /contractor hopes to build the development. The scheme involves changing the size and shape of the speedway and greyhound tracks, building two car parking areas and associated access road and junctions, demolishing the existing grandstand and erecting new grandstand and if the speedway/greyhound racing continues during the construction period ensuring the safety of the public who will be attending the speedway and greyhound. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattK Posted February 15, 2018 Report Share Posted February 15, 2018 Interesting to see that Google Maps have an updated aerial view of the stadium showing the encroachment of houses. Then: https://binged.it/2BuDFoF Now: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Swindon+Greyhound/@51.6064152,-1.7960524,681m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x487146ec9d041661:0xba6156c784b03b90!8m2!3d51.608415!4d-1.791763 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theboss Posted February 15, 2018 Report Share Posted February 15, 2018 30 minutes ago, Mr S Bear said: Looking at the drawings for the revised scheme for the redevelopment of the Abbey Stadium on the council web site I would comment as follows It does not help that some of the descriptions of the drawings/documents do not match the actual drawings/documents which suggests a less than professional approach or a rushed and unchecked submission. This is further reinforced by the fact that there are two different car park layouts/size and shape of grandstand shown on different drawings- the one on the master plan dated May 2017 is different from that on the site plan dated December 2017. I would have expected that the relevant consultant would revised the drawings so that everyone is singing off the same hymn sheet and the planners know what they are approving, the builder knows what he is building and the developer knows what he is paying for. Whilst the first floor hospitality area is large (approx. 37.5m x 19.5m) I would question how useful it will be for speedway or greyhound fans who want to watch the racing. The floor is flat and the two projecting wings at either end of the viewing balcony limit the amount of the speedway/greyhound track that can be seen and anybody viewing the racing from the balcony will further restrict the view of fans in the hospitality area. I assume that its main function will be to generate monies from conferences/functions etc There are two stands shown at either end of the main “grandstand” building 11m x 10m and 25m x 10m but the submitted drawings gave no further details. Judging by the perspectives of the grandstand posted on this forum these stand appear to be temporary stands similar to those at Leicester but with no cover! Other than these stands and the first floor viewing balcony fans will have to stand on the hardstand which runs round the outside of the greyhound track but as there no site sections are included in the submitted documents it is impossible to say if the hardstand is flat, sloping or terraced so viewing could be a problem -remember the complains about the viewing at the Belle Vue Greyhound Stadium There are two rooms at either end of the viewing balcony which are I assume control rooms for the speedway and greyhounds. The one at the east end is approx 4m back from the first bend and the one at the west end is in line with the end of the fourth bend. The drawings state that the length of the new track is 420m and the home straight measures some 38m and if we assume that the start/finish is half way along the straight then the east box is some 12m in start of the start/finish line whilst the west one is some 26m behind the start/finish line. This could be a problem as some refs have trouble making the correct decision when they are in the traditional location in line with the start/finish line. Also the ref’s boxes are accessed from the main public stairs so I trust the doors are strong and have good locks. The site plan show a total of 469 car parking spaces plus space for 24 motor cycles, 5 spaces for mini buses, 3 spaces for coaches plus a bus stop/lay-by. I understand from the last season eve of season Speedway Star special that the Abbey Stadium is not served by public transport. It is some years since I saw 8 buses or coaches at a speedway meeting so the number of spaces for buses/coaches does appear to be excessive or maybe they are required to encourage people to get to the stadium by other means than car as required by the transport plan for the previous scheme. The buses/coaches appear to have a separate one way exit route from that used by cars but all exit routes join together and exit onto Lady Lane. This may be a problem when a large crowd tried to exit at the same time. There appears to be no access from the ground floor reception area to the main spectator area without using the stairs/platform lift so I assume that the public access to the spectator area is via turnstiles either side of the “grandstand” but the submitted drawings do not give any information. Also the riders have to cross the hard standing to access the track so measures will have to be taken to prevent riders riding into spectators. Considering that the reason for the decision to redevelop the current site of the stadium rather than move the stadium is due to problems with drainage it does seem strange that it appears that the relevant consultants have not discussed or reached agreement with the relevant statuary authorities which has resulted in the Lead Local Flood Authority recommending that the scheme not approved as it does not comply with current guidance or there is outstanding information. Although it is not part of the planning application the question that does need asking is when the developer /contractor hopes to build the development. The scheme involves changing the size and shape of the speedway and greyhound tracks, building two car parking areas and associated access road and junctions, demolishing the existing grandstand and erecting new grandstand and if the speedway/greyhound racing continues during the construction period ensuring the safety of the public who will be attending the speedway and greyhound. An excellent review which raises more questions as to how genuine this is. I remember having a new building designed for kings Lynn (although never built) and every single one of those points plus more where discussed and put into the design. Seems likely to me that this will sadly emulate the Coventry saga. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch958 Posted February 15, 2018 Report Share Posted February 15, 2018 they need to start looking now for another site - maybe they are. Wasn't planning granted on condition of the stadium remaining? I don't know but surely the council would take a dim view of planning being flouted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedy swindon pete Posted February 15, 2018 Report Share Posted February 15, 2018 4 hours ago, Mr S Bear said: Looking at the drawings for the revised scheme for the redevelopment of the Abbey Stadium on the council web site I would comment as follows It does not help that some of the descriptions of the drawings/documents do not match the actual drawings/documents which suggests a less than professional approach or a rushed and unchecked submission. This is further reinforced by the fact that there are two different car park layouts/size and shape of grandstand shown on different drawings- the one on the master plan dated May 2017 is different from that on the site plan dated December 2017. I would have expected that the relevant consultant would revised the drawings so that everyone is singing off the same hymn sheet and the planners know what they are approving, the builder knows what he is building and the developer knows what he is paying for. Whilst the first floor hospitality area is large (approx. 37.5m x 19.5m) I would question how useful it will be for speedway or greyhound fans who want to watch the racing. The floor is flat and the two projecting wings at either end of the viewing balcony limit the amount of the speedway/greyhound track that can be seen and anybody viewing the racing from the balcony will further restrict the view of fans in the hospitality area. I assume that its main function will be to generate monies from conferences/functions etc There are two stands shown at either end of the main “grandstand” building 11m x 10m and 25m x 10m but the submitted drawings gave no further details. Judging by the perspectives of the grandstand posted on this forum these stand appear to be temporary stands similar to those at Leicester but with no cover! Other than these stands and the first floor viewing balcony fans will have to stand on the hardstand which runs round the outside of the greyhound track but as there no site sections are included in the submitted documents it is impossible to say if the hardstand is flat, sloping or terraced so viewing could be a problem -remember the complains about the viewing at the Belle Vue Greyhound Stadium There are two rooms at either end of the viewing balcony which are I assume control rooms for the speedway and greyhounds. The one at the east end is approx 4m back from the first bend and the one at the west end is in line with the end of the fourth bend. The drawings state that the length of the new track is 420m and the home straight measures some 38m and if we assume that the start/finish is half way along the straight then the east box is some 12m in start of the start/finish line whilst the west one is some 26m behind the start/finish line. This could be a problem as some refs have trouble making the correct decision when they are in the traditional location in line with the start/finish line. Also the ref’s boxes are accessed from the main public stairs so I trust the doors are strong and have good locks. The site plan show a total of 469 car parking spaces plus space for 24 motor cycles, 5 spaces for mini buses, 3 spaces for coaches plus a bus stop/lay-by. I understand from the last season eve of season Speedway Star special that the Abbey Stadium is not served by public transport. It is some years since I saw 8 buses or coaches at a speedway meeting so the number of spaces for buses/coaches does appear to be excessive or maybe they are required to encourage people to get to the stadium by other means than car as required by the transport plan for the previous scheme. The buses/coaches appear to have a separate one way exit route from that used by cars but all exit routes join together and exit onto Lady Lane. This may be a problem when a large crowd tried to exit at the same time. There appears to be no access from the ground floor reception area to the main spectator area without using the stairs/platform lift so I assume that the public access to the spectator area is via turnstiles either side of the “grandstand” but the submitted drawings do not give any information. Also the riders have to cross the hard standing to access the track so measures will have to be taken to prevent riders riding into spectators. Considering that the reason for the decision to redevelop the current site of the stadium rather than move the stadium is due to problems with drainage it does seem strange that it appears that the relevant consultants have not discussed or reached agreement with the relevant statuary authorities which has resulted in the Lead Local Flood Authority recommending that the scheme not approved as it does not comply with current guidance or there is outstanding information. Although it is not part of the planning application the question that does need asking is when the developer /contractor hopes to build the development. The scheme involves changing the size and shape of the speedway and greyhound tracks, building two car parking areas and associated access road and junctions, demolishing the existing grandstand and erecting new grandstand and if the speedway/greyhound racing continues during the construction period ensuring the safety of the public who will be attending the speedway and greyhound. Or in other words....it’s all a load of bollocks. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A ORLOV Posted February 15, 2018 Report Share Posted February 15, 2018 10 minutes ago, Speedy swindon pete said: Or in other words....it’s all a load of bollocks. There were just as many questions about the plans for the "first new site" next to the present stadium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.